Imaginos1892 wrote:So far, I haven't seen any evidence that it's anything more than a partisan kangaroo-court farce. If there was any substance to their accusations, they would send them to the Senate for trial.
As it is, they're 'sitting' on the case, crowing that 'the President has been impeached!' when so far, all they have is an indictment they're afraid to submit for trial because they don't control the Senate. They won't be able to control what other facts come to light, either.
I think the House Of Representatives has turned into Room 9-A.
———————————
"Wait a minute, wait a minute, I wanted an argument!"
"Oh, you want Room 9 then. This is Room 9-A — ABUSE!!
"
The President is impeached. That is what happened in the House and what the House does. The Senate's role is to remove the President from office on the basis of the Houses impeachment. What you are referring to as the indictment is the voted out articles of impeachment.
Especially in our currently highly charged political environment I don't expect the President to be removed. I wish it could be handled in a bipartisan way. But even in more normal times a President has never been removed by this process.
The speaker has said that she will send the articles up when the Senate establishes the rules under which it will proceed. But the majority leader seems to want to use the Senate's procedure into Trumps rubber stamp from which he will claim vindication. So whatever happens to the articles of impeachment, the whole matter will have to be decided by the voters in the fall.
Don
-