PeterZ wrote:gcomeau wrote:
Certain based on WHAT?
It has been pointed out to you that over half a dozen investigations, run by her political opponents who like nothing better than to call her a liar... all found she didn't lie.
It has been pointed out to you that the statements to which you are referring were not lies.
You have provided ZERO backing for lies being told about Benghazi.
From where does your certitude spring? An act of religious faith?
All those investigations prove is that she is not legally lying. That does not mean that her actions conveyed the truth as she knew it. She shared with her daughter what she believed to be most likely true.
FFS, there are STANDARDS for official statements issued by government officials about attacks that killed Americans. And "hey America, let me just spout off about my personal suspicions immediately after it happened before the intelligence is in with the findings" doesn't freaking cut it.
That is not LYING. That is the basic responsibilities of the position.
When the intel said it, then it was publicly communicated. It's. That. Damn. Simple.
You have yet to provide any actual lies.