Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests

Honorverse ramblings and musings

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Weird Harold   » Sun Aug 16, 2015 5:27 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

saber964 wrote:When President G W Bush flew into Iraq a few years ago he didn't fly in the AFO 747 he normally jets around in, he flew in a C-17 (with a special call-sign) with a couple of special trailers in the cargo bay.



Guys, "Air Force One" is the call sign of ANY USAF plane carrying the President, "Air Force Two" is the Vice President's plane's call sign.

The C-17 flown into Iraq was "Air Force One."

The 707 Nixon left Washington in was "Air Force One" for a little less than half the trip to California. It ceased to be "Air Force One" when Gerald Ford took the Oath of Office. It reverted to its tail number for the remainder of the trip.

The same rule applies to each service's aircraft; the VIP helicopters are "Marine One" "Marine Two" Or revert to their tail numbers for other VIPs

Wikipedia wrote:On May 1, 2003, Bush became the first sitting President to arrive in an arrested landing in a fixed-wing aircraft on an aircraft carrier when he arrived at the USS Abraham Lincoln in a Lockheed S-3 Viking, dubbed Navy One, as the carrier lay just off the San Diego coast, having returned from combat operations in the Persian Gulf.


It doesn't matter whether the Aircraft is combat capable or an unarmed ultralight, the call sign stays with the president, not the airplane.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by cthia   » Sun Aug 16, 2015 5:40 pm

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

Weird Harold wrote:
saber964 wrote:When President G W Bush flew into Iraq a few years ago he didn't fly in the AFO 747 he normally jets around in, he flew in a C-17 (with a special call-sign) with a couple of special trailers in the cargo bay.



Guys, "Air Force One" is the call sign of ANY USAF plane carrying the President, "Air Force Two" is the Vice President's plane's call sign.

The C-17 flown into Iraq was "Air Force One."

The 707 Nixon left Washington in was "Air Force One" for a little less than half the trip to California. It ceased to be "Air Force One" when Gerald Ford took the Oath of Office. It reverted to its tail number for the remainder of the trip.

The same rule applies to each service's aircraft; the VIP helicopters are "Marine One" "Marine Two" Or revert to their tail numbers for other VIPs

Wikipedia wrote:On May 1, 2003, Bush became the first sitting President to arrive in an arrested landing in a fixed-wing aircraft on an aircraft carrier when he arrived at the USS Abraham Lincoln in a Lockheed S-3 Viking, dubbed Navy One, as the carrier lay just off the San Diego coast, having returned from combat operations in the Persian Gulf.


It doesn't matter whether the Aircraft is combat capable or an unarmed ultralight, the call sign stays with the president, not the airplane.

True Harold, with the one exception of when the President is aboard a civilian plane it enjoys a call sign of Executive One.

Of course, the President's family is "Executive One - Foxtrot."

I would venture to say that everyone knew that, but it doesn't color the discussion.

Edit: Ok, you did say any USAF plane. Correct. But there is an instance where AFO does not follow the President.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: Operation Hassan: ramblings and musings
Post by cthia   » Sun Aug 16, 2015 6:00 pm

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

JeffEngel wrote:
cthia wrote:My point is this. The navy balks at Honor flying her flag on anything less than a fully equipped armored SD. Is the Honor of the Queen worth less than that?

It's not so much for the protection of the Salamander. It's to maintain command of the fleet, and to do so compatible with the fleet's general effectiveness. The flag bridge and staff support portions of a SD are a rather trivial portion of the total SD, which is built to fight. It's built to be right there where fire is being sent out and received - built to deliver it, built to take it. Putting a commander in that keeps the commander where she needs to be to work, and it's not taking the ship away from where it does its work or diverting it from it.

The Queen does not command fleets. She's not where the fighting is. Plenty effort is taken to keep her away from that, quite successfully. It's only in the case of total failure of all such efforts that armor and sidewalls around the monarch serve any point, and all that stupendous effort is in that case taken away from where you have, otherwise, any expectation of needing firepower or armor.

Do forgive my boldness to embolden.

That can certainly be argued on a political level. Elizabeth's government will always support the war effort to take the fight to the enemy thus 'commanding fleets by enabling.' It is imperative that the Queen's government run smoothly without a snag or interruption, such as that suffered at the hands of High Ridge and his cronies. Janasick, for one.

The death of the Queen has the potential to kill the war effort at any time. Especially at the politically-critical right/wrong time. Heck, the changing of the Prime Minister accomplished the same task.

Certainly the Old Republic didn't disagree that the death of a Queen, or King, or key members of the Manticoran government for that matter, could spell victory to the Republic. Or their many assassination attempts were pointless.

And surely Protector Benjamin and Grayson doesn't share your thoughts of resources being squandered or the Protector's Own would be a part of the Navy.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: Operation Hassan: ramblings and musings
Post by JeffEngel   » Sun Aug 16, 2015 6:38 pm

JeffEngel
Admiral

Posts: 2074
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:06 pm

cthia wrote:
JeffEngel wrote:[Being on an SD is] not so much for the protection of the Salamander. It's to maintain command of the fleet, and to do so compatible with the fleet's general effectiveness. The flag bridge and staff support portions of a SD are a rather trivial portion of the total SD, which is built to fight. It's built to be right there where fire is being sent out and received - built to deliver it, built to take it. Putting a commander in that keeps the commander where she needs to be to work, and it's not taking the ship away from where it does its work or diverting it from it.

The Queen does not command fleets. She's not where the fighting is. Plenty effort is taken to keep her away from that, quite successfully. It's only in the case of total failure of all such efforts that armor and sidewalls around the monarch serve any point, and all that stupendous effort is in that case taken away from where you have, otherwise, any expectation of needing firepower or armor.

Do forgive my boldness to embolden.

That can certainly be argued on a political level. Elizabeth's government will always support the war effort to take the fight to the enemy thus 'commanding fleets by enabling.' It is imperative that the Queen's government run smoothly without a snag or interruption, such as that suffered at the hands of High Ridge and his cronies. Janasick, for one.
Granted. And does that require keeping the Queen on a capital ship? It does not. It requires keeping her away from hostile missiles - or, if that's somehow impossible and worth the effort for the likely utility - inside a lot of defenses.

In Grayson, they were in an area cleared of any realistic threat, surrounded by plenty personal security, and only threatened by the combination of a totally unknown stealth missile and a homing beacon that had gotten through intense scrutiny.

Sometimes, any reasonable security will fail. It's not call to keep jacking security up no matter the cost, particularly when the costs are very, very high and the likely uses for what you get paying those costs are very, very rare. That's what happened that day in Yeltsin.

It's not a scandal. It'd be a scandal if the monarchs got killed from something cheap, easy, routine security would have caught. It'd be a scandal if they got killed from something any assassin would have had the likely means to use. It's not a scandal when security fails against (e.g.) interdimensional ninja hamsters. And that missile is the security equivalent.

If Elizabeth III dies due to Mesan mercenary interdimensional ninja hamsters popping into Mount Royal Palace from the Furry Plane, gutting her and Ariel with tiny swords and lots of rodent effort, twitching their bloody whiskers in satisfaction, and poofing back to collect their payment in cheese... it will not be a time to court-martial the Queen's Own for not funding research in blocking dimension-jumping or tasking ONI with gathering intel on Mesan contacts with the hamster ninja mercenary clans.

Sometimes the bad guy will win, when he's very lucky or very good, and it's not your fault. Your efforts are there to make sure it takes luck and skill to make the bad things happen. They did. A capital ship to keep the monarch safe where no threat can be found or should be suspected is overkill. Send it where you know it's got work to do.
The death of the Queen has the potential to kill the war effort at any time. Especially at the politically-critical right/wrong time. Heck, the changing of the Prime Minister accomplished the same task.
Yes. Is that an argument for government by committees of people who are kept scattered in secured underground locations all the time? If not, there will still be risks run, and it's relevant to consider the likelihood of measures to be relevant and their costs versus the likely reward for employing them. If so, well, we're off on a deeper tangent.

Certainly the Old Republic didn't disagree that the death of a Queen, or King, or key members of the Manticoran government for that matter, could spell victory to the Republic. Or their many assassination attempts were pointless.
In point of fact, killing King Roger was a mixed result. It let them immediately move on Trevor's Star, but it made the Manticoran monarch even more determined to stop them long-term.

Saint-Just got kinda lucky with his. Killing Elizabeth wouldn't've done much good: her heir would carry on with just the same policies and even more blood in his eye. (And may well have accepted and handled the constitutional crisis punting High Ridge and company to continue the war would have entailed.) Killing Benjamin and leaving the Protectorship in a regency would have been more serious for Grayson, but I doubt that would have done Haven a bit of good. As it stood, he got two of four reasonably principal targets, one of whom made a difference, entirely because Manticore's constitution leaves too much power in the hands of a clique of overbred cretins, and the man able to juggle that nuthouse was killed. Even THEN it would not have done enough good if Baron Grantville had the connections with those drooling nincompoops Cromarty did, or with a slightly different but similarly sized group. If, if, if.... The lesson here isn't to go even further to prevent assassinations. It's to go further to create robust government structures that aren't hostage to people you can't trust to keep at least one side of an airlock closed.
And surely Protector Benjamin and Grayson doesn't share your thoughts of resources being squandered or the Protector's Own would be a part of the Navy.

They'd be accepting your argument only if the Protector's Own were perpetually on duty as Benjamin's bodyguards - in which case Thunderbolt would have destroyed Sidemore Station and Admiral Harrington.
Top
Re: Operation Hassan: ramblings and musings
Post by Jonathan_S   » Sun Aug 16, 2015 7:50 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 9092
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

cthia wrote:Current Presidents have different options and capabilities available to them. First, they need the capability to stay aloft indefinitely. A fuel guzzling fighter can't deliver that. AFO also needs unlimited range, fighter planes can't deliver that. Fighter planes are also two-seaters at best and cannot host a flying command center, replete with all communications options. But they are escorted by the best the navy has to offer.

Certainly, if present Earth had the same capabilities of Manticore do you seriously doubt that AFO would be a fully tricked out SD, BC at least?

My point is this. The navy balks at Honor flying her flag on anything less than a fully equipped armored SD. Is the Honor of the Queen worth less than that?

Ok, the USN has less carriers than Manticore has SD(P)s, but the US Army has more M1 tanks. Yet they don't allocate one of those for the President's personal transportation -- despite the fact that the presidential limos are far more vulnerable to even light anti-tank weapons that the hull of a main battle-tank.

Nearly always it just doesn't make sense to give the head of state protection equal to the toughest piece of military hardware you have in somewhat widespread deployment.
Top
Re: Operation Hassan: ramblings and musings
Post by cthia   » Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:29 pm

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

Jonathan_S wrote:
cthia wrote:Current Presidents have different options and capabilities available to them. First, they need the capability to stay aloft indefinitely. A fuel guzzling fighter can't deliver that. AFO also needs unlimited range, fighter planes can't deliver that. Fighter planes are also two-seaters at best and cannot host a flying command center, replete with all communications options. But they are escorted by the best the navy has to offer.

Certainly, if present Earth had the same capabilities of Manticore do you seriously doubt that AFO would be a fully tricked out SD, BC at least?

My point is this. The navy balks at Honor flying her flag on anything less than a fully equipped armored SD. Is the Honor of the Queen worth less than that?

Ok, the USN has less carriers than Manticore has SD(P)s, but the US Army has more M1 tanks. Yet they don't allocate one of those for the President's personal transportation -- despite the fact that the presidential limos are far more vulnerable to even light anti-tank weapons that the hull of a main battle-tank.

Nearly always it just doesn't make sense to give the head of state protection equal to the toughest piece of military hardware you have in somewhat widespread deployment.

But but but... FDR had a tank.

http://forgottenhistoryblog.com/preside ... limousine/

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by saber964   » Sun Aug 16, 2015 11:04 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

Weird Harold wrote:
saber964 wrote:When President G W Bush flew into Iraq a few years ago he didn't fly in the AFO 747 he normally jets around in, he flew in a C-17 (with a special call-sign) with a couple of special trailers in the cargo bay.



Guys, "Air Force One" is the call sign of ANY USAF plane carrying the President, "Air Force Two" is the Vice President's plane's call sign.

The C-17 flown into Iraq was "Air Force One."

The 707 Nixon left Washington in was "Air Force One" for a little less than half the trip to California. It ceased to be "Air Force One" when Gerald Ford took the Oath of Office. It reverted to its tail number for the remainder of the trip.

The same rule applies to each service's aircraft; the VIP helicopters are "Marine One" "Marine Two" Or revert to their tail numbers for other VIPs

Wikipedia wrote:On May 1, 2003, Bush became the first sitting President to arrive in an arrested landing in a fixed-wing aircraft on an aircraft carrier when he arrived at the USS Abraham Lincoln in a Lockheed S-3 Viking, dubbed Navy One, as the carrier lay just off the San Diego coast, having returned from combat operations in the Persian Gulf.


It doesn't matter whether the Aircraft is combat capable or an unarmed ultralight, the call sign stays with the president, not the airplane.



Yes and no. When Bush flew in, his plane used the call sign SAM 1543. SAM means Special Air Mission and 1543 was the tail number of the C-17.
Top
Re: Operation Hassan: ramblings and musings
Post by Jonathan_S   » Mon Aug 17, 2015 8:40 am

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 9092
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

cthia wrote:
Jonathan_S wrote:Ok, the USN has less carriers than Manticore has SD(P)s, but the US Army has more M1 tanks. Yet they don't allocate one of those for the President's personal transportation -- despite the fact that the presidential limos are far more vulnerable to even light anti-tank weapons that the hull of a main battle-tank.

Nearly always it just doesn't make sense to give the head of state protection equal to the toughest piece of military hardware you have in somewhat widespread deployment.

But but but... FDR had a tank.

http://forgottenhistoryblog.com/preside ... limousine/

Even in '41 there's a far cry betweeen Capone's armored car, with 3,000 pounds of steel plate and bullet resistant windows, and an M3 Stewart tank, with tons of armor.

The Presidents, starting with FDR, have armored cars, not tanks. They give protection against handguns and rifles, but are less defended than tanks against heavier weapons.


It's a reasonable tradeoff, it provides protection against the kind of attacks that are more likely without the expense and image issues necessary to protect against the greatest number of improbable threats.
Top
Re: Operation Hassan: ramblings and musings
Post by cthia   » Mon Aug 17, 2015 10:54 am

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

JeffEngel wrote:[Being on an SD is] not so much for the protection of the Salamander. It's to maintain command of the fleet, and to do so compatible with the fleet's general effectiveness. The flag bridge and staff support portions of a SD are a rather trivial portion of the total SD, which is built to fight. It's built to be right there where fire is being sent out and received - built to deliver it, built to take it. Putting a commander in that keeps the commander where she needs to be to work, and it's not taking the ship away from where it does its work or diverting it from it.

That may have rang true, when her name was just Honor and she wasn't as important to the war effort. And it indeed may continually ring true in general. The moment that she became known as the Salamander is the moment that argument won't get off the Senate floor. How important has the Salamander become to the war effort? How instrumental has Honor been to Manticore's survival? To Grayson's survival? To Haven's survival? And now to the GA's survival? I posed this question before, "How many lives, SDs, fleets of SDs and Manticoran credits has Honor become worth?" It isn't a conversation of which I'd want Honor privy but it has been answered countless times by individual officers. By Truman when she removed the safety interlocks and risked an entire ship and the lives of the entire crew as well as her own to bring back the cavalry in time, with Honor's survival in mind. When White Haven lit a fire under the asses of his fleet - risking lives in kind - by responding as quickly as he dared, reciprocally taking risks with the safety interlocks as well.

Honor is important, is an understatement. Her death would have meant the death of many more spacers and the lost of many more ships -- in at least three separate systems. You protect your most valuable resources At All Costs because the butchers bill you save will be much greater. And if you think her Monarch and anyone in the RMN worth the starch in their uniform thinks any differently then you're drinking up the Old Tilmans! lol

JeffEngel wrote:The Queen does not command fleets. She's not where the fighting is. Plenty effort is taken to keep her away from that, quite successfully. It's only in the case of total failure of all such efforts that armor and sidewalls around the monarch serve any point, and all that stupendous effort is in that case taken away from where you have, otherwise, any expectation of needing firepower or armor.

cthia wrote:Do forgive my boldness to embolden.

That can certainly be argued on a political level. Elizabeth's government will always support the war effort to take the fight to the enemy thus 'commanding fleets by enabling.' It is imperative that the Queen's government run smoothly without a snag or interruption, such as that suffered at the hands of High Ridge and his cronies. Janasick, for one.

JeffEngel wrote:Granted. And does that require keeping the Queen on a capital ship? It does not. It requires keeping her away from hostile missiles - or, if that's somehow impossible and worth the effort for the likely utility - inside a lot of defenses.

My entire initial point.

JeffEngel wrote:In Grayson, they were in an area cleared of any realistic threat, surrounded by plenty personal security, and only threatened by the combination of a totally unknown stealth missile and a homing beacon that had gotten through intense scrutiny.

You don't set up security measures and contingency plans for excrement that you can think of. You do it for the feces hitting the fan that you can't. Grayson was cleared of a realistic threat but the security measures themselves weren't realistic. Monthly security for Elizabeth isn't cheap. Anytime she boards an atmosphere breather for local travel there is a horde of sting ships, plans, itineries, contingencies, marines, etc. and etc. The need to protect Elizabeth hasn't fell on death ears. If it is prudent to think as you, then why all of the daily hassle? And what can be said of an Empire who places the value of an SD above that of their Monarch?

JeffEngel wrote:Sometimes, any reasonable security will fail. It's not call to keep jacking security up no matter the cost, particularly when the costs are very, very high and the likely uses for what you get paying those costs are very, very rare. That's what happened that day in Yeltsin.

Reasonable is the word. The cost of a single fully tricked out SD for the Monarch of the most powerful Star Kingdom in history - that can also assist Home Fleet - is more than reasonable.

Rarity is not an excuse to be slack in security. There aren't many suicidal maniacs that would take a shot at the President in broad daylight. But one surely will. There aren't many civilians that will strap incendiary devices to little kids, but one surely will. Placing so many powerful people aboard an eggshell isn't reasonable security.

And you keep harping on this thing called cost. Manticore isn't a planet out in the Verge. They are the richest planet in the Honorverse and beyond, by far per capita. Queen Elizabeth could build the thing out of her coffee kitty. Heck, Hauptman Enterprises would gladly build her a flying fortress. No matter that it would rarely be used, it would be there if it did. And in the interim in can serve as part of Home Fleet. HMS Royal Palace.

But if you're going to consider cost, consider the cost to the war effort if Elizabeth is successfully assassinated and a band of High Ridged imbeciles replace her government. What was the cost to her government in terms of lives, ships, time and dollars at the hands of the High Ridge government and Janasick?

JeffEngel wrote:It's not a scandal. It'd be a scandal if the monarchs got killed from something cheap, easy, routine security would have caught. It'd be a scandal if they got killed from something any assassin would have had the likely means to use. It's not a scandal when security fails against (e.g.) interdimensional ninja hamsters. And that missile is the security equivalent.

If Elizabeth III dies due to Mesan mercenary interdimensional ninja hamsters popping into Mount Royal Palace from the Furry Plane, gutting her and Ariel with tiny swords and lots of rodent effort, twitching their bloody whiskers in satisfaction, and poofing back to collect their payment in cheese... it will not be a time to court-martial the Queen's Own for not funding research in blocking dimension-jumping or tasking ONI with gathering intel on Mesan contacts with the hamster ninja mercenary clans.

Sometimes the bad guy will win, when he's very lucky or very good, and it's not your fault. Your efforts are there to make sure it takes luck and skill to make the bad things happen. They did. A capital ship to keep the monarch safe where no threat can be found or should be suspected is overkill. Send it where you know it's got work to do.

Unless those Ninja Hamsters succeeded in their mission because the richest government in history was cheap in protecting the Queen. When she was squirreled away behind a ship of straw and all the Hamsters had to do was huff and puff and blow their ship in.

There were only two missiles Jeff. Two missiles that would have taken out both yachts had it not been for a runabout. At almost the heartbreaking cost of Manticore's most prized commander. Spend all that money on planetary security for your Monarch, but send her off planet to possibly encounter pirates, rogue elements, Peep ships and squadrons, MAlign ships or any of the unknown, aboard an eggshell. It just doesn't make sense to me. That was the most important convoy that ever traveled the Haven sector! Show a little respect for the Queen and what she represents. If the screen would have been lost to Peep ships enroute then Queen Adrienne would have been left naked. You do know what pirates do to naked women? And if Queen Elizabeth would have suffered what Ensign Mai-Ling and Co. did at the hands of pirates because they couldn't shoot back??? That's your scandal!
cthia wrote:The death of the Queen has the potential to kill the war effort at any time. Especially at the politically-critical right/wrong time. Heck, the changing of the Prime Minister accomplished the same task.

JeffEngel wrote:Yes. Is that an argument for government by committees of people who are kept scattered in secured underground locations all the time? If not, there will still be risks run, and it's relevant to consider the likelihood of measures to be relevant and their costs versus the likely reward for employing them. If so, well, we're off on a deeper tangent.

Yet our very own government does keep the President underground, when need be. And an adequate compliment of officials to ensure that the current government is not decapitated and continues to run smoothly. When the President ventures out there's a horde of Secret Service upon Secret-Secret Service and a parade of vehicles NOT carrying the President acting as a decoy to the parade of vehicles carrying the real President with F-16s on high alert and more of the SS guys already set up at the location where the President is headed with snipers all along the route.

AFO is NOT a cheap vehicle or cheap to operate. All of the constant security measures implemented to protect our President including AFO comes at a horrendous cost to our taxpayers. Not a single American would propose to begin cutting costs there.

If a personal force field was developed for individuals but the overall cost was considered astronomical, do you seriously doubt that the President would be outfitted at the expense of the taxpayers?
cthia wrote:Certainly the Old Republic didn't disagree that the death of a Queen, or King, or key members of the Manticoran government for that matter, could spell victory to the Republic. Or their many assassination attempts were pointless.

JeffEngel wrote:In point of fact, killing King Roger was a mixed result. It let them immediately move on Trevor's Star, but it made the Manticoran monarch even more determined to stop them long-term.

Saint-Just got kinda lucky with his. Killing Elizabeth wouldn't've done much good: her heir would carry on with just the same policies and even more blood in his eye. (And may well have accepted and handled the constitutional crisis punting High Ridge and company to continue the war would have entailed.) Killing Benjamin and leaving the Protectorship in a regency would have been more serious for Grayson, but I doubt that would have done Haven a bit of good. As it stood, he got two of four reasonably principal targets, one of whom made a difference, entirely because Manticore's constitution leaves too much power in the hands of a clique of overbred cretins, and the man able to juggle that nuthouse was killed. Even THEN it would not have done enough good if Baron Grantville had the connections with those drooling nincompoops Cromarty did, or with a slightly different but similarly sized group. If, if, if.... The lesson here isn't to go even further to prevent assassinations. It's to go further to create robust government structures that aren't hostage to people you can't trust to keep at least one side of an airlock closed.

None of that matters to the discussion. What matters is Haven's perception of what key assassinations would do for them.

And you don't send your Monarch out on a system to system excursion aboard a vehicle that is little more than an eggshell in the most dangerous region of space -- a region fraught with pirates and privateers and the highest per capita of assassinations in the Haven sector or anywhere else, that garnered that reputation with a personal campaign against your very Monarch and her family!
cthia wrote:And surely Protector Benjamin and Grayson doesn't share your thoughts of resources being squandered or the Protector's Own would be a part of the Navy.

JeffEngel wrote:They'd be accepting your argument only if the Protector's Own were perpetually on duty as Benjamin's bodyguards - in which case Thunderbolt would have destroyed Sidemore Station and Admiral Harrington.

That's exactly what they were comfortable with. When Benjamin sent Protector's Own away to assist Honor he did it on his own authority, IIRC. He stated himself that if the truth of that got out it'd cause a ruckus. That was discussed with Honor.

I truly do not know why we are arguing this Jeff. The richest system in the known galaxy can afford that type of private yacht to protect the Queen. Hauptman or his daughter will foot the cost and build the damn thing if the Queen or her government can't afford it. lol

But no need. Manticore agrees with me and finally sees the error of their ways...
HMS Duke of Cromarty was a modified Agamemnon-class battle cruiser of the Royal Manticoran Navy that served as a royal yacht for Queen Elizabeth III.

The regular battlecruiser hull that would become the Duke of Cromarty had already been laid down by the time the previous yacht, HMS Queen Adrienne, was destroyed by Masadan terrorists in 1915 PD. Determined not to allow a similar incident to happen again, the new High Ridge government ordered a warship to be converted into the next Royal yacht.

On the suggestion of First Lord of the Admirality Edward Janacek, the armored forward bulkhead of its pod core was moved further aft, cutting the ship's missile supply in half, in order to create space for state passenger cabins, conference rooms, and even a formal ballroom. Otherwise, the Duke of Cromarty was a fully capable warship with state-of-the-art weapons, defences, and electronic warfare capability. (HH9, Infodump)

When HMS Hexapuma and HMS Warlock returned to the Manticore System after the successful yet costly Battle of Monica, they were greeted by the Home Fleet in Coronation Day formation, in the presence of the queen aboard Duke of Cromarty. (SI1) --wiki


.
Last edited by cthia on Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: Operation Hassan: ramblings and musings
Post by JeffEngel   » Mon Aug 17, 2015 12:04 pm

JeffEngel
Admiral

Posts: 2074
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:06 pm

cthia wrote: It is imperative that the Queen's government run smoothly without a snag or interruption, such as that suffered at the hands of High Ridge and his cronies. Janasick, for one.

JeffEngel wrote:Granted. And does that require keeping the Queen on a capital ship? It does not. It requires keeping her away from hostile missiles - or, if that's somehow impossible and worth the effort for the likely utility - inside a lot of defenses.

My entire initial point.

Just to snip a good bit as this is getting really lengthy -
The issue is cost versus likely utility. I don't think you're appreciating how much a supredreadnought costs. It's the toughest mobile artifact in human history. Most Honorverse industrialized planets cannot justify the cost of one of them for their entire planetary, even system, defense. (Apart from the fact that, if you want to defend your system/planet and you've only that much to spend, more smaller units would be better.) Manticore needed a solid wall, and despite its fabulous wealth for a single system, was building DN's to cover much of their wall needs because of the expense.

The cost of the Queen's Own, all those stingships, and the old royal yacht, would vanish like a drop in the ocean compared to that cost. All of that is quite expensive, and does a very good job. For hundreds of years, it's kept monarchs alive despite no small amount of effort to make them die. One attempt - again, out of the blue, outside all reasonable preparations based on knowledge had before the fact - would have been frustrated by the stupendous cost of a capital ship yacht. (You've not mentioned it, but on your side of the argument, we may as well add that a yacht that size would have had the PM's in it too, so that they'd've been safe as well.)

I shudder to think how many times and how many places the war effort may have fallen had Manticore had one SD's worth of shipping less, because it was sitting in Manticore orbit in case the Queen should make one of those once a decade or so trips out of the system.

JeffEngel wrote:In Grayson, they were in an area cleared of any realistic threat, surrounded by plenty personal security, and only threatened by the combination of a totally unknown stealth missile and a homing beacon that had gotten through intense scrutiny.

You don't set up security measures and contingency plans for excrement that you can think of. You do it for the feces hitting the fan that you can't.
No, you don't. You can't. You set it up to handle what you can expect, even with a low probability. Completely unexpected things you can't prepare for, other than having alert personnel with flexible responses available that can be adapted as necessary. Certainly a capital ship represents a whole lot of resource on hand in case something comes up, but it's almost never going to come up, and vastly less expensive alternatives will handle virtually all problems it'd be useful for.
Grayson was cleared of a realistic threat but the security measures themselves weren't realistic. Monthly security for Elizabeth isn't cheap. Anytime she boards an atmosphere breather for local travel there is a horde of sting ships, plans, itineries, contingencies, marines, etc. and etc. The need to protect Elizabeth hasn't fell on death ears. If it is prudent to think as you, then why all of the daily hassle? And what can be said of an Empire who places the value of an SD above that of their Monarch?
That it's got priorities straight and is likely to continue to exist.

It's the scale thing you're not getting, I think, along with the odds. The added cost of a specific royal yacht SD is stupendous; the likely use is remote.

JeffEngel wrote:Sometimes, any reasonable security will fail. It's not call to keep jacking security up no matter the cost, particularly when the costs are very, very high and the likely uses for what you get paying those costs are very, very rare. That's what happened that day in Yeltsin.

Reasonable is the word. The cost of a single fully tricked out SD for the Monarch of the most powerful Star Kingdom in history - that can also assist Home Fleet - is more than reasonable.
It's not assisting Home Fleet if it's parked in orbit in case the Queen wants a jaunt, or off on that jaunt.

Something that could work would be, instead of the plush royal yacht, putting available ships to work getting the Queen about when it happens. The FDR and Churchill WWII trips would be an example. In that case, it's not putting that stupendous cost to a job that's rarely necessary - it's tapping an existing resource for a specific, limited-time purpose. Not even a SD would be so luxurious, but it'd do, I'm sure - as would many of the RMN's CA's, BC's, DN's, CLAC's. (The stupid formal ballroom can be dispensed with, I'm sure.) Drawing that away from its station for security that's almost certainly unnecessary isn't a small opportunity cost, but it's still vastly easier to justify.
Rarity is not an excuse to be slack in security. There aren't many suicidal maniacs that would take a shot at the President in broad daylight. But one surely will. There aren't many civilians that will strap incendiary devices to little kids, but one surely will. Placing so many powerful people aboard an eggshell isn't reasonable security.
Quite a lot - everything professional paranoiacs considered necessary or useful - was done to keep those eggshells away from any hard bumps. As it happened, those preparations - once - were not adequate. And now they know to check against the possibility of homing beacons and stealth missiles, so they can take preparations short of capital ship yachts.
And you keep harping on this thing called cost. Manticore isn't a planet out in the Verge. They are the richest planet in the Honorverse and beyond, by far per capita. Queen Elizabeth could build the thing out of her coffee kitty. Heck, Hauptman Enterprises would gladly build her a flying fortress. No matter that it would rarely be used, it would be there if it did. And in the interim in can serve as part of Home Fleet. HMS Royal Palace.

But if you're going to consider cost, consider the cost to the war effort if Elizabeth is successfully assassinated and a band of High Ridged imbeciles replace her government. What was the cost to her government in terms of lives, ships, time and dollars at the hands of the High Ridge government and Janasick?
Incalculable. But that was the result of killing Cromarty, not her. Is that going to mean a yacht for the PM too? Hopefully they could share... Even then though, cheaper alternatives are possible, including something simply drawn from Home Fleet if need be for the occasion.

And yes, I will keep harping on cost. Manticore does not sweat out SD(P)'s. They're stupendously expensive.

Consider Firebrand's operations destabilizing Verge planets. The Verge resistance movements get lots of modern equipment, far beyond their wildest dreams of what they can afford on their own - more than enough to fully equip the Queen's Own. (At least the ground gear - we're not counting stingships etc. there.) All of that is chump change, trivial, compared to the cost of the space support they'd need in case of Frontier Fleet intervention. What would that space support be? Perhaps two destroyers. So - equip the Queen's Own for the tiniest fraction of the cost of two destroyers. And two destroyers would be the tiniest fraction of the cost of a superdreadnought.

So Manticore, with all its wealth, with all its protectiveness of the monarch, has historically decided, and done well with, spending the tiniest fraction of the tiniest fraction of the cost you'd expect them to now as a matter of course - to frustrate a kind of assassination that's been tried once and half-successful based on tricks they didn't know about before and do know about now and can address with vastly less expense.

cthia wrote:The death of the Queen has the potential to kill the war effort at any time. Especially at the politically-critical right/wrong time. Heck, the changing of the Prime Minister accomplished the same task.

JeffEngel wrote:Yes. Is that an argument for government by committees of people who are kept scattered in secured underground locations all the time? If not, there will still be risks run, and it's relevant to consider the likelihood of measures to be relevant and their costs versus the likely reward for employing them. If so, well, we're off on a deeper tangent.

Yet our very own government does keep the President underground, when need be. And an adequate compliment of officials to ensure that the current government is not decapitated and continues to run smoothly. When the President ventures out there's a horde of Secret Service upon Secret-Secret Service and a parade of vehicles NOT carrying the President acting as a decoy to the parade of vehicles carrying the real President with F-16s on high alert and more of the SS guys already set up at the location where the President is headed with snipers all along the route.
It's worth noting that some of those preparations are in case security fails. They'd not be relevant if we thought it worthwhile to provide so much security that failure was inconceivable. And a lot of those resources are tapped just for the occasion, then back to routine, unrelated work. The U.S. president does not have a nuclear carrier for overseas travel, and that's the analog for an SD yacht.
AFO is NOT a cheap vehicle or cheap to operate. All of the constant security measures implemented to protect our President including AFO comes at a horrendous cost to our taxpayers. Not a single American would propose to begin cutting costs there.
I don't know about that, particularly if the President is of the other party.... But aside from that, one nice plane isn't comparable to the SD yacht. We're differing over the scale of expense. You either don't seem to get how pricey SD's are, or don't think that any expense whatever should be spared if it could conceivably - or even inconceivably! - be relevant to the monarch's protection.
If a personal force field was developed for individuals but the overall cost was considered astronomical, do you seriously doubt that the President would be outfitted at the expense of the taxpayers?
Yes. Absolutely. Obviously. "So - college education for everyone, free to them - or a bubble for the Prez?" It'd be sick to opt for that force field. Treasonous. Utterly, hatefully, shamefully contemptible.
cthia wrote:And surely Protector Benjamin and Grayson doesn't share your thoughts of resources being squandered or the Protector's Own would be a part of the Navy.

JeffEngel wrote:They'd be accepting your argument only if the Protector's Own were perpetually on duty as Benjamin's bodyguards - in which case Thunderbolt would have destroyed Sidemore Station and Admiral Harrington.
That's exactly what they were comfortable with. When Benjamin sent Protector's Own away to assist Honor he did it on his own authority, IIRC. He stated himself that if the truth of that got out it'd cause a ruckus. That was discussed with Honor.
He did it because he considered an attack by Haven as a serious threat, and the Protector's Own out there would make a difference in that case - or in keeping Allied interests served in case of things heating up with the Andermani in Silesia. It wasn't for the mere protection of a single woman. That would be obscene.
I truly do not know why we are arguing this Jeff. The richest system in the known galaxy can afford that type of private yacht to protect the Queen. Hauptman or his daughter will foot the cost and build the damn thing if the Queen or her government can't afford it. lol

But no need. Manticore agrees with me and finally sees the error of their ways...
HMS Duke of Cromarty was a modified Agamemnon-class battle cruiser of the Royal Manticoran Navy that served as a royal yacht for Queen Elizabeth III.

The regular battlecruiser hull that would become the Duke of Cromarty had already been laid down by the time the previous yacht, HMS Queen Adrienne, was destroyed by Masadan terrorists in 1915 PD. Determined not to allow a similar incident to happen again, the new High Ridge government ordered a warship to be converted into the next Royal yacht.

On the suggestion of First Lord of the Admirality Edward Janacek, the armored forward bulkhead of its pod core was moved further aft, cutting the ship's missile supply in half, in order to create space for state passenger cabins, conference rooms, and even a formal ballroom. Otherwise, the Duke of Cromarty was a fully capable warship with state-of-the-art weapons, defences, and electronic warfare capability. (HH9, Infodump)

When HMS Hexapuma and HMS Warlock returned to the Manticore System after the successful yet costly Battle of Monica, they were greeted by the Home Fleet in Coronation Day formation, in the presence of the queen aboard Duke of Cromarty. (SI1) --wiki

You do realize you're praising a High Ridge Government decision, right? One that no Cromarty Government had considered. I don't think the Janacek Admiralty made a mistake with every single decision, but even that is a view I've got to defend around these parts. And that move was made to demonstrate the High Ridge Government's loyalty and devotion to the Queen - something we readers know more than better enough to believe was the least bit sincere.
Top

Return to Honorverse