Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

Hypothetical match up KH vs Dreadnought

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Hypothetical match up KH vs Dreadnought
Post by gamarus   » Wed Oct 01, 2014 7:05 am

gamarus
Lieutenant Commander

Posts: 149
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:52 pm
Location: Denmark

Dilandu wrote:
cralkhi wrote:I wonder if they really could enrich uranium? IIRC there wasn't much gap between getting the theory straight and actually doing it in RL, so if somebody handed the Charisians the theory...


In theory, it is possible by purely chemical methods. Actually... i didn't thik it would really work, but after all - we have Merlin to do it! :)

And there is the so-called "natural nuclear reactors".




The natural reactors did not enrich uranium. In fact, they ran on the then available higher fraction of U235. In the times since, U235 has decayed to a greater degree than U238 and today you need to somehow bring that ratio up to the level of self-sustaining chain reactions.
Or you could just go with a much younger planet... If Safehold was, say, only 3 billion years old, the natural ratio would be such that under the right conditions you could sustain a nuclear reaction...
Top
Re: Hypothetical match up KH vs Dreadnought
Post by runsforcelery   » Wed Oct 01, 2014 7:15 am

runsforcelery
First Space Lord

Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:39 am
Location: South Carolina

Dilandu wrote:No, i'm also tired of that. Please, if it suddenly appeared that KH's have a nuclear projectiles for their guns or equipped with "Standart" missiles - just tell me that it is your point. ;)


It was established (two books ago, I think) that Howsmyn had developed face hardening techniques. It was also established that he had a source for the nickel being used, that he had the formulation, that he's been making high quality steel for at least five years now, that he's producing steel in greater quantities and shorter time requirements than he'd previously been producing iron (far less wrought iron for composite armor), and that he has the rolling mill to produce armor of (I believe) up to 10" in thickness (having started with about 3" thicknesses). The armor on the Delthak class ironclads was face hardened, and the capability was specifically discussed in relation to the original King Haarahld design when the reasoning behind the originally specified armor thicknesses was discussed. Didn't "just appear" anywhere. In fact, none of the features of these ships "just appeared" anywhere. Every one of them (except the power plant) is the direct, logical consequence of a development process which has been going on since before Howsmyn was ever admitted to the inner circle, and the steam plant --- and the pressures at which it operates --- have been a part of the development process since (I believe) the first book in which he did become part of the inner circle.


"Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as Piglet came back from the dead.
Top
Re: Hypothetical match up KH vs Dreadnought
Post by kbus888   » Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:03 am

kbus888
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1980
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:58 pm
Location: Eastern Canada

=2014/10/01=
Hi Guys

Lately, for this thread, the phrase "flogging a dead horse" springs to mind.

Just my impression -- no insult intended :D

R
.
..//* *\\
(/(..^..)\)
.._/'*'\_
.(,,,)^(,,,)

Love is a condition in which
the happiness of another
is essential to your own. - R Heinlein
Top
Re: Hypothetical match up KH vs Dreadnought
Post by Dilandu   » Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:12 am

Dilandu
Admiral

Posts: 2542
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Russia

I'm not arguing anymore. I only ask to warn me whtn the other technology that need a highly specific industry, specific industrial tools, highly trained personnel and enormous ammount of time, resources and money would JUST SUDDENLY appeared as some insignificant detail.

P.S. Poor french, italian, russian and even american (periodically) naval engineers of the late XIX century. For them, the Harvey and Krupp Cemented armour didn't just SUDDENLY appeared, and they were forced to build ships with older types of armour even when the new types were avaliable for some time...
------------------------------

Oh well, if shortening the front is what the Germans crave,
Let's shorten it to very end - the length of Fuhrer's grave.

(Red Army lyrics from 1945)
Top
Re: Hypothetical match up KH vs Dreadnought
Post by Duckk   » Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:20 am

Duckk
Site Admin

Posts: 4201
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:29 pm

It didn't "suddenly appear". Harveyized steel was mentioned as far back as MT&T.
-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope
Top
Re: Hypothetical match up KH vs Dreadnought
Post by Dilandu   » Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:34 am

Dilandu
Admiral

Posts: 2542
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Russia

Duckk wrote:It didn't "suddenly appear". Harveyized steel was mentioned as far back as MT&T.


I'm not arguing anymore. But it appeared that the Langhorne truly was Archangel after all: his holy name could do real miracles! ;)
------------------------------

Oh well, if shortening the front is what the Germans crave,
Let's shorten it to very end - the length of Fuhrer's grave.

(Red Army lyrics from 1945)
Top
Re: Hypothetical match up KH vs Dreadnought
Post by OlorinNight   » Wed Oct 01, 2014 10:38 am

OlorinNight
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 7:10 am
Location: Bruxelles (Belgium)

Dilandu wrote:
Duckk wrote:It didn't "suddenly appear". Harveyized steel was mentioned as far back as MT&T.


I'm not arguing anymore. But it appeared that the Langhorne truly was Archangel after all: his holy name could do real miracles! ;)


Dilandu, while you have made some very interesting point earlier, that between you and RFC, have shed lights upon some parts of the development of technology on Safehold, I'm sorry to say that now you are just getting silly.

RFC has told us very clearly what was the real technological level of Safehold pre-Merlin, and the reasons why it evolves the way it does...

And yet you keep going back to old earth comparison again and again, when it has been made very clear that this kind of comparison is in fact not as relevant as one could hope, for multiple reasons. I'll try to give back some of them just below, but I'll probably forget some anyway:

- Safehold technology level pre-Merlin can not be seen anywhere in old earth history. Firstly, it is more or less homogeneous (at least, much more than what is still the case here on earth) on the surface of Safehold. Secondly, while on certain point they were closer to 16th-17th century (artillery, naval warfare,...), on other point they were more on a 19th century level (industrial or preindustrial production,...). A system like that will thus NEVER evolve like old earth Evolved;

- the Charisian empire is under the control of people aware that technology is their best chance to win against a more numerous Church, and having the will and the means to implement a strong, coherent and targeted research programm in order to develop the weapons to beat this ennemy. If I remember correctly, no 19th century country on old earth had programms that much structured;

- thanks to their access to OWL, they have Inside knowledge on how such a programm has to be made to be successful. So not only are they building a coherent research programm, but they are also making it in the right way from the start;

- thanks to OWL database again, they have access to numerous technology, the way to develop them and a computer able to run simulations and double check calculus if needed. So, not only are they building their research programms in the most optimal way possible to them, they can also, take shortcut in the actual development of certain number of their research, making it shorter to get something than what it took us here on good old earth;

Whan you take those points into account, it seems clear to me that comparison to old earth rate of development is not the best way to do things, and, while things are indeed going a little bit fast IMO, nothing came "out of nowhere" as you seem to imply.
Top
Re: Hypothetical match up KH vs Dreadnought
Post by Dilandu   » Wed Oct 01, 2014 10:59 am

Dilandu
Admiral

Posts: 2542
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Russia

I'm not arguing anymore.
------------------------------

Oh well, if shortening the front is what the Germans crave,
Let's shorten it to very end - the length of Fuhrer's grave.

(Red Army lyrics from 1945)
Top
Re: Hypothetical match up KH vs Dreadnought
Post by Potato   » Wed Oct 01, 2014 11:05 am

Potato
Captain of the List

Posts: 478
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 9:27 pm

"I reject your reality and substitute my own!"

:roll:
Top
Re: Hypothetical match up KH vs Dreadnought
Post by Dilandu   » Wed Oct 01, 2014 11:25 am

Dilandu
Admiral

Posts: 2542
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Russia

Potato wrote:"I reject your reality and substitute my own!"

:roll:



No' i simply think thst if both sides in discussion was unable to persuade the other, then the discussion is pointless: the arguments of both sides is simply unsufficient to do the job. So it's better to stop the discussion before it make way to conflict.
------------------------------

Oh well, if shortening the front is what the Germans crave,
Let's shorten it to very end - the length of Fuhrer's grave.

(Red Army lyrics from 1945)
Top

Return to Safehold