smr wrote:1) 36 years ago and no proof that will stand up in court.
Contemporaneous accounts from other people are beginning to come out. Polygraph results may not be admissible in court but she took one and passed it. She told her therapist about this years ago, long before Kavanaugh was ever in the running to be on the Supreme Court. Those women the GOP rounded up to make sign a letter supporting Kavanaugh are backpedaling fast in large numbers.
That may or may not all add up to a *prosecutable* case but it isn't nothing smr... do you really not give a crap if someone who did what was described in this accusation gets a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the country?
Are you that freaking far gone morally in your Trump worship?
2) a registered democrat that feels it's her civic duty but declines to press charges. We heard that before Alabama. 3) Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill demonstrate that the Demoncrats will stop at nothing to derail the SCOTUS process.
Yeeeeah.... most people take a slightly different view of those events.
4) Feinstein sat on letter since July only releases the letter when they are going to lose.
Actually she only released it when news she had it leaked, she was going to sit on it the whole time because apparently she's freaking clueless and didn't think it was "appropriate" to bring "personal life issues" into the confirmation process. As if a Supreme Court candidate possibly being an attempted rapist was irrelevant.