Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests

GA Strategy, Tactics and Targets

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: GA Strategy, Tactics and Targets
Post by phillies   » Fri May 30, 2014 11:48 am

phillies
Admiral

Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:43 am
Location: Worcester, MA

biochem wrote:Given the level of incompetence and arrogance exhibited to date by senior brass from the SL it would not surprise me at all to find that complete and total external access is allowed with a single password protected entry and that the password is the word "password".


This leads to an amusing technique that might allow a DD to take out substantial numbers of SLN SDs. Find SDs in orbit around planet being resupplied. Put missiles inside boxes that look adequately like robot cargo transporters. Coast them into appropriate orbits--you may need drones to fly them, leaving the missile fusactor inactive.. Have them give the right password. That's "password1" Land them inside the cargo bays. When all the armored doors close, the warheads detonate.

Internal detonation of a 45 MT warhead in his space should really annoy the Supply CPO.
Top
Re: GA Strategy, Tactics and Targets
Post by lyonheart   » Fri May 30, 2014 1:14 pm

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hi SYED,

We don't know what else Beowulf has in its weapon's locker.

Apollo and Mycroft are such overwhelming easy answers, that all previous preparations pale by comparison.

But improved LAC's have been suggested before and no textev disputes the possibility.

L


SYED wrote:WHile hyper capable ships would be seen as coersion, they could simply borrow alot of pods and LAC. They could do alot of damage even before moriaty is fully installed.
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: GA Strategy, Tactics and Targets
Post by WLBjork   » Fri May 30, 2014 1:22 pm

WLBjork
Commander

Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:45 am

phillies wrote:
biochem wrote:Given the level of incompetence and arrogance exhibited to date by senior brass from the SL it would not surprise me at all to find that complete and total external access is allowed with a single password protected entry and that the password is the word "password".


This leads to an amusing technique that might allow a DD to take out substantial numbers of SLN SDs. Find SDs in orbit around planet being resupplied. Put missiles inside boxes that look adequately like robot cargo transporters. Coast them into appropriate orbits--you may need drones to fly them, leaving the missile fusactor inactive.. Have them give the right password. That's "password1" Land them inside the cargo bays. When all the armored doors close, the warheads detonate.

Internal detonation of a 45 MT warhead in his space should really annoy the Supply CPO.


Nah, just bring the wedge up. That will really ruin their day!
Top
Re: GA Strategy, Tactics and Targets
Post by lyonheart   » Fri May 30, 2014 1:24 pm

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hi SYED,

Actually, the league will be hard pressed to replace lost supplies let alone bases or stations like Meyers that Mike took.

While HA-H will obviously lead one fleet to destroy the SLN bases, reserves, and infrastructure after Beowulf is attacked, there will be several other fleets made up of and commanded by the RHN, GSN and BSDF, since taking out the BF reserve before it can be moved or transferred would be one reason for celerity.


L


SYED wrote:From the books, it sound like the navy has a whole network of bases in the league, where a great deal of their assets and stores are located.
I always thought that if the logistics in the verge were destroyed, it would really hurt the raiding idea, but I realises the league would just provide more. The league realises it can't stop their forces, they will need to avoid battle. Imagine if honor led an alliance fleet on raids like she did on lovat. There is fear attackin would unite the league so why not simply target purly military outpost and infrastructure. Use it as an excuse to shatter all the slavery it can find.
Blame it all on attacking beowolf
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: GA Strategy, Tactics and Targets
Post by lyonheart   » Fri May 30, 2014 1:46 pm

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hi WhiteCold,

Actually we have textev and pearls that the BSDF hasn't built new ships to prevent giving a clue to the SLN, not for any budget concern, so where did that idea pop up from?

Beowulf is quite wealthy, as all the textev shows, with a large merchant fleet and SDF NTM excellent R&D throughout the sciences.

All SL members are responsible for their own defenses, guaranteed free to create whatever force they want.

2/3 have only LAC's, perhaps only 20% of the rest have serious SDF's, yet with dependance upon the SLN is now so uncertain where will the 'unwise virgins' when it comes to self defense go?

L


Whitecold wrote:
SYED wrote:Beowolf could not alter their whole fleet to manticore standards as it would have alerted the legue, but using the lessons learned from the manties and haven, they could auugement their systems to be better than the league. who would care if they upgraded their LAC?


But why would they? Beowulf did not saw this coming, and LAC's still are not cheap if you build enough to accomplish anything, especially factoring in the R&D effort.
Beowulf did not do nothing with the lessons learned because it would have alerted the SLN, but because they were unwilling to let their military budget explode, especially when external security was still not the BSDF's task but the SLN's.
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: GA Strategy, Tactics and Targets
Post by lyonheart   » Fri May 30, 2014 1:57 pm

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hello Brigade XO,

The Beowulf EE has been debated before, yet nothing from the Detweilers suggests that's their capability or intention.

Indeed RFC has posted here that it's not going to happen, though who knows, perhaps a Beowulf belter station might get hit or some other definitely civilian habitat etc that ruins the SLN's reputation.

L


Brigade XO wrote:As outlined in the books, Beowulf and Manticore face a political and public relations problem (with the SL population) if Manticore is sitting at the system edge (other than in hyper) or deploys- even at public Beowulf open request- in system with the BSDF.

That sets of the possibility that BF can smash their way in and "save" Beowulf from the nefarious macinations and strong-arm tactics of the dastardly Manties even if it means using 400 BF SDs to destroy the BSDF to do it. The Mandarins certainly see it this way with enough (probably most) of the senior officers of the SLN to set this plan in motion. The Mandarins are or have (in their own minds) painted themselves into a bad corner and at this point none of their political careers are going to last if Beowulf withdraws from the SL since they are sure (probably correctly) the Beowulf leaving will be the first slip of an avalanche and the SL "government" will effectivly be gutted along with the League itself.

Unless sanity breaks out in the powers controling the SL government, the only thing Beowulf and Manticore can do is give Beowulf as much mussle and defence capability as possible without having the Manticore fleet sitting there in the system. This is working to further the Alignment plan as Beowulf (and the League) are both screwed if the SLN does show up to either "insure free elections" or overturn the "obviously flawed and phoney results of the plebiscite forced under direct military threat by the Manties".

The idea being bumped around that it would also be a "good idea" to have one or more missile hit Beowulf at some signifcant fraction of C in the middle of any engagement do more than only cause massive distruction and loss of life on Beowulf. I would suspect that the Alignment will try to arrange for "proof" that it was a SLN weapon that went in and NOT BY ACCIDENT. SL and SLN credibility goes bang along with Beowulf.
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: GA Strategy, Tactics and Targets
Post by lyonheart   » Fri May 30, 2014 2:13 pm

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hi Phillies,

I love the "password1" and "passwordpassword" ideas! :lol:

Unfortunately given all the boat bays and airlocks are open to space, its unnecessary.

While small delivery drones are possible and humorous, and I've often suggested Mistletoe laserheads, speculation that GA LAC's will simply shoot through rows and columns of SD's etc seems most likely.

If the average reserve 'anchorage' is ~1200 SD's that's only a rough cube 12 X 10 X 10, so even with 1000 km radius each, its still a relatively small volume, that even a single RMN CLAC could handle in about one graser volley.

Given their relative stealth, the SLN won't even see them coming.

L

phillies wrote:
biochem wrote:Given the level of incompetence and arrogance exhibited to date by senior brass from the SL it would not surprise me at all to find that complete and total external access is allowed with a single password protected entry and that the password is the word "password".


This leads to an amusing technique that might allow a DD to take out substantial numbers of SLN SDs. Find SDs in orbit around planet being resupplied. Put missiles inside boxes that look adequately like robot cargo transporters. Coast them into appropriate orbits--you may need drones to fly them, leaving the missile fusactor inactive.. Have them give the right password. That's "password1" Land them inside the cargo bays. When all the armored doors close, the warheads detonate.

Internal detonation of a 45 MT warhead in his space should really annoy the Supply CPO.
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: GA Strategy, Tactics and Targets
Post by Imaginos1892   » Fri May 30, 2014 11:20 pm

Imaginos1892
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1332
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:24 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

WHY O WHY would Admiral Harrington - or anybody else - waste time and resources destroying the Sollies' mothballed ships? At this point even the ISLN knows they are nothing but hopelessly obsolete deathtraps; having them is an impediment, not an advantage.

There is also no need to go around shooting up planetary infrastructure, or even military assets. The ISLN, as it currently exists, is not a significant threat. Why waste time, resources and the moral high ground shooting up people who can't shoot back?

The only thing the Alliance needs to do is prevent the ISLN from obtaining ships that can be a threat. The most efficient way to do that is to spy on every system where those ships can be built, wait until they are almost complete, and then send in a modest fleet - say, 80 SD(P) and 60 CLAC, plus escorts - to blow them all to tiny bits.
-------------------
No boom?
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.
Top
Re: GA Strategy, Tactics and Targets
Post by SYED   » Sat May 31, 2014 2:09 am

SYED
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1345
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:03 pm

the destruction of the ships is not a military goal, but a publicity and economic goals. the ships would likely be stored in a shipyard, where there is major infrastructure and industry. Also, the league is attempting to keep control of the situation. if all known space was shown that the alliance can come in and wreak stuff at will, they will demand protection. So they will be forced to supply ships to boost security.
There are very few proper fleets fir the SDS, but it is also known some of them are very advanced, more so than the league. Would thoses systems with a proper fleet be likely to have the most advanced fleets available.
If they target the league fleet assest nearest those systems with a proper military, it would potentially allow for such systems to justify sending forces to secure the region, so make itt likely that they weould want to let the league fall as they could snap up riches.
Top
Re: GA Strategy, Tactics and Targets
Post by phillies   » Sat May 31, 2014 7:11 am

phillies
Admiral

Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:43 am
Location: Worcester, MA

I was thinking of garrison forces...eliminating mothballed ships qualifies as 'target practice exercise', but target practice with renewable grazers is good. However, I was thinking of people who could come to Red Alert and shoot back at LACs.

"bring up the wedge" use an amusing alternative to a warhead, though there might be energy conservation issues, namely the power source has to supply the energy to the wedge as it comes up in order to pull all those atoms apart from each other.

The reason you eliminate garrison forces is so that you can close on that point to, e.g., use energy weapons to destroy enemy freighters, use kinetic bombardment to eliminate major OFS garrisons, etc.

SYED wrote:the destruction of the ships is not a military goal, but a publicity and economic goals. the ships would likely be stored in a shipyard, where there is major infrastructure and industry. Also, the league is attempting to keep control of the situation. if all known space was shown that the alliance can come in and wreak stuff at will, they will demand protection. So they will be forced to supply ships to boost security.
There are very few proper fleets fir the SDS, but it is also known some of them are very advanced, more so than the league. Would thoses systems with a proper fleet be likely to have the most advanced fleets available.
If they target the league fleet assest nearest those systems with a proper military, it would potentially allow for such systems to justify sending forces to secure the region, so make itt likely that they weould want to let the league fall as they could snap up riches.
Top

Return to Honorverse