tlb wrote:If the kidnapper kills the hostage, because demands are not met, it is still the kidnapper that is legally and morally responsible for the death; not the person that refused those demands.
cthia wrote:That is like saying that an enemy who places landmines in your path is responsible for your death if you step on one, but you still haven't lifted your foot, yet, when there is a negotiation team (bomb squad) nearby to "negotiate" your release. Whatever you may think you think, the truth is that your life is now in your hands. Or rather your foot.
tlb wrote:The situation is not completely the same, since the final action in the kidnapper case is by the kidnapper (who could have decided to keep the hostage alive awhile longer - there is nothing that forces the death of the hostage).
Now you are simply arguing semantics. The point still stands. Beth stepped on a landmine, and her bomb squad can negotiate her release.
tlb wrote:In the case of the landmine, it would be my error if I lift my foot knowing that it is on a landmine; but a bomb squad is not in negotiation with the enemy, so that part of the analogy fails. It is more similar to rescuing the Queen by force.
On the contrary, as far as Beth is concerned, that damn landmine is the more immediate enemy!
tlb wrote:I thought I made it clear that while I might open communication, I will not acquiesce to demands; unlike you, I do not believe the Queen would be returned alive, no matter what I do do.
cthia wrote:Right back to you allowing The Queen of Manticore to die without firing at least one diplomatic shot. Because you have a hunch.
Riddle me this. If you agree to the demands and the Queen is not returned, what is lost besides the Queen?
tlb wrote:It depends on what I may have done in the mistaken belief that the Queen would be returned.
For example, imagine that they demand the plans for the miniature fusion reactor that powers our missiles. Then they refuse to return the Queen after verifying that the plans are accurate?
That is not in the ransom demands. The MA's request is somewhat reasonable.
I understand your reluctance to negotiate with this enemy. They might be stalling for time just like Saint-Just. But then, since their plans are off the rails, they may be actually planning to go straight. Probably not, but you can't afford not to give them that chance. When Eloise hypered into the MBS with her offer of an alliance, that could have been a ploy as well. But there comes a time when you have to know when to hold and know when to fold. Or simply know not to get busted so that you can live to play another hand.
If the MA turn out to be rats in the eyes of the entire galaxy, then what is the problem? You get to kick their ass after all.
The MA is like a cancer, you want to kill it, yes. But, like all aggressive cancers, if you fail to get it all it will come back with a vengeance.
Beth stepped on a landmine. And your final actions can free her. Worry about tomorrow when tomorrow comes.
I can imagine Beth's thoughts if she were a part of this negotiation ...
"Now hold on a minute you little warmonger. I
do want to live you know. No shame in that. There is a time and there is a place to fight. This is neither.
Her eyes narrow. "You're not even on my side. You're in the Opposition party! You want me dead! Get him out of here!"
It does beg the question. Who would be authorized to make that decision?
Also, we have no idea what glue the Soul of Steel wields to keep her government functioning. There is no guarantee that Beth's successor will command the same power or allegiance. You don't want to find out the hard way just how valuable an asset you gave up.