Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 55 guests

Some tech questions

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Some tech questions
Post by Theemile   » Fri Aug 20, 2021 1:15 pm

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5068
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

Joat42 wrote:
Brigade XO wrote:Don't know if they are still doing it but back in the 50's and 60's the USSR would decide that they didn't want people to use various frequencies and hook up massive power sources to transmitters and essentially blot out the frequency with interference. Some of the rumors were that these were ones use by things like Voice of America or for clandestine transmissions to agents- that sort of thing.

Look up Duga or Russian Woodpeckers, most of these where just immensely powerful over-the-horizon (OTH) radars.


The US has a couple hidden in plain site as well . but these are really just long baseline backscattering devices.
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top
Re: Some tech questions
Post by ThinksMarkedly   » Fri Aug 20, 2021 4:38 pm

ThinksMarkedly
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4151
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 11:39 am

Theemile wrote:The US has a couple hidden in plain site as well . but these are really just long baseline backscattering devices.


There's a question whether that kind of jamming can work with a technique like direct-sequence spread spectrum. Since it's not a single frequency or a narrow band, you'd have to jam the entire spectrum, which means a great deal of energy.

Frequency Hopping SS is the simplest, but it's still a discrete set of frequencies. Yes, modern transmitters could use thousands of different discrete frequencies, but jamming all of them is a much simpler problem than jamming a full wideband channel.

DSSS was original designed by the military as both a technique to defeat jamming and to hide the transmissions in what appeared to be noise in the first place. The story goes that when the RN used it in the Falklands War, the Argentine Navy was completely baffled how the Brits were communicating in the first place, since they couldn't detect a transmission at all. (this may be apocryphal)
Top
Re: Some tech questions
Post by SharkHunter   » Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:37 pm

SharkHunter
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1608
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:53 pm
Location: Independence, Missouri

Playing "mini-RFC / ATC simulator programming" author type... I'd guess that at some point, the pulses could be futz'd up enough to mess with attack missile targeting. And program a simulation assuming that to be true. Problem being...

Even the best tech isn't all that great at detecting RMN/GA ships when thy are playing "holes in space", and it doesn't take a lot of pulses to reprogram the Apollo(s).

The 23-E is still immensely better at downrange targeting than anything else... and at some point the Foraker/Hemphill duo is going to up the accuracy gains even more. So I don't know HOW you figure out which pulses to scramble from where before a bunch of gigaton warheads start raining on your defensive parade.
---------------------
All my posts are YMMV, IMHO, and welcoming polite discussion, extension, and rebuttal. This is the HonorVerse, after all
Top
Re: Some tech questions
Post by ThinksMarkedly   » Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:21 pm

ThinksMarkedly
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4151
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 11:39 am

SharkHunter wrote:The 23-E is still immensely better at downrange targeting than anything else... and at some point the Foraker/Hemphill duo is going to up the accuracy gains even more. So I don't know HOW you figure out which pulses to scramble from where before a bunch of gigaton warheads start raining on your defensive parade.


Well, the first rule of space warfare: "if brute force isn't working, you're not using enough of it."
Top
Re: Some tech questions
Post by Theemile   » Thu Sep 02, 2021 12:48 pm

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5068
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

ThinksMarkedly wrote:
SharkHunter wrote:The 23-E is still immensely better at downrange targeting than anything else... and at some point the Foraker/Hemphill duo is going to up the accuracy gains even more. So I don't know HOW you figure out which pulses to scramble from where before a bunch of gigaton warheads start raining on your defensive parade.


Well, the first rule of space warfare: "if brute force isn't working, you're not using enough of it."


"Overkill? Are any of the enemy still alive? Then it wasn't Overkill - it wasn't even enough kill!"
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top
Re: Some tech questions
Post by Relax   » Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:30 pm

Relax
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3106
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:18 pm

Joat42 wrote:
Brigade XO wrote:Don't know if they are still doing it but back in the 50's and 60's the USSR would decide that they didn't want people to use various frequencies and hook up massive power sources to transmitters and essentially blot out the frequency with interference. Some of the rumors were that these were ones use by things like Voice of America or for clandestine transmissions to agents- that sort of thing.

Look up Duga or Russian Woodpeckers, most of these where just immensely powerful over-the-horizon (OTH) radars.


The USSR jammers of BBC/VoA did not work. Look no further than the Chernobyl disaster. 75% of 180 tons of irradiated Uranium was at minimum, by eyewitness accounts, sent into the atmosphere(greater volume than every single Nuclear bomb ever exploded by an order of magnitude or two if not three). VoA was "jammed" as soon as the disaster happened by USSR government, but people in Kiev could STILL get it but noisily and knew to stay indoors even though their government told them nothing for days while they listened to classical music instead of regular programming, all their buses/truck drivers disappeared, and the fancy cans on top of the Communist pile sent all their children to Moscow and St. Petersburg.

Either USSR Jammers were pitiful, or jammers are not exactly all they are cracked up to be for a human brain computer to distinguish words in a language they DO NOT know even through jamming noise.
_________
Tally Ho!
Relax
Top
Re: Some tech questions
Post by Joat42   » Thu Sep 02, 2021 3:32 pm

Joat42
Admiral

Posts: 2147
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:01 am
Location: Sweden

Relax wrote:Either USSR Jammers were pitiful, or jammers are not exactly all they are cracked up to be for a human brain computer to distinguish words in a language they DO NOT know even through jamming noise.

Well, the inverse square law is a bitch.

---
Jack of all trades and destructive tinkerer.


Anyone who have simple solutions for complex problems is a fool.
Top
Re: Some tech questions
Post by ThinksMarkedly   » Fri Sep 03, 2021 12:01 am

ThinksMarkedly
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4151
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 11:39 am

Theemile wrote:"Overkill? Are any of the enemy still alive? Then it wasn't Overkill - it wasn't even enough kill!"


Overkill is less of a problem than underkill...
Top
Re: Some tech questions
Post by Michael Everett   » Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:55 am

Michael Everett
Admiral

Posts: 2612
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:54 am
Location: Bristol, England

ThinksMarkedly wrote:
Theemile wrote:"Overkill? Are any of the enemy still alive? Then it wasn't Overkill - it wasn't even enough kill!"


Overkill is less of a problem than underkill...

"That which does not kill you has made a serious tactical error..."
~~~~~~

I can't write anywhere near as well as Weber
But I try nonetheless, And even do my own artwork.

(Now on Twitter)and mentioned by RFC!
ACNH Dreams at DA-6594-0940-7995
Top
Re: Some tech questions
Post by phillies   » Sat Sep 04, 2021 10:27 pm

phillies
Admiral

Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:43 am
Location: Worcester, MA

ThinksMarkedly wrote:
Theemile wrote:"Overkill? Are any of the enemy still alive? Then it wasn't Overkill - it wasn't even enough kill!"


Overkill is less of a problem than underkill...


Unless you do not have ammo resupply before the next engagement.
Top

Return to Honorverse