ThinksMarkedly wrote:Unless they're either desperate (close to losing) or so assured of victory soon that the loss of the strategic advantage won't hurt their plans. Since we know the latter won't happen, I don't think we see such extremely risky missions until the last book, if at all.
penny wrote:I just can't agree with that.
You yourself pointed out, rightfully so, that a lot of their tech may not get to be used but once. Sonja and Shannon both live in the garage.
[cut]
They can't afford to be timid if it is going to be a short victorious war. The MA needs short! They cannot launch a campaign of attrition by destroying infrastructure from the edge of the system until someone gets a read on their tech.
An LD can't be captured if the enemy is dead.
It's not a disagreement in tactics as much as a disagreement on conditions, or perception of conditions. We're in agreement that if you expect the war to be long, you can't afford to lose your advantages early on. That would make it short, but with an unsuitable outcome.
I don't see the Plan calling for a Short Victorious War either. So the LDs wouldn't have been designed for a short war. All the doctrine the MAN would have been preparing for the last decade would call for a long war and less risky uses of those capital ships. I think you'll agree with me so far.
And I'll agree with you that they may find themselves in a condition where they need a short war. They may indeed realise that Sonja and Shannon (who are at the top of the Colin's Must Assassinate ASAP list) will find counters to any technological advantages that the MAN may possess, so they can't afford a long war and be assured of victory. If that is the conclusion of the Inner Onion, then I do agree with you that they may risk the capital ships in ways they weren't designed for.