This doesn't prove anything other than 6 million was the generally accepted population estimate.
Google has removed both the "are jews evil" and "are muslims bad" from their autocomplete. You can find all kinds of crazy things in the autocomplete because it's based on what people have searched. When people tell Google about things like those, Google usually removes them. This doesn't prove anything.
I can't find anything that shows these people are facebook moderators, it looks like a random group of people. And in any case, 90 people aren't anywhere near enough to moderate a site as big as Facebook.
RedBaron wrote:Facebook Moderators
========================================================
[URL snipped for length]
I don't understand what point you're trying to make with this statement.
RedBaron wrote:NOTE: So far, every member that I've checked that has "LAST.WARNING" in the URL has been located in ISRAEL.
YouTube has a
hate speech policy and just from the titles of several videos in that list, it would be reasonable for them to remove due to violation of that policy.
Not only that, YouTube is a company and has every right to determine what is and is not on their website. If they want to be a "pro-Israel" organization, they have every right to (NOTE: I am not saying this is the case, this is a hypothetical
only).
RedBaron wrote:And here is a playlist of videos showing some of the things Israelis do that they don't want people to see - many of them have been targeted and deleted by israel (and subsequently reuploaded)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STwDiHQ ... 62&index=12 days ago (when I last checked that playlist) there were 54 videos.... NOW there are only 37 - 38 if you include the recently deleted one.
I'm not going to argue on what is and is not antisemitism and if accusations of antisemitism are or are not used to dismiss critics.
What I will say is that Israel is a country that has been invaded by every one of it's neighbors in the last 50 years. So it is
understandable that they and their supporters would use anything they can to assist them in public relations. I'm not saying whether or not that's what happens or if I agree, only that it makes sense.
I will also note that Godwin-ing any argument devolves the whole discussion (RE: Ecuador's UN Ambassador's comparison of Zionism to Nazism).
You've said nothing of what the content of the video was nor anything supporting the premise that "israeli pressure" caused it to be removed.
It seems to me that all of the evidence you've provided is coming from a perspective that there is a "problem", which leads to confirmation bias.
The other issue with most of what you posted is that none of it is primary sources and several don't even cite a primary source.
That and the fact that so many people (as you've no doubt seen on this topic) go to great lengths to defend Israel no matter what they do.