Eyal wrote:HB of CJ wrote:Back in 1775, less than three percent of our American Colonists wanted to start the shooting. Probably less that that actually picked up a rifled musket or owned a light cannon. Our founding revolution was nasty and bloody. Lots of bad shiet went around and around. Both sides. All sides. Most just wanted to be left alone.
Considering the population at the time, three percent were not all that many. Figuring 10 million armed law abiding citizens today could, if they were forced to, might start a LEGAL revolt. We have probably 100 million armed citizens in the USA and nearly all of them never go out and kill people. A few, but not many. More die by accidents. Many more from cars. Many many more from disease.
There are only about 220,000 legal automatic weapons in the USA. Guess what? Since 1932 there have been only less than six documented crimes committed by these armed citizens using THEIR OWN LEGAL REGISTERED MACHINE GUN. Six times over 80 years. It is a non event. Does not happen. An armed society is a protected and polite society. But then a gun does not have the range or power of sweet and pleasant dreams and false security of nanny states.
It has become apparent that the slaves and sheeple will remain slaves and sheeple. It may be beyond their large comfort zone to even think such reactionary thoughts such as liberty and freedom. If such words piss off the slaves and sheeple so be it. I cut to the mark and let the chips fall where they may.
Respect must be earned. I will not give it out freely. Sosss ... maybe it is NOT true when I say "respectfully" to some on this science fiction literary forum. Some here have not earned it. Take it or leave it. I do not care either way. GUNS GUNS GUNS right in your face. Non respectfully to some.
Respectfully to the rest. An excellent Science Fiction Writers Forum. All Oregon State, US Code Laws And NFA Rules Apply.
Moderator: Consider banning some of this forum's sheeple, slaves and nanny state sit-at-homes. They are so pacified they do not have a clue. Or ... ban me if you want to kill the messenger. I for one have have just about enough shiet here from some. This excellent forum needs to trim back the sub forums.
You didn't actually answer his objections...smr wrote:Many of globalist/utopians want everyone in the US to be disarmed. For Gun seizure to happen, they have to go door to door to take the weapons and that means a civil war. Take what happened with the shootings in Dallas. The American government now has the legal right to use a robot to kill a suspect with a bomb...the legal precedent was set! That is the most scary fact of all and most people do not even realize that fact. The legal precedent has been set by the Dallas police department using a robot to drop a bomb to kill a suspect. Where is the outcry from our own media.
If a police sniper had shot him instead, would your objection still stand?The E wrote:Why is it that every time you decide you had enough of people not agreeing with you that you try to run to the authorities to get your opinions enforced?
Calling for government intervention, in other words?
