cthia wrote:I always wanted more POV of McQueen. In her early years, as part of Operation Stalking Horse her Task Force 30 hit the understrength Minette system.
Task Force Minette-01 was a task force of the Royal Manticoran Navy in charge of picketing and defending the Minette System.
It was commanded by Vice Admiral of the Red Ludwig Stanton.
⦁ HMS Majestic, Captain George Truscot commanding, task force flagship
⦁ HMS Orion
⦁ a cruiser element, including:
⦁ HMS Seeress
⦁ HMS Oracle
⦁ a destroyer elementSeeing the overwhelming forces arrayed against him, Admiral Stanton decided to withdraw rather than sacrifice his command. He ordered the evacuation of all technical personnel, and the scuttling of Tracking Central as well as all inner-system platforms, so that the FTL sensor net technology would not fall into Havenite hands. He then planned to pass the PN on the way out, firing as many missiles as he could at their superdreadnoughts in order to ease the ability of a counterattack to take the system. Before moving out he contacted the Premier of Everest to inform him of his intentions.
During the withdrawal, Stanton's forces managed to destroy one superdreadnought, heavily damage another, and destroyed a battlecruiser, in return for heavy damage to two dreadnoughts (HMS Majestic and Orion) as well as losing four heavy cruisers. (HH5)
I remember this sticking in my craw. I hated it each time the RMN had to destroy its own resources. (I don't recall the RHN ever doing that. Did I miss any such event?) At any rate, what I cannot figure out is why this system was left so threadbare, so understrength. Well, I know the strategic reasons why. Hamish needed help by way of reinforcements for his Trevor's Star campaign. And McQueen wasn't even his opposition then. She was there, raising hell in Minette. What I ultimately don't understand is what was the importance of Minette? Obviously it was important because, in retreating and giving up the system, Admiral Stanton was looking ahead to strategically make reaquiring Minette easier with his en passant tactic. (This is a perfect example of the passed pawn idea on the chess board projected onto a real battle field, which was not lost on me.)
What really disturbs me is why FTL technology was employed throughout this system? I suppose as much advance warning as one can get would make for a more complete and safer evacuation, but all of the new technology is at risk - all of the FTL platforms seeded throughout the system. Why seed FTL platforms in an inadequately defended system? Beyond the fact that they're expensive systems, the RMN could not afford for the technology to fall into enemy hands.
Whatever happened to Vice Admiral Stanton?
-----------------
(1) I hated it each time the RMN had to destroy its own resources. (I don't recall the RHN ever doing that.) --
The PN hardware was generally inferior to the RMN / Alliance hardware, even at this time. Remember that the GSN SD's were heavily refit prior to re-activation; there just wasn't enough usable Havenite hardware to be of advantage. The primary gain the RMN got when capturing a PN ship intact was the captured intel -- either planning documents, ship ELINT signatures, etc.
Most captured PN ships were relegated to rear-area security.
(2) What really disturbs me is why FTL technology was employed throughout this system? -- I think of the early FTL technology as a parallel to early WWII Radar, cumbersome, limited (especially compared to later developments), but a tool to be USED whether along the Dover coast or in Hawaii and the Aleutians.
Eventually the Japanese and Germans (like the Havenites) developed their own versions -- physics is not nationalistic or nation-preferential.
(3) I thing VAdm Stanton fell into the Honorverse pit of missing minor characters -- see Screen Actors Guild extras pool.
-- Stewart