RHWoodman wrote:The research that Paul Piff has presented shows that statistically the people that are rich behave worse than the people that are poor. In the Monopoly game, the game is artificially rigged in favor of one player, and after a few rounds of play, the player in whose favor it is rigged begins behaving as if he or she is entitled to special treatment. In the automobile study, the drivers least likely to obey the law to stop at a crosswalk when a person is crossing are people driving BMWs, Mercedes, and other luxury cars.
I'm sure that most of us (perhaps all of us) can cite rich people who are nice and poor people who are mean. Piff's study isn't looking for individual exceptions but for the statistical norms, and the statistical norm uncovered in Piff's research is that rich people are rude, unethical, and/or dishonest, while poor people are polite, ethical, and/or honest.
And I repeat, in my view that holds for societies to an even greater extent. In a society with 40% or greater unemployment, you should not expect the poor to be honest or generous. They are fighting like hell for their next meal.
About the study, let me digress a little. I recently played a computer game and when I switched the difficulty level to "Hard", the game logic responded not by being smarter, but by producing a statistically unlikely series of dice throw to try and win. That ticked me off to the point that I deleted the game. Does that make me dishonest and rude? I just despise cheating, no matter where it is coming from.
Finally, about driving a luxury car, German or otherwise. In South Africa I rode a motorcycle for many years, and learned to keep away from luxury cars. But where I live right now in the US, the cars I have to look out for are large pickups and SUV's. And I have noticed that many of those drivers take particular pleasure in being as obstructive as possible to German cars as well.
When I studied statistics in college, our lecturer made a point of emphasizing that we should not believe statistics: they are too easily shaped to reflect the view of the author. Always look at the methodology, and where possible the raw numbers I was told. And that I do believe.