Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest

Draining Clyntahn's mind

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Draining Clyntahn's mind
Post by Bluesqueak   » Sat Sep 30, 2017 8:16 am

Bluesqueak
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2016 2:04 pm

Loren Pechtel wrote:
Bluesqueak wrote:Applying this to Clyntahn, the danger is that he would, to stop the pain, tell the Inner Circle all sbout the Thing In The Basement - even if he hasn't actually got a clue and is just making up some plausible rubbish, based on his knowledge of secret Inquisition files. Just as the Inquisition always found themselves uncovering conspiracies that didn't exist.

But I still stand by my earlier comment. Torture works in a short term, tactical sense. From a strategic point of view, it's frequently a disaster.


They have the verifier. The big problem with torture is knowing when you got the truth (including "I don't know the answer".) They don't have that problem.


Actiually, the big problem with torture is that you don't want to live in a society that uses torture - I generally find that the people enthusiastic about using torture are often the people who never think it will happen to them. RFC uses this trope quite a lot in Safehold. Torture, most Safeholdian's think, is unpleasant but okay because the Archangels ordained that it would only happen to those who deserve it. Then he proceeds to demonstrate just how very, very wrong they were about that.

Yes, they have the verifier. Yes, it would work if Clyntahn was actively lying. No, it wouldn't work if Clyntahn thought what they wanted to hear was true. Verification only works, as I understand it, on belief. If someone believes in the Archangels, the verifier won't tell you they're lying, because they're not. If Clyntahn suddenly 'realises' that An OtherThing In The Basement is what his torturers want, he'll happily tell the Inner Circle about it. Pity that it was really Chihiro's secret plan to blast Safehold back to the Stone Age, and that Chihiro forgot to mention that part...

But basically, the problem is strategic, not tactical. A lot of posters really are fixating on the short term tactical value - Clyntahn tells all- and missing that the Inquisition is the poster child for the long term strategic consequences.
Top
Re: Draining Clyntahn's mind
Post by peke   » Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:14 am

peke
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2013 2:24 pm

In this instance, the Stone of Schueler would not be a surefire way of telling truth from falsehood. We have textev from book one, in the mini-infodump about the verifier, that mental illnesses and conditions produce contradictory readings. Couple that with the fact that for the whole series (usually in an inner monologue from Duchairn) we've been getting hit with Clinton's increasingly deranged personality, and his tendency to actuallty believe his own lies.

An excellent study case for a Bedardist, indeed.
------------------------------------------------------
There is no problem so complex that it cannot be solved through the judicious application of high-power explosives.
Top
Re: Draining Clyntahn's mind
Post by MrZero   » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:59 am

MrZero
Ensign

Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 12:21 am

There wasn't any mention of any interrogation, just Clyntahn griping about the trial. A court trial, whereas Clyntahn complains that he's been captured by people too week-kneed to interrogate/torture him.
As for the "use the brain machine" option, we don't know when (or if) he was injected with it. Still, with three months of sitting on his kiester that would give the nanotech a lot of time to settle into his brain. A lot of time for a passive reading and recording, very different then the "wham bam thank you ma'am" that happened to Nahrman. And when the rope goes twang, still plenty of time to turn on the harsher strip-mine-method and read Clyntahn's brain like Nahrman's was. It's the only reason to wait three months that's actually useful. Sit him in the court and have a lot of people list his actions, hopefully activating memory centers of the brain.
Given the star trek level science that Weber never went deep in the box of tricks of, it's entirely possible for them to decapitate Clyntahn and keep him alive as just a head on a pillar of life support machines. Too bad that Weber's not the type to short-story a properly chaos filled
"They Saved Clyntahn's Brain!"
If you're going to reenact World War Two, you could at least start the pulp fiction, though anyone turning into the radio stories would just get killed by the orbital defense platform.
Top
Re: Draining Clyntahn's mind
Post by Hildum   » Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:30 pm

Hildum
Commander

Posts: 235
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:15 pm

n7axw wrote:I Know that RFC believes that torture works, although he acknowledges the moral issues with doing it. He is contradicted by others who say that it is unreliable and actually counter-productive since you end up with less useful info than if you had tried another way.

So... go figure. :?

Don

-


The real world evidence we have, Hollywood movies notwithstanding, is that torture is completely ineffective at getting reliable or actionable information, and has been clearly demonstrated to be counter productive. It is neither effective, moral, nor legal (at least until the Bush administration, and possibly the new Trump administration).

I regard Bush and all those that supported his position and the legal reasoning war criminals that should be prosecuted. Bush is the one that should be locked up, not Clinton.
Top
Re: Draining Clyntahn's mind
Post by n7axw   » Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:00 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4641
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 7:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Hildum wrote:
n7axw wrote:I Know that RFC believes that torture works, although he acknowledges the moral issues with doing it. He is contradicted by others who say that it is unreliable and actually counter-productive since you end up with less useful info than if you had tried another way.

So... go figure. :?

Don

-


The real world evidence we have, Hollywood movies notwithstanding, is that torture is completely ineffective at getting reliable or actionable information, and has been clearly demonstrated to be counter productive. It is neither effective, moral, nor legal (at least until the Bush administration, and possibly the new Trump administration).

I regard Bush and all those that supported his position and the legal reasoning war criminals that should be prosecuted. Bush is the one that should be locked up, not Clinton.



I am wholehheartedly agreement with your sentiments. But RFC has a lot of credibility with me. So if he says that torture works, I am not ready to completely dismiss his assertion. So my jury is still out. I am not well enough informed on the subject to draw a conclusion myself.

Don

-
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Draining Clyntahn's mind
Post by Isilith   » Mon Dec 11, 2017 10:02 pm

Isilith
Commander

Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:58 am

Hildum wrote:
n7axw wrote:I Know that RFC believes that torture works, although he acknowledges the moral issues with doing it. He is contradicted by others who say that it is unreliable and actually counter-productive since you end up with less useful info than if you had tried another way.

So... go figure. :?

Don

-


The real world evidence we have, Hollywood movies notwithstanding, is that torture is completely ineffective at getting reliable or actionable information, and has been clearly demonstrated to be counter productive. It is neither effective, moral, nor legal (at least until the Bush administration, and possibly the new Trump administration).

I regard Bush and all those that supported his position and the legal reasoning war criminals that should be prosecuted. Bush is the one that should be locked up, not Clinton.


Yeah, utter bullshit. The "real world" says that it does work, which is why we are taught to do our best to hold out under torture for 24-48 hours.

Now if it continues, you will friggin say ANYTHING to get it to stop, which is a another problem in and of itself.
Top

Return to Safehold