Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

The Navy of God against Charis naval superiority

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: The Navy of God against Charis naval superiority
Post by runsforcelery   » Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:45 am

runsforcelery
First Space Lord

Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:39 am
Location: South Carolina

Dilandu wrote:
That's what readers need to understand if they want to put the Safeholdian rate of progress into context with the historical rate of progress here on Earth in real life.


The main problem is a educated workforce. How many people in the Charis able to at least read and write?



Genuine literacy in Charis probably approaches 50% of the total population and more like 75% of the skilled work force. Why do you persist in trying to make this fit a terrestrial model? It specifically doesn't. You refer in your last post to the lack of a uniform standard of measurement. If someone in Charis is trying to make a part for a reaper in Siddarmark which was manufactured in Dohlar, this is going to be a major problem. If a particular manufacturer is making parts for hisreapers, with measurements consistent with his own in-house units, then it becomes as least as practicable for his manufactory as Eli Whitney's so-called "interchangeable parts" were for his rifle-making facility. When Charis needs to hugely expand its capacity, it exports a genuine system of standardized measures which replace the existing nonstandard measures. It's not as if they had to invent the concept of measurement from scratch, and with the Church getting behind and pushing, implementing the new standards sailed through pretty darned quickly. Yes, it was a problem for them for a couple of years, but it was building on a well established platform of concepts.

This isn't Earth; there is a much larger skilled work force even before Merlin comes along; the starting points for metallurgy and other aspects of the technological infrastructure are much further advanced (although by "rote" learning, in many respects) than you are willing to allow/grasp; and the technological tool box includes capabilities which are substantially more advanced than the starting point you seem to insist on imposing upon the planet. Let me try this one more time. Safehold didn't have to invent any of its basic pre-Merlin tech. It didn't have to figure out "how" it worked; it only had to accept that it worked because the Archangels taught them how to do it. That meant that Safeholdian artisans --- of which there were many times as many, proportionately, as any Old Earth preindustrial society could have supported because of the agricultural advantages which have been repeatedly pointed out --- had a very good practical knowledge of processes which took centuries to develop from scratch in our own experience. What Merlin and Howsmyn have done is to take that basis of existing, practical, "rule of thumb," "divinely inspired" capability and impose understanding of the "why" upon it, with the help of the Royal College and the enthusiastic support of the Church of Charis.

Whether Langhorne realized it or not, he stuffed Safehold full of the launch pad for a genuine industrial revolution because of the information packed into the Writ. The only things which kept his master plan from spinning out of control so long were (1) the fact that the Writ also provided a "divine" explanation for why things worked which precluded a systematic examination of processes and natural laws to figure out how to do things even better and (2) the fact that the Inquisition was riding shotgun on the Proscriptions and making sure no one transgressed them on any organized scale.

What part of that do you not understand?


"Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as Piglet came back from the dead.
Top
Re: The Navy of God against Charis naval superiority
Post by n7axw   » Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:50 am

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

I,for one, will admit that, with the possible exception of Charis, I had Safehold comparable more to 17th century Europe before the age of industrialization than to the 19th century.

I suspect what is happening here is that when we think of the Writ, we tend to think only in terms of the proscriptions rather than the guidance it provides in such areas as chemistry and agriculture. Much of what Safehold takes for granted, we on Earth had to figure out a step at a time.

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: The Navy of God against Charis naval superiority
Post by Castenea   » Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:12 am

Castenea
Captain of the List

Posts: 671
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:21 pm
Location: MD

runsforcelery wrote:
Sixth, you appear to be assuming that a 22'4" draft means that they can't come in close to engage coastal defenses. In most instances, they certainly can; if there isn’t deep water handy, people don’t tend to build heavy coastal fortifications that need heavy guns to suppress them. The King Haarahlds draw less than a foot more than USS Constitution, a 44-gun frigate built at the end of the 18th century, and more than 3 feet less than HMS Inflexible drew at Alexandria in 1882, and the water in most of the harbors where they are likely to be engaging heavy defenses is ample to permit them to come within point-blank range of the defenses. At that point, they will be effectively invulnerable to the shore guns and be able to engage targets ashore with 10" guns capable of penetrating 10” of Howsmynized steel armor and 8" guns capable of penetrating 7.5” of Howsmynized armor (all penetrations at 6,000 yards), each firing a round at least every 20-30 seconds or so as opposed to one round every 10 minutes or so. The current-generation Charisian 6" can penetrate only 4” of Howsmynized steel armor, by way of comparison between the weapons' performances.
To give a couple of illustrations of where most coastal defences are located. The primary coastal fort (there are two more) protecting Philadelphia PA (and Wilmington DE) is Fort Delaware located on Pea Patch Island in the Delaware River. The original brick fort is beside the main shipping channel and combined with the Fort on the NJ side of the river would have engaged any ships attempting to pass in a cross fire (cannons placed in both forts would have been capable of reaching the other fort). The fortifications of old San Juan PR have as their strong points El Morro which over looks the shipping channel (and held the heaviest guns), and San Cristobal which is the larger and more complex preventing overland attack. Fortunately San Juan's fortification were not subjected to the insults of Fort Delaware where three 12" rifles were installed that could fire down river. I believe that these guns were not installed because due to the cost of building the mounts and the priority afforded to PR meant that by the time they got to installing large disappearing guns there, the airplane had proved itself sufficiently that building airfields and stationing air wings there provided cheaper and more effective protection.
Top
Re: The Navy of God against Charis naval superiority
Post by Randomiser   » Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:21 am

Randomiser
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1452
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:41 pm
Location: Scotland

Dilandu wrote:
That's what readers need to understand if they want to put the Safeholdian rate of progress into context with the historical rate of progress here on Earth in real life.


The main problem is a educated workforce. How many people in the Charis able to at least read and write?


Dilandu , why don't you have a look at the FAQ titled 'Overview of education on Safehold' It's on the second page of the Safehold FAQ's
Top
Re: The Navy of God against Charis naval superiority
Post by laz   » Sat Sep 27, 2014 12:12 pm

laz
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2013 1:25 am

runsforcelery wrote:
Why do people persist in describing Safehold as "an industry that has only recently begun industrialization"?


Because we don't have access to your mind ;-) and what we know is the only yard stick we can measure by, in other words we are the CoG being dragged into the future by you the CoC :lol: .

Also laziness, i know i do a half assed search to see if anyone has broached an idea yet, and there is no index of your posts/nuggets with (new and improved) OWL to search them for us. And search and reading just take sooooo long not to mention comprehending, it makes my brain hurt, just easier to whip of a post with no research.


laz
Top
Re: The Navy of God against Charis naval superiority
Post by isaac_newton   » Sat Sep 27, 2014 5:50 pm

isaac_newton
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1182
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:37 am
Location: Brighton, UK

runsforcelery wrote:I will readily admit that I am making some optimistic assumptions about the process in Charis, but I don't think they are unreasonably optimistic. You may disagree, but my understanding of the starting point for the society and the planet I created as the backdrop for this entire story tells me that Charis' accomplishments — and the tsunami of shockwaves they are sending out across the rest of an essentially static planetary society — are completely in line with the capabilities of that society. Nobody on Safehold, including Merlin, truly realized the extent to which the entire planet was a compressed spring, waiting to launch a furious spate of innovations and technological advances which had been dammed up by the Church for the better part of 800 years, given that Safehold started with a far more sophisticated toolbox than Old Earth enjoyed anytime prior to the end of the 19th century. That's what readers need to understand if they want to put the Safeholdian rate of progress into context with the historical rate of progress here on Earth in real life.


I think that's a really fascinating & key insight - it's surely going to underpin what we will see in the next book or so
Top
Re: The Navy of God against Charis naval superiority
Post by Henry Brown   » Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:54 pm

Henry Brown
Commodore

Posts: 912
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:57 pm
Location: Greenville NC

n7axw wrote:I,for one, will admit that, with the possible exception of Charis, I had Safehold comparable more to 17th century Europe before the age of industrialization than to the 19th century.

I suspect what is happening here is that when we think of the Writ, we tend to think only in terms of the proscriptions rather than the guidance it provides in such areas as chemistry and agriculture. Much of what Safehold takes for granted, we on Earth had to figure out a step at a time.

Don


Like you, I mentally had the mainland around late 17th century real world in industry pre-Merlin. Mainly due to the repeated emphasis on what is prohibited and on how difficult it is for new innovations to be approved. I DID think of them around 19th century RW in agriculture. So I guess I was half-right. ;)
Top
Re: The Navy of God against Charis naval superiority
Post by lyonheart   » Sun Sep 28, 2014 12:37 am

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hi Henry Brown,

We had from HFaF, that Safehold had all sorts of 19th century agricultural equipment including reapers etc which require at least some steel [blades etc] to work, cast or wrought iron being too heavy and too inflexible for long term affordable farm work.

So steel was being used for major societal applications but couldn't be made in the bulk quantities of the non-war obvious demand, and while Charis was iron master to the world, iron boring tools were evidently limited compared to brass, which Charis has a lot given all the church bells Merlin noted when he arrived.

Howsmyn's tool master [re-]invented the micrometer and dozens of other standard measure tools, that are critical for universal interchangeability, not just within the same factory, that the Go4 and their artisans may still have no clue about their critical importance.

While steel production may go up in the Go4 lands thanks to the stolen open hearth designs, being largely restricted to blockaded South Harchong won't help until they are supplemented by others on Haven.

Until then the Go4 will be stuck in the iron era, even they can make very good near steel iron, a bottleneck which will hold them back until they lose the current war.

L


Henry Brown wrote:*quote="n7axw"*I,for one, will admit that, with the possible exception of Charis, I had Safehold comparable more to 17th century Europe before the age of industrialization than to the 19th century.

I suspect what is happening here is that when we think of the Writ, we tend to think only in terms of the proscriptions rather than the guidance it provides in such areas as chemistry and agriculture. Much of what Safehold takes for granted, we on Earth had to figure out a step at a time.

Don*quote*

Like you, I mentally had the mainland around late 17th century real world in industry pre-Merlin. Mainly due to the repeated emphasis on what is prohibited and on how difficult it is for new innovations to be approved. I DID think of them around 19th century RW in agriculture. So I guess I was half-right. ;)
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: The Navy of God against Charis naval superiority
Post by Alistair   » Sun Sep 28, 2014 1:43 am

Alistair
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:48 am

Still loving the DW Info dumps

I even find DW disagreements tend to bring more info that opens up my mind so in that sense thank you [i]Dilandu [/i

]
Top
Re: The Navy of God against Charis naval superiority
Post by cralkhi   » Sun Sep 28, 2014 2:57 am

cralkhi
Captain of the List

Posts: 420
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:27 am

n7axw wrote:I,for one, will admit that, with the possible exception of Charis, I had Safehold comparable more to 17th century Europe before the age of industrialization than to the 19th century.

I suspect what is happening here is that when we think of the Writ, we tend to think only in terms of the proscriptions rather than the guidance it provides in such areas as chemistry and agriculture. Much of what Safehold takes for granted, we on Earth had to figure out a step at a time.

Don



Yeah, Langhorne really messed up there IMO, both in introducing too much technology from day one and in setting up a monotheistic system with the concept of God's Creation and a divine plan - which tends to bring in, IMO, the concept of a rational understandable world. Setting up a religion with a bunch of squabbling gods, or something like a maya doctrine of illusion or a Gnostic "the material world is a trap" picture, would have served his purposes much better IMO. The rational planned world requires something like the Proscriptions...

Of course, his errors are all good from the protagonists' perspective....
Top

Return to Safehold