Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Convoy escorts - SPOILER for SNIPPET 8 of HFQ

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Convoy escorts - SPOILER for SNIPPET 8 of HFQ
Post by runsforcelery   » Sun Oct 26, 2014 2:47 pm

runsforcelery
First Space Lord

Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:39 am
Location: South Carolina

runsforcelery wrote:

As for the "vacuum" in the Far East, I'm as lot less confident than you seem to be that any other European Great Power --- even France, given what was happening elsewhere in 1904 --- would have been willing to stick its fingers into the bonfire to pull out Russia's chestnuts.


Meant to add "even without the Anglo-Japanese naval treaty." Sorry. Got interrupted to help my son Michael with a homework project!

:lol: :lol: :lol:


"Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as Piglet came back from the dead.
Top
Re: Convoy escorts - SPOILER for SNIPPET 8 of HFQ
Post by Dilandu   » Sun Oct 26, 2014 3:05 pm

Dilandu
Admiral

Posts: 2542
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Russia

Gotta admit I'd forgotten the Kruger Telegram, but IIRC, Germany was busy in its immediate aftermath trying to smooth over the consequences with Britain. Didn't Willie write an "I didn't mean it!" letter to Aunt Victoria in which he specifically apologized?


Well, yes - because Germany simply haven't got any significant navy at this point, and any conflict with Britain at this point was pointless at least (counterproductive at most). But the relations was already bad; and the Germany didn't stop to supply the Boer with weapons and ammunitions, decpite all britain anger. ;)

I suspect anti-German hystreria would have settled down quickly in the face of a serious Mediterranean threat from a traditional enemy like France.


Yes, but what about anti-Britania hysteria in the head of Wilhelm II? ;)

Your point about the heavy mountings for the British ship occurred to me after right after I hit the "submit" key for the previous post, but I'm still willing to bet that in a genuine emergency they could have found the guns they needed, even if that meant releasing tubes from reserve and/or diverting them from ships under construction in British yards for other navies. I might well be wrong about, though, so let's move that to the "maybe" pile.


Hm. They possibly would be able to disarm their old warships ("Admirals", as the most outdated) and have some 343-mm mountings... but with their cataleptic rate of fire, they would need really many of them to take out modern french battleships. More realistic, that they tried to go with lesser artillery and produced the 254-mm guns for "Canopus"-class; it would cost them in penetration power but they would probably be able to catch up with french rate-of-fire.

The problem was, that despite all, the RN wouldn't be able to commence any new battleships before 1899. And i'm afraid thah the "Dreadnought" would be a really bad example; her impressive construction rate was possible only because all the avaliable component production was concentrated on her.

So, the Royal Navy would probably be able to have three first "Canopus"-class in 1899, ahead of shedule. But - only at the cost of stopping the work on other three, to save the components. And the french navy would possibly be able to complete the "Saint Louis" and "Gaulois" in 1899, so (assuming the Tsusima-style complete destruction of the modern ships of mediterranian fleet and no losses between), the Royal Navy would have ten modern battleships against the french eight. Still nothing near overwhelming superiority.

I agree, that in long-time period the industrial capabilites of the Britain would do better, and after 1899, they would be able to comission much more battleships than France. But it wouldn't help them retake Mediterranian in 1899, and if the RN would be defeated once more - the situation would became next thing to hopeless for Britain. Moreover, the grand defeat of the Royal Navy - even one - may lead to the large number of nations (like Russia, Germany and Italy) started to doubt "And why do we have to reckon with the British?"

So... It is a interesting thing to think about, the Franco-Britain war in 1898! ;)

Meant to add "even without the Anglo-Japanese naval treaty." Sorry. Got interrupted to help my son Michael with a homework project!


It's okay, I did understand that.
------------------------------

Oh well, if shortening the front is what the Germans crave,
Let's shorten it to very end - the length of Fuhrer's grave.

(Red Army lyrics from 1945)
Top
Re: Convoy escorts - SPOILER for SNIPPET 8 of HFQ
Post by Dilandu   » Sun Oct 26, 2014 4:39 pm

Dilandu
Admiral

Posts: 2542
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Russia

Hm, i actually forgot about the second-rate battleships on the Pacific... so, the RN would have something like 13 to 8. But with Mediterranian under French control, and without Panama Channel it took a good part of a year to circumnavigate back to Atlantic, and it may not worth the risk - to leave the Indian Ocean unprotected (and if something happened to Idnia - like french-inspired full-scale rebellion - the United Kingdom would be in Really Bad Position)
------------------------------

Oh well, if shortening the front is what the Germans crave,
Let's shorten it to very end - the length of Fuhrer's grave.

(Red Army lyrics from 1945)
Top
Re: Convoy escorts - SPOILER for SNIPPET 8 of HFQ
Post by runsforcelery   » Sun Oct 26, 2014 5:54 pm

runsforcelery
First Space Lord

Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:39 am
Location: South Carolina

Dilandu wrote:Hm, i actually forgot about the second-rate battleships on the Pacific... so, the RN would have something like 13 to 8. But with Mediterranian under French control, and without Panama Channel it took a good part of a year to circumnavigate back to Atlantic, and it may not worth the risk - to leave the Indian Ocean unprotected (and if something happened to Idnia - like french-inspired full-scale rebellion - the United Kingdom would be in Really Bad Position)


None too sure of that estimate, Dilandu. :geek:

Unlike the Baltic Fleet, the Brits had an entire chain of coaling stations and they were accustomed to trans-oceanic deployments. Moreover, USS Oregon steamed from San Francisco to Florida, around the tip of S. America (distance 16,000 miles) in just 36 days for the Spanish-American War in (by the strangest coincidence) none other than the year of 1898. Near as I can calculate it, from Hong Kong to Portsmouth around the Cape of Good Hope is only about 13,500 nautical miles (15,470 statute miles), or roughly 96% of the same distance, and I'm pretty sure the Royal Navy would have been able to steam as expeditiously as the (then) much less experienced USN. (In addition, Oregon was designed as a short-legged, low-endruance coast-defense battleship, so the British battleships were probably longer-legged and considerably better seaboats than she was. HMS Centurion, I know, was designed for 6,000 miles, whereas Oregon's designed cruising radius was only about 4,000.) So it would be more like 34 days than "a good part of a year." That would mean the RN could call in its reserves from overseas a lot more quickly than you're assuming . . . and the French would know it. That might, ah . . . mitigate their enthusiasm for water sports in the Med. ;) :lol: For that matter, assuming the French preparations took a couple of weeks and the RN got wind of them, the battleships could be close to half way home before the French could launch an attack. In fact, assuming the attack was preceded by a period of worsening tensions (which I think would almost have to be the case for something this drastic to actually happen), they might well already be in European waters (even without using the Suez Canal en route) by the time the balloon went up.

That sort of ability to redeploy rapidly is one of the things I was getting at when I pointed out the huge advantages the RN's unsurpassed worldwide deployment stance gave it. It's sort of like the difference between the US and the rest of NATO today. The US military has the logistic reach to support not only itself but its allies at immense distances; at this moment in time, no one else in the world does. The Brits in the 1880s-1890s had that same unique level of ability to deploy naval assets

As for bad things happening in the overseas battleships' absence, I doubt it would have been much of a problem. Bringing in the battleships wouldn't necessarily require the Brits to withdraw any of their cruisers and/or lighter units from those distant stations, so I doubt it would leave them any more exposed to a "French-inspired, full-scale rebellion" in India or anywhere else than they'd have been if the battleships had been left on the distant stations. Things might get a little interesting in places like the China Sea, but unless the French were prepared to significantly reinforce their own fleet in the Far East (which would mean reductions in the force available for this Exciting Mediterranean Adventure of yours 8-)), I doubt the Empire would be especially exposed to danger by recalling the second-class battleships. On the other hand, those same second-class battleships would be pretty capable of holding their own against their French counterparts, I think. ;)


"Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as Piglet came back from the dead.
Top
Re: Convoy escorts - SPOILER for SNIPPET 8 of HFQ
Post by Henry Brown   » Sun Oct 26, 2014 6:22 pm

Henry Brown
Commodore

Posts: 912
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:57 pm
Location: Greenville NC

Steelpoodle wrote:Additionally, "Six Frigate" by Ian Toll is as good start on the US frigates as well.


I read this book last year. As a matter of fact, the reason I read it was due to a recommendation some other forum member made in a previous thread. It is an excellent, informative read.
Top
Re: Convoy escorts - SPOILER for SNIPPET 8 of HFQ
Post by Castenea   » Sun Oct 26, 2014 7:22 pm

Castenea
Captain of the List

Posts: 671
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:21 pm
Location: MD

runsforcelery wrote:
That sort of ability to redeploy rapidly is one of the things I was getting at when I pointed out the huge advantages the RN's unsurpassed worldwide deployment stance gave it. It's sort of like the difference between the US and the rest of NATO today. The US military has the logistic reach to support not only itself but its allies at immense distances; at this moment in time, no one else in the world does. The Brits in the 1880s-1890s had that same unique level of ability to deploy naval assets

As for bad things happening in the overseas battleships' absence, I doubt it would have been much of a problem. Bringing in the battleships wouldn't necessarily require the Brits to withdraw any of their cruisers and/or lighter units from those distant stations, so I doubt it would leave them any more exposed to a "French-inspired, full-scale rebellion" in India or anywhere else than they'd have been if the battleships had been left on the distant stations. Things might get a little interesting in places like the China Sea, but unless the French were prepared to significantly reinforce their own fleet in the Far East (which would mean reductions in the force available for this Exciting Mediterranean Adventure of yours 8-)), I doubt the Empire would be especially exposed to danger by recalling the second-class battleships. On the other hand, those same second-class battleships would be pretty capable of holding their own against their French counterparts, I think. ;)

I believe the UK was working on improving relations with the US to prevent this kind of gambit in the Carribean at that time. US attacking Jamaica and BVI instead of Puerto Rico and Cuba? I get the possibly false impression that only in the UK was there any significant faction that understood that the US was well on the way to becoming a great power before 1914.

Much like the war of 1812, conflict with the US would have been at best a major distraction for the RN during any conflict with France. They had the diplomats work on preventing this from at least 1900 if not earlier. Who knows there might even have been an equivalent of the "Zimmerman Telegram".
Top
Re: Convoy escorts - SPOILER for SNIPPET 8 of HFQ
Post by runsforcelery   » Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:48 pm

runsforcelery
First Space Lord

Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:39 am
Location: South Carolina

runsforcelery wrote:
Dilandu wrote:Hm, i actually forgot about the second-rate battleships on the Pacific... so, the RN would have something like 13 to 8. But with Mediterranian under French control, and without Panama Channel it took a good part of a year to circumnavigate back to Atlantic, and it may not worth the risk - to leave the Indian Ocean unprotected (and if something happened to Idnia - like french-inspired full-scale rebellion - the United Kingdom would be in Really Bad Position)


None too sure of that estimate, Dilandu. :geek:

Unlike the Baltic Fleet, the Brits had an entire chain of coaling stations and they were accustomed to trans-oceanic deployments. Moreover, USS Oregon steamed from San Francisco to Florida, around the tip of S. America (distance 16,000 miles) in just 36 days for the Spanish-American War in (by the strangest coincidence) none other than the year of 1898. Near as I can calculate it, from Hong Kong to Portsmouth around the Cape of Good Hope is only about 13,500 nautical miles (15,470 statute miles), or roughly 96% of the same distance, and I'm pretty sure the Royal Navy would have been able to steam as expeditiously as the (then) much less experienced USN. (In addition, Oregon was designed as a short-legged, low-endruance coast-defense battleship, so the British battleships were probably longer-legged and considerably better seaboats than she was. HMS Centurion, I know, was designed for 6,000 miles, whereas Oregon's designed cruising radius was only about 4,000.) So it would be more like 34 days than "a good part of a year." That would mean the RN could call in its reserves from overseas a lot more quickly than you're assuming . . . and the French would know it. That might, ah . . . mitigate their enthusiasm for water sports in the Med. ;) :lol: For that matter, assuming the French preparations took a couple of weeks and the RN got wind of them, the battleships could be close to half way home before the French could launch an attack. In fact, assuming the attack was preceded by a period of worsening tensions (which I think would almost have to be the case for something this drastic to actually happen), they might well already be in European waters (even without using the Suez Canal en route) by the time the balloon went up.

That sort of ability to redeploy rapidly is one of the things I was getting at when I pointed out the huge advantages the RN's unsurpassed worldwide deployment stance gave it. It's sort of like the difference between the US and the rest of NATO today. The US military has the logistic reach to support not only itself but its allies at immense distances; at this moment in time, no one else in the world does. The Brits in the 1880s-1890s had that same unique level of ability to deploy naval assets

As for bad things happening in the overseas battleships' absence, I doubt it would have been much of a problem. Bringing in the battleships wouldn't necessarily require the Brits to withdraw any of their cruisers and/or lighter units from those distant stations, so I doubt it would leave them any more exposed to a "French-inspired, full-scale rebellion" in India or anywhere else than they'd have been if the battleships had been left on the distant stations. Things might get a little interesting in places like the China Sea, but unless the French were prepared to significantly reinforce their own fleet in the Far East (which would mean reductions in the force available for this Exciting Mediterranean Adventure of yours 8-)), I doubt the Empire would be especially exposed to danger by recalling the second-class battleships. On the other hand, those same second-class battleships would be pretty capable of holding their own against their French counterparts, I think. ;)


Hah! So, Dilandu, you're finally in bed and I get the last word! :o :D :twisted:

Temporarily, at least . . . . :roll:


"Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as Piglet came back from the dead.
Top
Re: Convoy escorts - SPOILER for SNIPPET 8 of HFQ
Post by Caliban   » Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:51 pm

Caliban
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 1:23 pm
Location: Wisconsin,USA

Hey, this was a very cool debate, IMO... learned a bit, and as a spectator, it was a lot like, well, watching a pair of Battlewagons lob shells at each other. :lol:
====================================


"A wise man speaks because he has something to say; A Fool speaks because he has to say something."
Top
Re: Convoy escorts - SPOILER for SNIPPET 8 of HFQ
Post by n7axw   » Mon Oct 27, 2014 1:13 am

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Caliban wrote:Hey, this was a very cool debate, IMO... learned a bit, and as a spectator, it was a lot like, well, watching a pair of Battlewagons lob shells at each other. :lol:


Battlewagons? Actually I thought the debate became more civil as it went along.

I also enjoyed it. It's nice to have good clean argumentation without rancour.

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Convoy escorts - SPOILER for SNIPPET 8 of HFQ
Post by Dilandu   » Mon Oct 27, 2014 2:15 am

Dilandu
Admiral

Posts: 2542
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Russia

runsforcelery wrote:[

Hah! So, Dilandu, you're finally in bed and I get the last word! :o :D :twisted:

Temporarily, at least . . . . :roll:


Heh, i'm returned with fresh salvo! :D :D :D Mua-ha-ha!

On the other hand, those same second-class battleships would be pretty capable of holding their own against their French counterparts, I think.


Well, if we count them, i see no reason to not count the last-generation french coastal defense ships - two of "Bouvines"-class. Of course, they have somewhat limited ability in open sea (but actually they would probably be as good as BB-5 "Iowa" with the same raised forecastle), but their two long-barreled 305-mm guns with heavier shell and more than a third better muzzle velocity would be at leas as effective as four shorter-barreled 254-mm guns on "Centurions".

And with them, we would have 13 RN battleships agains 10 french. Still nothing near the superiority.

Things might get a little interesting in places like the China Sea, but unless the French were prepared to significantly reinforce their own fleet in the Far East


Actually, the french navy have a fair number of armoured and protected cruisers, plus old stationary battleships of "Vauban"-class and "Bayard"-class in East Asia and Carribean. Som they could give a lot of problems \to the RN, if the battleships would be recalled.

And there was also the possibility of obsolete french battleships (many of they were re-armed with the modern long-barreled guns)would go through the Suez in Indian Ocean. Without second-rate battleships, the Royal Navy would be unable to stop them effectively; so, there is a possibility of losing not only the Mediterranian Routes, but also a large part of Indian Ocean routes.
Last edited by Dilandu on Mon Oct 27, 2014 2:43 am, edited 2 times in total.
------------------------------

Oh well, if shortening the front is what the Germans crave,
Let's shorten it to very end - the length of Fuhrer's grave.

(Red Army lyrics from 1945)
Top

Return to Safehold