Keith_w wrote:PeterZ wrote:Thanatos,
While I agree with you, I do believe that pushing for representative governments is the logical progression for the CoC's stance on individual moral responsibility. If God demands the individual be responsible for his moral choices and not simply following Church hierarchy dictates, then would He not also expect the individual to be responsible for choosing his secular governance? Is not government the aggregate embodiment of following God's will? How can that be true unless the individual has some authority to choose their own governance? I believe that argument is the natural extension of everything Charis has done to date.
While this sounds very good, at this point in time it would probably lead to a church lead government in each of the territories involved. The people would see it as "God demands it". And it would be pushed from pulpits across the land. At least in non-Charissian associated states.
Besides, who says that a group of people are any wiser than an individual?
The point isn't that groups are wiser than individuals, but that if ultimate moral responsibility resides in the individual so does secular responsibility. Asserting one, asserts the other. How that responsibility is expressed in governance remains fluid.