![](http://davidweber.net/img/menu-start.gif)
![](http://davidweber.net/img/menu-end.gif)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Re: Forum Rules & Information | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Duckk
Posts: 4200
|
Beats me, probably a quirk with PHPbb.
-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope |
Top |
Re: Forum Rules & Information | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
TangoLima
Posts: 286
|
I was recently told that when I replied to a post more
than a year old, that I should start a new thread. This made me realize I was ignorant of unwritten forum rules. How old must a post be before requiring the start of a new thread ? Are there other unwritten rules I am unaware of ? Assume nearly complete ignorance. |
Top |
Re: Forum Rules & Information | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Duckk
Posts: 4200
|
Generally, I wouldn't worry about bumping up old posts, so long as they don't conflict with the unmarked spoilers rule.
-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope |
Top |
Re: Forum Rules & Information | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Theemile
Posts: 5094
|
We call it "Necroing". Usually if a conversation is dead for multiple weeks, it is a good idea just to start a new conversation, with all the concepts you trying to convey framed in the message. That way the readers don't have to re-read several pages of posts trying to understand what you are responding to. Other wise it feels like someone blurting out the answer to a question in a conversation 20 minutes after the question was asked. ******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships." |
Top |
Re: Forum Rules & Information | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Tenshinai
Posts: 2893
|
And as the forum administrator just noted, it is NOT against the rules here. There's an absurdly stupid obsession among some people that it IS or MUST BE forbidded everywhere. Not to mention how many excuses exists to rant about how terrible it is. Stupidly annoying. Unless explicit forum rules says otherwise: If a new thread is a better idea, sure, but if it's not, then you reply to the old thread, because otherwise you end up like on the spacebattles forum, ten fricking million threads about the same subject that are bloody impossible to find anything in. |
Top |
Re: Forum Rules & Information | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Jacob Zavala
Posts: 14
|
Hello! I just joined today and was unsure of the protocol for introducing myself. Some forums have a dedicated "New member introduction" forum, subforum, or thread, but I haven't found one. Nor did I see any other introductions when I scanned the forums earlier. This thread, then, seemed the logical place to either inquire about the established methods, or, failing that, just introduce myself. So hi! I'm me.
|
Top |
Re: Forum Rules & Information | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
ldwechsler
Posts: 1235
|
Are you sure of that? Anyhow, welcome. Enjoy! And suffer while waiting for the next Honor book. |
Top |
Re: Forum Rules & Information | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
Duckk, and other intelligences of the forum, is there an easier way to find a buried thread's true address/link other than painstaking search of each page?
For instance, I was in need of finding the Artificial Intelligence thread whose true address/link is represented by the following: {http://forums.davidweber.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=5679} which properly yields... Artificial Intelligence. However, that topic is somewhat deeply buried on page 33 of the site. Of course, searching for the topic by entering the keywords of "artificial intelligence" yields the topic. However, when "jumping" to the post this address is given: {http://forums.davidweber.net/viewtopic.phpf=1&t=5679&hilit=artificial+intelligence} but, although this will link to the topic, it is not a true address when wanting to cue posts with [start="x"] and there is no way to obtain the actual page (page 33 in this case) of the topic even after finding the topic by search and seizure. Am I missing a trick or something Duckk and members of the forums? Late Edit: Umm, never mind. My niece just texted me a workaround. Simply strip the extraneous. Doh! S'times the obvious is sitting right on your nose. And the fact that I never noticed the extraneous. ![]() Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: Forum Rules & Information | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Randomiser
Posts: 1451
|
Duck any chance of doing something with the Snippets forum to make it more readable? There are all these STICKY threads for older books to scroll down through before getting to the one for Call to Vengeance which is the only active one, and it's not even Sticky. How about reversing these sticky statuses so the one of interest pops to the top? Any other way you can make that happen would be fine too.
|
Top |
Re: Forum Rules & Information | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Duckk
Posts: 4200
|
Alright, I'll drop a few.
-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope |
Top |