Hi CrewDude48,
Exactly!
Kudos to you and HVB and all the rest for expressing the subtext problem with the comic and the animation.
I totally agree Nimitz has to be first seen as cuddly and cute, his deadliness is innate but like Victor, Leviathan lurks below, unseen until roused.
The anatomical critique regarding the fore pair being so far forward is right on, the T-Rex arm comparison seems quite valid.
For me it might be someone falsely admiring Nimitz looking all cuddly, and when their back is turned he unsheathes all his claws in distaste, and HH tut-tuts him and he relaxes and snuggles up to her; or where the person can't see, he flexes one set of his claws while HH tut-tuts them done.
So he's obviously cute, because EVERYONE REACTS TO TREECATS THAT WAY, but he/they can be fierce is the subtext.
I would think that the cuteness would have been a prime consideration from the get-go, with the lethal transformation [he's still fluffy cute] that has everyone going OH WOW!
Then the audience is going to be eagerly watching to see it happen again.
L
crewdude48 wrote:I fully agree that cute and cuddly with the ability to rip your face off is the way to go. Imagine the impact the dinning room scene would have if most people did not suspect that he could do that. Have a scene earlier in the movie where he gets startled and pops out his claws to get across the fact that he is not a teddy bear, but make him the instantly loveable that he is in the books. I do not feel that there is any good reason to make him frightening. Any Armsman who let that Nimitz into the Protector's house should be shot.
As for the anatomy, I think it looks...off. It looks like a regular 4 legged climbing mammal with a pair of T-rex arms stuck on its chest.