PeterZ wrote:gcomeau wrote:THEN WHY WERE THEY AFRAID TO HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED?
Answer the damn question. If all they were going to find was "oh this isn't credible" and CLEAR the guy they were giving a supreme Court seat to? Why block the investigation of the claims if, as you assert here, that investigation would clear their nominee?
Because you would be giving credence to the character assassination implicit in those non credible accusations.
gcomeau wrote:
The investigation finding the accusation NOT credible would make them credible?
Ummm no. Try again. Something less mind numbingly stupid this time if you don't mind.
Pperhaps if it was honestly covered you would be right. It won't be as the echo chamber of the Mainstream Media's 92% negative coverage of the administration will ignore anything that does not sopport their narrative. Heck the Senators believe Dr. Ford despite the lack of corroboration on a party-line basis. The media will as well despite any lack of corroboration because they are a wholly owned subsidiary of the Proggy Resistance. After all, the lack of specifics make it IMPOSSIBLE to disprove her charges. That means he won't be criminally convicted, but every MSM POS will believe her and broadcast that belief to the detriment of Justice Kavanaugh's reputation. They will ignore everything that is not credible and focus on those items that cannot be disproven because the accuser doesn't recall enough specifics to provide Justice Kavanaugh a chance to disprove them.
Yeah, the investigation will make it clear that the accusations aren't credible. Bullshit! Did the investigation of of Michael Brown's shooting persuade anyone that he was attacking the policeman that shot him? No, because the MSM did not cover anything that redirected their audience from their narrative. Hands up don't shoot never happened, but tell that to most proggies. So, pardon me that I support protecting an innocent man and his family from more of your side's character assasination attempts. I take that back, don't pardom me.