smr wrote:When someone is working with the President of the United States of America, they are subject to most extensive background that the Federal government can do. Remind me again what was Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh previous job in the Bush Administration. Most people are not aware of extensive background checks people must endure when working in sensitive positions within the government and Kavanaugh endured them 7 times.
How many times does it have to be explained to you that if such background checks are not conducted with specific focus on finding a specific unreported crime there is effective NO chance they will uncover such an event as they are not criminal investigations?
Those 7 background investigation? Kavanaugh's college roommate reported he was never contacted once. Anybody looking into what he was up to in school would have started with the guy who lived with him the entire damn time. But they WEREN'T digging deep into what he was up to in school because nobody gave them a reason to.
Pay. Attention.
In the beginning, I questioned Ford's testimony but felt like something happened to her. Later, discussing this with my wife, she convinced me that Mrs. Ford was lying.
And here comes smr's signature move... "one of my family members agrees with me".
Their is no evidence of the alleged event.
One more time.... it goes:
Accusation ---> INVESTIGATION ---> Evidence.
If you skip or deliberately cripple step 2, you don't get to appeal to the resulting lack of substance in step 3 as supporting your claim nothing happened.