CRC wrote:No I didn't miss anything. The chemical warhead on the rocket is a kludge to begin with.
You just proved that YOU DID MISS SOMETHING.
It wasn´t a chemical warhead. It was an IMPROVISED DEVICE using what MAY have started as the pipe of a regular 122mm HE artillery rocket.
There was no impact fuze because it was not a warhead.
CRC wrote:The "X" thing you are talking about is taking the analysis as fact in which a secondary explosive "pipe bomb" was used to "implode" the chemical warhead.
I´m well versed enough in effects of explosives to say that if the pictures are real, then that suggested way of detonation is VERY likely.
Seriously, check the pictures out.
It´s extremely obvious that the explosion was ON TOP of the pipe, and the deformation blatantly shows that the explosion was centered on the middle of the pipe, while the crater shows clear evidence of an equal effect elongated explosive transversal to the pipe.
CRC wrote:I am stepping back and looking at the whole thing from all aspects. This includes the 2013 incident and the reports leaked on data from National Technical Means (NTM). Especially satellite data in 2013 and radar data from 2017.
Uh, you do know that pretty much anything from 2013 that came from USA has been more or less discredited? On the level of evidence as that Powell tried to sell to UN as proof of Saddams WMDs, the evidence that myself and thousands others figured out were fake within minutes of their release because they were such blatantly obvious and crappy fakes...
CRC wrote:The power this presumes makes everything else moot. It's over. We're all slaves and dupes. Might as well surrender now. There is no future, there is only servicing the state...
Black helicopters, CFR, EUCFR, Area 51...
That's pretty depressing...
Hardly. Look at the looong history of US false flag shit, take the time to actually investigate a little.
Then be very astounded at just how amazingly incompetent these people have to be to so repeatedly fail in hiding that it IS fake.
Either they´re incredibly incompetent, or shortsighted enough to need glasses to see their own noses.
CRC wrote:If you follow the money, the first stop is Russia. They would have to supply the new planes for Syria.
Maybe that's it...Trump's intelligence people are manipulating the intelligence so that Trump will destroy the Syrian Air Force so that Master Tranyr Putin will make money selling new jets to Assad...
Inventive. But that´s not actually following the money, because if stuff like this keeps happening, Syria isn´t going to have any cash to buy things with.
And, if the US-supported rebels ever get past fighting each other, Assad isn´t going to be around anyway. Which means Russia loses one of their handful of bases outside of ex-USSR.
Which of course goes just perfectly along with the US doctrine of keeping anything from threatening its global domination, of which Russia is considered one of the biggest dangers. And as ex US national security advisor(Brzezinski) wrote, Russia must be surrounded by a zone of "percolating violence" to keep it from actually being able to do anything but focus on domestic troubles and not get any ideas about acting globally.
The really sad part about this is that the above comes from a commercial book, and the asshole was even a "professor of American Foreign Policy" and lauded as someone whose ideas should be followed...
With most of those ideas effectively being to make war on another nation just because it happens to have the potential to be an obstacle for US global domination.