Guns, Guns Guns

Fly, perhaps you should check your references.

Seriously.

The one that you complain was an apparent home invasion, is listed as an aparent home invasion.

I may have missed it, but there was nothing in the list to match your second linked point.

TFLYTSNBN wrote:And of course we find that if President Obama had some bastard sons, they would look like these guys:
http://www.14news.com/2019/01/18/names- ... -shooting/
(The "if Obama had a bastard son" joke is rediculous because it implies that Obama has a functioning penis and testicles)

It's this sort of gratuitous sneering nastiness that tells me you're only posting your drivel for the joy of pissing people off.

TFLYTSNBN wrote:
And of course we find that if President Obama had some bastard sons, they would look like these guys:
http://www.14news.com/2019/01/18/names- ... -shooting/
(The "if Obama had a bastard son" joke is rediculous because it implies that Obama has a functioning penis and testicles)

You pull shit like this... and then you whine and cry when you get called a racist bigot...

gcomeau wrote:

TFLYTSNBN wrote:
And of course we find that if President Obama had some bastard sons, they would look like these guys:
http://www.14news.com/2019/01/18/names- ... -shooting/
(The "if Obama had a bastard son" joke is rediculous because it implies that Obama has a functioning penis and testicles)

You pull shit like this... and then you whine and cry when you get called a racist bigot...

It is a very legitimate parody of President Obama's racist exploitation of the Trayvon Martin shooting to incite racial discord. IIRC, the exact quote was "if I had a son,he would look like Trayvon Martin." This comment was made without any acknowledgement of Martin's criminal record, history of violent assaults, drug abuse, drug trafficking, intoxicated condition and the nearly lethal physical assault against George Zimmerman. The punch line is that Zimmerman's grandfather was black.

dscott8 wrote:

TFLYTSNBN wrote:And of course we find that if President Obama had some bastard sons, they would look like these guys:
http://www.14news.com/2019/01/18/names- ... -shooting/
(The "if Obama had a bastard son" joke is rediculous because it implies that Obama has a functioning penis and testicles)

It's this sort of gratuitous sneering nastiness that tells me you're only posting your drivel for the joy of pissing people off.

See my reply above.

TFLYTSNBN wrote:See my reply above.

Nah, you're not good enough at rhetoric to make a legitimate claim to honesty here.

No, what you're doing here is neatly encapsulated in Jean Paul Sartre's essay "Anti-Semite and Jew":

“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors.”

Except, I'm not entirely sure you actually are aware of the absurdity and impropriety of your statements....

The E wrote:

TFLYTSNBN wrote:See my reply above.

Nah, you're not good enough at rhetoric to make a legitimate claim to honesty here.

No, what you're doing here is neatly encapsulated in Jean Paul Sartre's essay "Anti-Semite and Jew":

“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors.”

Except, I'm not entirely sure you actually are aware of the absurdity and impropriety of your statements....

How is an accusation of antisemitism relevant?

You might want to peruse the FBI publication LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS KILLED AND ASSULTED: 2016 to review all of the premeditated ambush murders that were perpetrated by African Americans who had been incited to violence by President Obama's racialist rhetoric. These racist attacks continued until one police chief (who was African American) disinvited President Obama so that you could not exploit the venue to incite more attacks.

https://ucr.fbi.gov/leoka/2016/officers ... aries-2016

TFLYTSNBN wrote:You might want to peruse the FBI publication LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS KILLED AND ASSULTED: 2016 to review all of the premeditated ambush murders that were perpetrated by African Americans who had been incited to violence by President Obama's racialist rhetoric. These racist attacks continued until one police chief (who was African American) disinvited President Obama so that you could not exploit the venue to incite more attacks.

...and for those of us who don't treat grammar like a game of "Pin The Tail On The Donkey"... this means?
For starters, you haven't included a link to the publication in question (which is odd given your tendency to put random links in) and you are missing the A from Assaulted. In addition, given the quote in your own post, you seem to be accusing The E of exploiting the venue to incite more attacks... in which case, you really need to either back that up by pulling up his posts that prove your point or CHECK THE TENSES IN YOUR POST FIRST!

Also, please remember to use the Return button occasionally to make your posts easier to read and less likely to be misunderstood. Walls of text a convincing argument do not make.

Michael Everett wrote:

TFLYTSNBN wrote:You might want to peruse the FBI publication LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS KILLED AND ASSULTED: 2016 to review all of the premeditated ambush murders that were perpetrated by African Americans who had been incited to violence by President Obama's racialist rhetoric. These racist attacks continued until one police chief (who was African American) disinvited President Obama so that you could not exploit the venue to incite more attacks.

...and for those of us who don't treat grammar like a game of "Pin The Tail On The Donkey"... this means?
For starters, you haven't included a link to the publication in question (which is odd given your tendency to put random links in) and you are missing the A from Assaulted. In addition, given the quote in your own post, you seem to be accusing The E of exploiting the venue to incite more attacks... in which case, you really need to either back that up by pulling up his posts that prove your point or CHECK THE TENSES IN YOUR POST FIRST!

Also, please remember to use the Return button occasionally to make your posts easier to read and less likely to be misunderstood. Walls of text a convincing argument do not make.

You need to learn how to read. The link is right at the bottom of the post.

Yes, I am sloppy.

TFLYTSNBN wrote:You need to learn how to read. The link is right at the bottom of the post.

I see. Added after I pointed out the lack of the link, no less.
Nice try, Tfly. Nice try...