TFLYTSNBN wrote:I'm not wanting to double post, but I didn't want my comments to be confused with Zeihan's.
I think that Zeihan accurately describes China's economic and political predicament. Keep in mind that immediately prior to the plague, China was plagued by a near rebellion in Hong Kong. China's regime is fragile.
I disagree that China is so militarily disadvantaged. The Intermediate Nuclear Forces treaty enabled China to develop forces that were forbidden to the US and Russia. Antiship ballistic missiles that severely out range the F-35 and the F-18 make it extremely hazardous for carriers to engage China. The US has a few tricks up it's sleeve, but a war with China would not be easy. The risk of nuclear escalation is serious.
What I am hoping will happen is that Trump will exploit the global outrage about China's duplicity without pressing them so hard that they go on the warpath. A gradual repatriation of critical manufacturing to America in combination with a global trade meltdown will cripple China's economy without pushing them ovdr the edge. After a decade of economic implosion and political upheaval, China will no longer be a peer threat.
At a guess, that is what this business in the South China Sea is all about... China is trying to gain control over energy resources close to home...
Don
-