Michael Everett wrote:2) China is not known for its innovation skills. Duplication, yes. Modification, to a degree, but innovation? Their entire current culture is constructed to stifle free-thinking. Orders must be followed, forms filled in... original thinking (or even going off-script) are seen as threats to be quashed.
Creating a Bio-weapon and deploying it requires both innovation and a rather fanatical attention to detail that most Chinese simply do not have due to their upbringing and education.
Yes, there are Chinese people more than capable of doing said things, but given the cultural inertia they'd have to work against, it is unlikely in the extreme that they could assemble the resources needed for such a project.
This is an old trope about China, but ask yourself this: Can a country like China, which has undergone very rapid change in its technical and manufacturing capabilities and is undergoing rapid social changes really be called "incapable of innovation"?
See, the thing is, the PRC knows that it lagged behind western countries (and, for that matter, several asian ones) in terms of its ability to innovate. And then they took measures to address that shortcoming: as of 2016, the PRC was spending 2.1% of its GDP on R&D -- which doesn't sound like much, until you consider that the US spent 2.79& of its GDP on research that year. Chinese companies and inventors are registering patents at a blistering speed, chinese researchers are publishing papers; Companies like Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent are making serious waves in the west.
Secondly, on a cultural level, China is at a level of infatuation with technology and the new that was last seen around the west in the 50s and 60s: they are optimistic about new things in ways that we aren't anymore.
It is absolutely correct to say that there are structural factors that are holding back chinese innovators from innovating. But do not expect that to remain true for long.