The E wrote:"those jihadists"? Who? Tell me, as an approximate number, how many of the approximately 5 million muslims currently in Germany are "jihadists"?
How many do you need? It only took a dozen of them to provoke a massive overreaction from the US government — the ‘Patriot Act’, Department Of Homeland Security, and TSA. The government took our freedom, and we got nothing for it. How many atrocities would it take to provoke crackdowns from the German government? Like the ones we’re already seeing in France?
Taking down Al-Queda
was necessary, by the way. We can’t stop them from hating us, and trying to kill us, so we are left with killing them in self-defense.
The E wrote:Oh right, it's because we're a democracy and the only way to get changes done is through democratic actions, which is kind of hard to do if you're some sort of fringe group (as islamic extremists inevitably are).
So was the Weimar Republic. How the hell can a German be utterly oblivious to the abuses that governments are prone to,
AND the dangers of fanatics? Do you know nothing of history at all, especially your own?
The E wrote:And yet you keep protesting about it. The normal reaction to finding something mildly amusing is to either commend it or move past it...
Wow, the mockery just flies right over your head…
The E wrote:Don't blame me for the stupidity of your electoral system that makes every presidential election into a two-horse race; The fact that you didn't perform the one action that would stop a Trump presidency from happening indicates that you were fine with Trump as a president because you assumed that the alternative was worse.
What has any of that to do with your false claims that I am ‘A Trump Voter’ and/or ‘A Trump Fanboy’? Other than it being a typical leftist move. When called on your bullshit, you try to distract everybody by flinging more bullshit.
The E wrote:I am right in treating you and TFLY as roughly similar in outlook
WHY is it such an intolerable hardship and injustice for people to live in their own home countries? Why are we so Unspeakably Eeevil for wanting them to do so? How else are we to deal with the mobs besieging our borders?
The E wrote:QED
Wait, isn't that what you're supposed to put after a well-reasoned, conclusive argument? Not just stuck on…nothing?
The E wrote:Well, aren't you the guys currently at the forefront of climate change denial?
Before you can accuse anyone of 'denial' you must first establish that there is something to deny.
Nobody can stop you from following Chicken Little, but some of us have noticed that the sky is not, in fact, falling, and that running to the King in a panic is the wrong solution to the wrong problem. There are other, much better reasons to escape our dependence on the burning of coal, oil and gas for energy. Political reasons, such as handing trillions of dollars to those proclaiming themselves our enemies. Safety reasons, stemming from the hazards of transporting millions of tons of toxic, flammable and potentially explosive materials around the world. Practical reasons, such as the fact that they are finite resources, and will not last forever. They are becoming more expensive, not only in terms of money, but in the amount of energy required to extract and process them for use. The net energy yield is diminishing.
Those reasons are not based on an unproven hypothesis that depends on incomplete data, questionable methodology, and computer models that have consistently failed to make accurate predictions. They are perfectly straightforward, simple to understand, and provably true.
Thing is, those reasons also do not require massive government intrusion into our lives, do not create vast new unproductive bureaucracies stuffed with overpaid government drones, do not punish all those Eeeevil users of coal, oil and gas with gargantuan fees and bury them under burdensome regulations, and do not create opportunities to gift The Right People with trillions of dollars in ‘Green Energy’ subsidies, grants and never-to-be-paid-back ‘investments’.
So all we hear is a strident clamor from the least relevant sources — clueless celebrities and pandering politicians unqualified even to have an opinion on the subject, all screaming
GLOBALWARMING!! GLOBALWARMING!! CRISIS!! CATASTROPHE!! The King must Do Something!!
Well, the last King Did Something, and it was all a useless waste of our money that did nothing but make his rich cronies richer. See Solyndra, First Solar, Fisker, Brightsource, SunPower, and dozens of other ‘sustainable energy’ government boondoggles.
If ’97% of climate scientists’ really are all saying exactly the same thing, it’s a big clue that something is rotten. The most essential part of science is constantly questioning what we think we know. When scientists dare not question the dogma, they have ceased to do science.
It wasn’t always that way. Many years ago, some scientists
did question the growing Cult Of Climate Change, and were promptly pilloried and excommunicated for their heresy.
Scientists are smart. There only needed to be a few examples made; the rest quickly learned that if you want funding, if you want to be published, you
WILL parrot Orthodox Global Warming to the letter.
Why are the Global Warming Zealots so terrified of disagreement? Why do they act so precipitously to instantly quash all dissent? Those are not the actions of a benevolent group confident that they are right, but more the behavior one would expect from a con man afraid that the marks are wising up.
———————————
There is no shortage of people convinced they can create the perfect world. Trouble is, they always start out by fucking up this one.