BrightSoul wrote:I seem to recall that this country has attempted the isolationist line SMR is such a fan of. What did it come to? Oh, yeah, Pearl Harbor, that's what.
Its been done before and failed before what gives you the idea that it'll work any better this time?
I will agree that the US does seem to carry the bulk of the burden of NATO's commitments but that's another story than your isolationist crap. That's a fool's bargain and will cost us far more than you can imagine.
Pearl Harbor was a logical consequence of the US retaining the Philipines as a colonial possession and deploying forces to protect that possession and fight a nasty insurgency. This reality was exasperated by FDR deciding to embargo oil to Japan in retaliation for Japan invading Manchuria.