Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests
Re: Iowa caucus | |
---|---|
by Michael Everett » Fri Feb 07, 2020 2:14 am | |
Michael Everett
Posts: 2612
|
The logic is simple.
1) The Democrats organised the caucus. 2) The Democrats screwed up the vote counting. 3) Since Democrats can't count, they are obviously unable to do anything more complex, such as running the country. Trump 2020, here we come. Well done, Democrats. ~~~~~~
I can't write anywhere near as well as Weber But I try nonetheless, And even do my own artwork. (Now on Twitter)and mentioned by RFC! ACNH Dreams at DA-6594-0940-7995 |
Top |
Re: Iowa caucus | |
---|---|
by Annachie » Fri Feb 07, 2020 3:40 am | |
Annachie
Posts: 3099
|
I'd agree with you but for the tim3 the GOP changed the winner of the Iowa caucus 16 days later, thus showing nobody can run a caucus, everybody screws up the vote count, well you can fill in the rest yourself. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ still not dead. |
Top |
Re: Iowa caucus | |
---|---|
by smr » Fri Feb 07, 2020 2:25 pm | |
smr
Posts: 1522
|
This is puzzling. According to media reports their were 3 sets of information or data points. Did someone tamper with the election? Well is this interesting? George Soros is the primary shareholder of this company Shadow. QWho is this 3rd group that left no trace of themselves?
|
Top |
Re: Iowa caucus | |
---|---|
by gcomeau » Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:11 pm | |
gcomeau
Posts: 2747
|
It's only puzzling if you couldn't be bothered to spend literally 1 single minute looking up how the caucus was set up. There was supposed to be 3 sets of data reported out. 1. SDEs 2. First tally popular vote (before elimination of non viables) 3. Second tally popular vote (after elimination of non viables) Please spread the word to the pizzagate crowd. |
Top |
Re: Iowa caucus | |
---|---|
by smr » Sat Feb 08, 2020 3:45 am | |
smr
Posts: 1522
|
Funny how I ask questions that offend you. One of two things happened. One, the Demoncrats are totally incompetent. Two, someone manipulated the totals. Without being able to test the program, people will speculate.
Gcomeau, if your attempting to insult me with that Pizza Gate crap...Strike three your out. I know I forgive you Gcomeau because your having a bad week and the news just keeps bringing defeats. Trump was acquitted. Now, the Demoncrat lawsuit was thrown out of court. You know that Emoluments lawsuit that was going to bring Trump down. Better luck on the next Impeachment trial. Were you the person insulting Trump's legal team. Yeah, I remember you disparaging Miss Bondi and Alan Dershowitz...they Won! Have a great and blessed day! https://thehill.com/regulation/court-ba ... nts-claims
|
Top |
Re: Iowa caucus | |
---|---|
by gcomeau » Sat Feb 08, 2020 3:53 am | |
gcomeau
Posts: 2747
|
You claimed it was suspicious there were three data sets and invoked some kind of conspiracy to explain it. There were SUPPOSED to be three data sets. So you had no idea what you were talking about. It's that simple.
Oh ffs, they didn't "win" you clueless wonder. They could have gone up there and screeched like chimpanzees their entire time in front of the Senate and McConnell would have had everyone vote to acquit. The two things were completely unrelated. Trump could have named inanimate objects to his defense team and got the same result. That's what happens when a "trial" is so brazenly rigged all witnesses are blocked from testifying and the jurors conspire with the defense team on trial strategy. The fact that you're bragging about it is pathetic. |
Top |
Re: Iowa caucus | |
---|---|
by Daryl » Sat Feb 08, 2020 6:59 am | |
Daryl
Posts: 3521
|
smr, the entire world knew that Trump wouldn't be convicted by a dishonest partisan Senate. No surprise, no disappointment.
History will show that the Democrats played it by the book, somewhat naively, but it is on the record. |
Top |
Re: Iowa caucus | |
---|---|
by TFLYTSNBN » Sat Feb 08, 2020 12:44 pm | |
TFLYTSNBN
|
Interesting how Creepy Joe Biden comes in far from first. This disproves President Trump's alleged motive that is cited to justify impeachment. Even Lame Stream Journalists were beginning to cover the Biden corruption months before the phone call to Ukraine. If anything, the impeachment was a distraction from the Biden corruption.
|
Top |
Re: Iowa caucus | |
---|---|
by gcomeau » Sat Feb 08, 2020 1:42 pm | |
gcomeau
Posts: 2747
|
Oh FFS. 1. Biden was when Trump ordered the extortion campaign, and is still now, the national frontrunner to get the nomination. 2. While the rich kids of powerful parents getting plum jobs is an issue, it is not illegal and not a valid subject of investigation. 3. Even if it WAS you have it investigated through proper official channels, not by secretly sending your personal political operative to pressure a foreign government into doing it by extorting them either withheld official acts of your office or illegally withheld critically needed wartime aid |
Top |
Re: Iowa caucus | |
---|---|
by n7axw » Sat Feb 08, 2020 5:30 pm | |
n7axw
Posts: 5997
|
Your number 3 is an important point, illustrating the difference between a mob boss and a real president... Don - When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
|
Top |