Guns, Guns Guns

smr wrote:Take the case of the rancher in Nevada, the BLM was seizing his cattle illegally and they threatened to shoot the local families that gathered together to stop the slaughter of the cattle. CNN said that the militia had snipers their to shoot the federal agents. Why is their no video evidence of snipers or militiamen shown? That's because their was none and if you need proof about what happened go look up the links within this gun topic because I posted it.

This evil man chose a gun free zone to attack innocent law abiding citizens and murder Christians. Take the evil man from the SC shooting, he chose the church because the church had no armed security to stop him rather than the local college!

smr wrote:


http://www.reid.senate.gov/press_releases/2015-08-24-reid-remarks-at-national-clean-energy-summit


So Kiwi understand they increased his fees by 200% that are supposed to go to maintain the land as free range grazing lands. However, the fees were not applied equally to everyone but selectively. Second, the head of BLM was a political appointee of guess who...Henry Reed. Why did many of Deputy Sheriffs call in sick that day? Hmmm????? Third, the local sheriff is a local political ally of guess who...Henry Reed. Now Henry Reed called Mister Bundy a domestic terrorist on the floor of the Senate! The same Mister Bundy called for a peaceful resistance to the illegal seizure of his cattle. The BLM imported 200 agents from outside of Nevada because the locals refused to participate. Fourth, the court order was being disputed by the Nevada state government due to interpretations of a statute. The case was being appealed by Bundy and the state of Nevada. Methinks something is wrong in Denmark...I mean Nevada.

Hey Kiwi did you watch the video? Where is the militia? Where are the snipers? Sounds like political rhetoric. The sheriff said on the video over a megaphone that they will fire on them! The locals (men, women, and children) replied that they were unarmed. They formed into a line an preceded to back down the BLM!.

Our government has history of using force. Take Waco, they could have continued the beseize the Ranch. Hunger would eventually forced most Branch Davidian members to surrender. 76 people died needlessly in Waco. Just remember the elite write the history.

smr wrote:The E...please don't come with racism argument to justify anarchy and rioting. Hands up don't shoot....false narrative that created the riots.

The E...Germany was so civilized that they executed 8 million men, women, and children because they were Jewish. I was married to a German girl and grandparents talked about Hitler. They were teenagers during WW2. The grandmother contends that the holocaust would never had happened if the government had not seized all the guns. She claims that they had noway to resist the government.

The seizing of guns within the country equals a civil war for America! What good is security for loss of our liberties and freedoms.

Daryl wrote:In today's news -
A SIMPLE childish fight over a puppy led an 11-year-old boy to shoot and kill his eight-year-old neighbour in the US state of Tennessee.

Latasha Dyer says her daughter was playing outside when the boy asked to see her puppy. Little McKayla said “no” and shortly after was shot in the chest.

smr wrote:With the Oregon shooting, the mainstream media neglects the mention that this is the 2nd domestic home grown Muslim terrorist within a year. This evil man chose a gun free zone to attack innocent law abiding citizens and murder Christians.

John Parker, a 36-year-old Army veteran studying to become a drug and alcohol counselor, is among the UCC students who hold weapons permits and bring guns to campus. He had his gun and his license with him on campus Thursday when the shooting took place.

He was in the college's veterans center, just a few buildings away from Synder Hall, with some other students who were similarly permitted and armed, he told The Oregonian.

A college employee talked them out of leaving to try to use their guns to save others. The active shooter could have taken them down first. Law enforcement officers already on the scene would not have known their guns would be used to defend students and instructors, not hurt them, he said.

"If we would have run across the field, we would have been targets," he said. "We made a good choice at the time."

Daryl wrote:In today's news -
A SIMPLE childish fight over a puppy led an 11-year-old boy to shoot and kill his eight-year-old neighbour in the US state of Tennessee.

Latasha Dyer says her daughter was playing outside when the boy asked to see her puppy. Little McKayla said “no” and shortly after was shot in the chest.

Tenshinai wrote:


And this is exactly why guns should not be sold to anyone, always kept safely stored and NOT handed to children unless under constant oversight.

Annachie wrote:SMR, I think you missed a fundamental point. It's not the governments job to ban guns, it's their job to regulate them. If that involves saying that some are not for the general public, then that's fine. If that involvez saying some people are not allowed yo own or use one due to criminal or mental history, that is also fine.

If the second is so important and unviolatable, why don't prisoners have guns? Where's the NRA campaign to arm them?
Why do most houses of government ban them within the building. Even states that allow them to be carried everywhere else? Again no NRA bitching there.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk