Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 125 guests

Haven Victorious

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Haven Victorious
Post by cthia   » Wed Dec 12, 2018 5:23 am

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

Lift them skirts! Do peer under the skin!
But beware, sometimes they go commando.

Oh how I love this thread! But the demand on popcorn is approaching illegalities. One can keep just so much corn on hand before being suspected of distilling whiskey. LOL

GregD wrote:Elizabeth could have colluded with Benjamin, and HE could have sent "Steadholder Harrington" off to negotiate a peace treaty with Haven at any time.


It certainly sounds like a good idea, and that's what I think Harrington was ultimately supposed to accomplish. But, remember, there was no way for Beth to know how safe it was to send anyone. Let alone Honor. And if it was to be done, the most efficient plan would have been to include Honor, someone who can cross reference the cats emotions and someone who had become a formidable diplomat and politician in her own right.

Who thinks it would have been prudent to send anyone to Haven, let alone Honor, when it was still being run by Saint-Just, Pierre and Ransom? Or, if it was still being run by people like the above during Eloise's reign? It would have been tantamount to suicide. The only reason Honor ended up on a road trip was because she truly believed in the Peeps. And since Honor was a wanted criminal on Haven, I thought there was going to be trouble had it not been for Eighth Fleet. Honor's sentence was never officially dismissed was it?

At any rate, I think a field trip with plans to negotiate a treaty was too ambitious. Even Honor's mission was desperately conceived. A field trip to gauge the sincerity of the enemy should have been the mission, so that a treaty could be negotiated later and a true cease fire implemented now. Both Beth and Eloise had the responsibility and safety of her citizens weighing on her back. And neither operated in a vacuum.

But, Honor was the only one who could pull it off. Eloise trusted and believed only in Honor (as everyone in the galaxy did due to the integrity-laced seeds Honor sowed) and Honor trusted the Cats.

The time factor was the fly in the ointment.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: Haven Victorious
Post by Galactic Sapper   » Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:28 am

Galactic Sapper
Captain of the List

Posts: 524
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 1:11 pm

NortonIDaughter wrote:As you say, she's seen regime changes on Haven before-- one of the major drivers in SVW and FoD was that the Libs et al wanted to believe that the Pierre Coup could be a change for good that ended the war (ha!). And through them all, the Peeps had remained a vicious threat.

Which is why I think she was negligent as hell for not sending a treecat to Haven after the Theisman Coup. I cannot think of a single thing more important than knowing whether these were more leopards with the same spots, or tigers of a different stripe.

A point to consider: immediately after the Theisman coup, Elizabeth could not know how stable Pritchard's government would be. Haven had seen two successful coups and at least two failed coups in ten years. Regardless of how genuine Theisman and Pritchard were personally, Elizabeth had to keep in mind that they might not be in power by the time a treaty was worked out.

It obviously didn't stop her from negotiating at all, but at that point she needed a treaty that even a possibly-belligerent government formed by a new coup would also find acceptable. Later on, as the stability of the new-old constitution and government became apparent - maybe the six months before Thunderbolt - then maybe Elizabeth could have risked negotiating around the High Ridge government and sent a treecat with the negotiator.

Also remember that treecats were just starting to use sign language a few months prior to thunderbolt. Even though a treecat could have read people as well as they could ever do, their ability to communicate their insights into a person's personality was lacking
Top
Re: Haven Victorious
Post by runsforcelery   » Wed Dec 12, 2018 3:20 pm

runsforcelery
First Space Lord

Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:39 am
Location: South Carolina

Galactic Sapper wrote:
NortonIDaughter wrote:As you say, she's seen regime changes on Haven before-- one of the major drivers in SVW and FoD was that the Libs et al wanted to believe that the Pierre Coup could be a change for good that ended the war (ha!). And through them all, the Peeps had remained a vicious threat.

Which is why I think she was negligent as hell for not sending a treecat to Haven after the Theisman Coup. I cannot think of a single thing more important than knowing whether these were more leopards with the same spots, or tigers of a different stripe.

A point to consider: immediately after the Theisman coup, Elizabeth could not know how stable Pritchard's government would be. Haven had seen two successful coups and at least two failed coups in ten years. Regardless of how genuine Theisman and Pritchard were personally, Elizabeth had to keep in mind that they might not be in power by the time a treaty was worked out.

It obviously didn't stop her from negotiating at all, but at that point she needed a treaty that even a possibly-belligerent government formed by a new coup would also find acceptable. Later on, as the stability of the new-old constitution and government became apparent - maybe the six months before Thunderbolt - then maybe Elizabeth could have risked negotiating around the High Ridge government and sent a treecat with the negotiator.

Also remember that treecats were just starting to use sign language a few months prior to thunderbolt. Even though a treecat could have read people as well as they could ever do, their ability to communicate their insights into a person's personality was lacking



There are all kinds of reasons for Eloise not to have personally negotiated with or sent a special envoy, outside the High Ridge negotiators, to Haven. Part of it is constitutional, since she would have been stepping on a Parliamentary prerogative to do anything of the sort without the approval and support of the current government (which was High Ridge's). Part of it is that fact that she hated and distrusted all Peeps, and with damned good cause. Part of it was that as has been pointed out she had no idea if the Theisman-Pritchart government was ultimately going to stand or fall. Part of it was that the (accurate) rumors that Theisman had simply shot Saint-Just out of hand without even a pretense of due process left his escutcheon just a tad tarnished in her eyes . . . and suggested that he wasn't all that different from Saint-Just (and, of course, it was well known that Pritchart had been a leading terrorist, assassin, and murderer before the Pierre Coup and then served the SS as a political commissar).

My point here is that it would never have occurred to her to send a treecat-augmented "fact-finding mission" to Nouveau Paris for a whole bunch of reasons, including the fact that right up until the very verge of Operation Thunderbolt, the treecats wouldn't have been able to communicate very much except "we like these guys" about what they were picking up.

That, however, is secondary — if not tertiary — to the fact that all the evidence she possessed told her that there was no significant difference between the Theisman-Pritchart regime and the Pierre-Saint-Just regime. Both had come to power in a violent coup, both of them had ruthlessly eliminated the group previously in power, one of them was a self-confessed terrorist/assassin, and they were currently involved in a four-way (or more) civil war, so it wasn't at all clear for quite a while that they were even going to survive.

Frankly, it didn't matter who they were or how they might differ from the preceding regime(s). I mean, literally, it did not matter, for a bunch of reasons. One was that the Havenite navy was totally out-classed against the RMN. There was no way that any Havenite admiral was going to be stupid enough to go up against the Royal Manticoran Navy when Haven didn't even have podnoughts yet, much less the MDMs to put aboard them, and according to all of her intelligence agencies, that was the case. I mentioned that she had a little of the Manticoran hubris herself, but that's another way of saying that she was guided by the expert analysis of all of her intelligence agencies. And what they were telling her was that Haven had been totally defeated (militarily), whether or not Nouveau Paris had been occupied, and that — judging from the self-evident capabilities of the ships actually engaged in their civil war (bearing in mind that Theisman was deliberately concealing the existence of the SD(P)s being built at Bolthole) — there was no prospect whatsoever of Haven being able to successfully resume hostilities. That's why she was so focused on the domestic front.

From Manticore's perspective, at least until the existence of Havenite SD(P)s became known, what happened in Nouveau Paris and the rest of the former People's Republic's territory was up to the Peeps. It wasn't even on Manticore's radar at that point, and wouldn't be until it was clear that someone was going to win. That was the whole basis of Descroix's delaying tactic of "waiting until the situation stabilizes," and that tactic was effective because when she first began deploying it, it was totally apropos. Eloise and Tom's personal character really became relevant only after it was clear that the Theisman coup (unlike the Levelers and two or three other abortive attempts against the Committee) was going to stand. And even then, until they demonstrated that they had podnoughts of their own, there was no way that they represented any realistic threat to the Star Kingdom's interests or citizens.

From our perspective outside, looking in, and having lived behind Eloise's and Tom's eyes while they were fighting to redeem the Republic of the Péricard constitution, of course Elizabeth needed to send Honor to discover that, under the skin, she and Eloise were soul sisters. From my perspective as the author, that would have sort of tended to short-circuit the story line, but from the perspective of people living in the Honorverse, that would have been a far better outcome than Thunderbolt, the Battle of Manticore, and all of the hundreds of thousands of people who were killed. The thing is that it was not at all evident to people living inside the Honorverse, without that omniscient narrator perspective, and that Elizabeth's actions — and responsibilities — can be judged only on the basis of what Elizabeth knew and on her judgment as quite possibly the most experienced wartime head of state in the entire human-explored galaxy.

**************************************************

And in response to why Eloise made the call for Operation Beatrice rather than simply telling Manticore "we surrender," I thought I had made the logic fairly clear in the book, although I may not have.

Haven's problem was that Manticore had just demonstrated the existence of Apollo (although Haven still didn't know all of its capabilities); Haven's attempt to arrange a summit to negotiate peace had failed (and been vehemently rejected by Elizabeth); it was obvious to Theisman and Pritchart that Elizabeth had decided there was no difference between them and the team of Pierre and Saint-Just; and if Apollo was put into full production and deployment, Haven's military position was hopeless.

The one point that I didn't mention in that paragraph is that the restored Republic was still incredibly fragile. Eloise believed that an abject surrender to Manticore would fatally undercut the legitimacy of her new government in the eyes of the Havenite electorate. That was also the reason that she couldn't simply tell Elizabeth "Hey, Arnie Giancola forged the diplomatic correspondence he showed us! Can we talk?" because the evidence that the ranking member of her Cabinet (remember, he was her legal successor under the Constitution if she died in office) had been guilty of treason would also have seriously undermined her administration's legitimacy, and that (by process of extension) would have undermined — indeed, probably fatally wounded — the Péricard Constitution she had fought for decades to restore.

That was the context against which she had to make the go/no go decision on Operation Beatrice, and at that time her intelligence people (who had been doing a pretty damned good job so far) did not believe Apollo was in general deployment. (In fact, they were pretty much right; it wasn't in general deployment, just closer to that than they had estimated.) So according to everything she knew, there was still a very brief window in which the operational and tactical balance of power would still be very close to even on a ship-for-ship basis . . . and the Republic had a definite edge in tonnage and total podnoughts.

If the Republic surrendered, or if the Haven System was militarily conquered, the odds favored the collapse of the restored constitution and Republic and the high probability that something at least as bad as the Committee of Public Safety would emerge to replace it.

If Operation Beatrice succeeded, Haven could extend the most generous terms imaginable to Manticore, and thereby prove that the restored Republic was not the People's Republic of Haven. And doing that, would give her administration, and by extension her entire government and above all the Constitution a degree of legitimacy that virtually no other outcome could have afforded.

This was a woman who had dedicated her entire life to restoring the Republic and who had seen the man she loved die in that Republic's defense. The restoration of the Péricard constitution was her memorial to her raped and murdered sister and every other human being who had been casually destroyed by the Legislaturalists and State Security. It was the vindication of all the friends she had sacrificed and lost in her long fight, and it was the justification for all the blood she had personally shed.

She was prepared to do whatever it took to honor her oath to "protect and defend" the Constitution of the Republic of Haven and the Republic itself "against all enemies, foreign and domestic."

So she did.

As it turned out, the discovery of the Mesan Alignment and the Manties' face-off with the Solarian League, gave Eloise a trump card which probably far exceeded the value of winning the Battle of Manticore, both domestically and — most assuredly — in interstellar terms. Unfortunately, no one in-universe could have seen that coming, and so she launched Operation Beatrice not because she wanted to, and not because she thought it was a good option, but because she thought it was the at least bad of the options available to her.


"Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as Piglet came back from the dead.
Top
Re: Haven Victorious
Post by cthia   » Wed Dec 12, 2018 5:59 pm

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

What!!!? It really is Christmas time. :o
Am I dreaming??? . . . Pinch. . .pinch. Ouch! This is real!

TOLD U SO TOLD U SO TOLD U SO TOLD U SO! TOLD. U. SO!

runsforcelery wrote:Part of it was that the (accurate) rumors that Theisman had simply shot Saint-Just out of hand without even a pretense of due process left his escutcheon just a tad tarnished in her eyes . . . and suggested that he wasn't all that different from Saint-Just (and, of course, it was well known that Pritchart had been a leading terrorist, assassin, and murderer before the Pierre Coup and then served the SS as a political commissar).
Do pardon my bold of the author's text.

OMG!

The exact same things I argued until I was blue in the face and green in the gills in a certain thread where I accused Theisman of - surely in the eyes of many Havenite citizens - murder! I also went as far as suggesting that Elizabeth wouldn't like Theisman's actions so much either! That thread was closed. I thought there'd be pitchforks at my door. Don't sugarcoat it RFC, Beth was astonished that Saint-Just was MURDERED! And if Beth felt that way, surely some Havenite citizens did as well! I said it was a bad way to begin the newly established Republic.

I'll take apologies from all of you anytime you like. :roll:

runsforcelery wrote:snip
That, however, is secondary — if not tertiary — to the fact that all the evidence she possessed told her that there was no significant difference between the Theisman-Pritchart regime and the Pierre-Saint-Just regime. Both had come to power in a violent coup, both of them had ruthlessly eliminated the group previously in power, one of them was a self-confessed terrorist/assassin, and they were currently involved in a four-way (or more) civil war, so it wasn't at all clear for quite a while that they were even going to survive.

My same point in that same castrated thread of mine. Theisman's actions made him appear as if he wasn't much better than the regime he replaced. And if Eloise would have at least went through the motions and charged him and then had the charges dismissed, at least it would have appeared that she took the Constitution seriously and Beth would have taken note of that!

runsforcelery wrote:Part of it is that fact that she hated and distrusted all Peeps, and with damned good cause. Part of it was that as has been pointed out she had no idea if the Theisman-Pritchart government was ultimately going to stand or fall.

My point here is that it would never have occurred to her to send a treecat-augmented "fact-finding mission" to Nouveau Paris for a whole bunch of reasons, including the fact that right up until the very verge of Operation Thunderbolt, the treecats wouldn't have been able to communicate very much except "we like these guys" about what they were picking up.

My point as well. She didn't trust the Peeps, so there was no reason to send Cats to discover what she already knew. If she had thought there was a chance thst the leopard's stripes had changed, then . . .

So you see Peeps! It doesn't matter when all of you disagree with me. It doesn't change the truth!

.
Last edited by cthia on Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:02 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: Haven Victorious
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:00 pm

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1958
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

I am going to expand on RFCs comments - but won't bother clipping it, as it was long.

Remember from the book, Eloise and Tom had no proof of Giancola's treason - just suspicious pointers. Any attempt to trot that out is going to look like a attempt to purge her political opponents on trumped up evidence (and since he is dead, blaming someone who can't fight back) - highly suggestive of the tactics of both the Legilaturists and the CPS, and would have certainly doomed the government and constitution.
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top
Re: Haven Victorious
Post by GregD   » Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:04 pm

GregD
Commander

Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 12:29 pm

tlb wrote:
GregD wrote:First, let's consider the outlines of a treaty. There's four types of systems that Manticore has conquered:
1: Uninhabited systems with strategic significance that Manticore won't give back
2: Uninhabited systems Manticore's willing to give back once there's no war
3: Inhabited systems Manticore would offer membership to
4: Inhabited systems Manticore does't want

A treaty where Manticore keeps the 1st, gives back the 2nd, the 3rd have a plebiscite with 3 options (perhaps ranked choice voting), & the 4th have a plebiscite with 2 options (stay independent or go back to Haven), plus whatever peace guarantees that Grayson / Harrington need.

Manticore gets sole control over which systems are in group 3, and which are in group 4.

There is one big flaw in your plan right here: how do Honor and Haven get to decide what systems (inhabited or not) that Manticore will want?


They don't. Manticore makes that decision when it accepts the Treaty.

It's not Haven's business, and it's not Grayson's, as to what planets Manticore makes offers to.
Top
Re: Haven Victorious
Post by GregD   » Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:08 pm

GregD
Commander

Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 12:29 pm

fallsfromtrees wrote:You are apparently missing one of the key points in RFC's response. A private diplomatic mission, no matter how successful, would set a precedent that Elizabeth was NOT willing to set. Although it would undermine the current administration, in her view that administration was not going to last forever, and she didn't want the precedent of independent diplomatic missions - which might well be used to undermine the monarchy and a favourable administration - - it might not happen during her reign, but she wasn't going to saddle Roger with that problem decades or centuries later.


It's not a private diplomatic mission.

It's a diplomatic mission by Grayson, with the chief diplomat being Steadholder Honor Harrington.

An entirely legally separate person from Duchess Honor Harrington.

As Galactic Sapper pointed out, it would be a peace mission by all of Manticore's allies.

The same allies that Manticore screwed over when it unilaterally accepted St. Just's "cease fire".
Top
Re: Haven Victorious
Post by noblehunter   » Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:10 pm

noblehunter
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 385
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2015 8:49 pm

In defense of Theisman, there would have been major political costs in a public trial, too. Not to mention trumping up charges against deposed political enemies was also a common tactic of the previous regimes. A trial might not have convinced Elizabeth of the new regime's pure intentions any more than the shooting did.
Top
Re: Haven Victorious
Post by GregD   » Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:18 pm

GregD
Commander

Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 12:29 pm

Jonathan_S wrote:Edit - I see tlb managed to post a lot of this while I was composing this
Galactic Sapper wrote:I think it would be impractical - for reasons rfc enumerated and some that he didn't - but it would have been karmic justice to send Steadholder Harrington to Haven to negotiate a treaty in the name of every member of the Alliance except Manticore. It would be the mirror image of High Ridge betraying the Alliance by unilaterally accepting St. Just's cease-fire. With the approval of the Crown, the Protector, and the shadow PM, she would have negotiated a treaty that would be in Manticore's best interest as well as everyone else's. Presenting it to the Lords with the ultimatum of "approve this or our allies abandon us" would have toppled High Ridge no matter which option he took. Choosing to approve it would have taken a bit longer but that's about it.

It's an amusing concept, but Haven doesn't seem to get much out of this treaty. Sure the other members of the Alliance (OMoA) sign a peace treaty and take their fleets home (though Grayson is the only really significant one there) but Manticore has enough ships and they've rolled out defensive LAC bases during the ceasefire to continue to occupy all those systems with their fleet alone - so Haven doesn't get control of any the systems back.

I guess the OMoA could schedule plebiscites - but they'd be non-binding on Manticore. So if Manticoran domestic politics don't fall into line and sign on to the treaty then Haven has no obvious further things to give up as an incentive to negotiation. And if they resume war, even against just Manticore, just after singing a treaty that probably looks bad for them -- more reminders of how their previous regimes acted. Plus Grayson at least is going to be nervious about sitting on the sidelines after Haven goes on the offensive since they've been a target of their fleets before and if Manticore falls they know they can't stand on their own. So Haven can't even count on a treaty keeping the OMaA neutral should the RHN be ordered to use military force in an attempt to compel Manticore to agree to the treaty.


As far as I can see it's all downside to Haven. (I guess it might make it slightly harder for Manticore to justify a preemptive military decapitation strike - maybe. But don't put anything past a sufficiently panicked High Ridge)


What's in it for Haven?

1: Grayson's providing a significant portion of the Alliance military. Manticore would be hurting if it started fighting again without that support.

2: The likelihood of the House of Lords NOT approving a reasonable Peace Treaty, one that all their allies, including that "Grayson warmongers", have approved, is pretty much zero.

Seriously? If the gov't refused the Treaty, and the Lords went along with them, then the people paying all those high wartime taxes would start lynching members of the House of Lords until they were left with a more reasonable body.

Hell, they wouldn't have to do that. They'd just start challenging them to duels. Starting with parents who have kids in the military, kids who could end up dying in pointless battles with Haven because those vicious weasels in the Lords want their power, even at the pointless cost of their kids lives.

Re-read AoV, and the civilian disaffection with the war. The High Ridge government was able to draw things out by keeping all the negotiations secret. Blowing up the secrecy takes that option away
Top
Re: Haven Victorious
Post by tlb   » Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:33 pm

tlb
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3960
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 am

GregD wrote:First, let's consider the outlines of a treaty. There's four types of systems that Manticore has conquered:
1: Uninhabited systems with strategic significance that Manticore won't give back
2: Uninhabited systems Manticore's willing to give back once there's no war
3: Inhabited systems Manticore would offer membership to
4: Inhabited systems Manticore does't want

A treaty where Manticore keeps the 1st, gives back the 2nd, the 3rd have a plebiscite with 3 options (perhaps ranked choice voting), & the 4th have a plebiscite with 2 options (stay independent or go back to Haven), plus whatever peace guarantees that Grayson / Harrington need.

Manticore gets sole control over which systems are in group 3, and which are in group 4.

tlb wrote:There is one big flaw in your plan right here: how do Honor and Haven get to decide what systems (inhabited or not) that Manticore will want?

GregD wrote:They don't. Manticore makes that decision when it accepts the Treaty.

It's not Haven's business, and it's not Grayson's, as to what planets Manticore makes offers to.

It is Haven's business also, that is part of what Manticore and Haven have to negotiate; which is why that cannot be settled for Manticore by just Harrington and Haven negotiating. Manticore gave up the chance to say take it or else, when they accepted the ceasefire and allowed things to drag on for about 4 years.

A treaty between the allies and Haven cannot be expected to solve all problems between Manticore and Haven.

Remember that lies about the eventual status of the occupied planets is what lead to the resumption of hostilities.
Top

Return to Honorverse