Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests

Rachel Mayhew

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Rachel Mayhew
Post by Silverwall   » Thu Oct 05, 2017 2:54 am

Silverwall
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 388
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 12:53 am

pappilon wrote:
Silverwall wrote:She will be placed on a capital ship, you just don't put princesses of the blood on tin cans. ----> Points at the future George the 6th serving on HMS Collingwood a St Vincent class Dreadnought.


But ...but wait! Abigail didn't serve on an SD for her snotty cruise. She's not much less the daughter of a head of state. And our (and their) Duchess Steadholder Alexander-Harrington is also a head of state. (Dang those Graysons, they'll hang a steading around anyone's neck)

I wouldn't be surprised over a plot twist that puts her on a Havenite ship. GA and all that. Possibly a brand spanking new one fresh out of refitting in Beowulf from Bolthole.


To be blunt Abigail is in WW1 terms a princess of Denmark or luxemborg. Rachel is Literally in the same position as the future KG VI. Second or third in line for the throne of a great power.
Top
Re: Rachel Mayhew
Post by Vince   » Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:34 am

Vince
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:43 pm

Silverwall wrote:She will be placed on a capital ship, you just don't put princesses of the blood on tin cans. ----> Points at the future George the 6th serving on HMS Collingwood a St Vincent class Dreadnought.
pappilon wrote:
But ...but wait! Abigail didn't serve on an SD for her snotty cruise. She's not much less the daughter of a head of state. And our (and their) Duchess Steadholder Alexander-Harrington is also a head of state. (Dang those Graysons, they'll hang a steading around anyone's neck)

I wouldn't be surprised over a plot twist that puts her on a Havenite ship. GA and all that. Possibly a brand spanking new one fresh out of refitting in Beowulf from Bolthole.
Silverwall wrote:To be blunt Abigail is in WW1 terms a princess of Denmark or luxemborg. Rachel is Literally in the same position as the future KG VI. Second or third in line for the throne of a great power.

While Abigail is in line for her father's Steadholdership, Rachel is not in line for the Protectorship of Grayson:
Ashes of Victory, Chapter 14 wrote:For once in her life, however, not even Allison Chou Harrington's intransigence had been enough. The fact that the Conclave of Steadholders had accepted Faith as Honor's heir, formally named Howard Clinkscales her regent, determined the composition of her Regency Council (which had not, as originally structured, included the Steadholder Mother), and transferred the Harrington Key to her as the second Steadholder Harrington had represented an enormous concession on the Conservatives' part. Of course, all those arrangements had come tumbling down when Honor turned out to be alive after all, but Faith remained her legally designated heir, and Allison was well aware that most of the steadholders, even those who belonged to what passed for the Keys' liberal wing, would really have preferred for her to be clever enough to have made sure James was born first. Since she'd been so inconsiderate as to produce a girl child first, however, and since Protector Benjamin had insisted, they had grudgingly agreed that it was time to allow female children to inherit their fathers' keys. They'd insisted on grandfathering in a stipulation to guarantee the succession of the sons of those among them who'd already produced male heirs, even if, as most Grayson men did, those sons had older sisters, and they'd specifically exempted the protectorship itself, despite Benjamin's best efforts, but they'd accepted yet another of his reforms.
Italics are the author's, boldface and underlined text is my emphasis.

So Rachel's midshipman's cruise may have much in common to Abigail's in the choice of what ship she would be assigned to (it should be noted that High Admiral Matthews was directly involved in that decision, as well as directly meeting with Abigail to inform her of the details--primarily political--of her midshipman's cruise). The fact that she is not in line of succession for the Protectorship of Grayson makes it more likely she would make her cruise on a non-capital ship similar to HMS Gauntlet. The fact that she is the Protector's eldest daughter, even while not in line of succession, would tend to push back on that choice, however. I suspect that Benjamin's input would play a very large part on what ship she would end up on.
-------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes.
Top
Re: Rachel Mayhew
Post by Eagleeye   » Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:40 am

Eagleeye
Commodore

Posts: 750
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 4:41 am
Location: Halle/Saale, Germany

Silverwall wrote:
To be blunt Abigail is in WW1 terms a princess of Denmark or luxemborg. Rachel is Literally in the same position as the future KG VI. Second or third in line for the throne of a great power.


There's a shortstory (by Jane Lindskold, if I'm right) about Elizabeth's brother, who was her heir at the time, and his snottie cruise. He went aboard a CL (iIrc) to Masada - where he found his later wife.
Top
Re: Rachel Mayhew
Post by Vince   » Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:48 am

Vince
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:43 pm

Eagleeye wrote:
Silverwall wrote:
To be blunt Abigail is in WW1 terms a princess of Denmark or luxemborg. Rachel is Literally in the same position as the future KG VI. Second or third in line for the throne of a great power.


There's a shortstory (by Jane Lindskold, if I'm right) about Elizabeth's brother, who was her heir at the time, and his snottie cruise. He went aboard a CL (iIrc) to Masada - where he found his later wife.

Promised Land by Jane Lindskold, in The Service of the Sword anthology, where Prince Michael made his midshipman's cruise aboard 'Her Majesty's light cruiser Intransigent.'
-------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes.
Top
Re: Rachel Mayhew
Post by munroburton   » Thu Oct 05, 2017 6:33 am

munroburton
Admiral

Posts: 2368
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:16 am
Location: Scotland

Vince wrote:While Abigail is in line for her father's Steadholdership, Rachel is not in line for the Protectorship of Grayson:
Ashes of Victory, Chapter 14 wrote:For once in her life, however, not even Allison Chou Harrington's intransigence had been enough. The fact that the Conclave of Steadholders had accepted Faith as Honor's heir, formally named Howard Clinkscales her regent, determined the composition of her Regency Council (which had not, as originally structured, included the Steadholder Mother), and transferred the Harrington Key to her as the second Steadholder Harrington had represented an enormous concession on the Conservatives' part. Of course, all those arrangements had come tumbling down when Honor turned out to be alive after all, but Faith remained her legally designated heir, and Allison was well aware that most of the steadholders, even those who belonged to what passed for the Keys' liberal wing, would really have preferred for her to be clever enough to have made sure James was born first. Since she'd been so inconsiderate as to produce a girl child first, however, and since Protector Benjamin had insisted, they had grudgingly agreed that it was time to allow female children to inherit their fathers' keys. They'd insisted on grandfathering in a stipulation to guarantee the succession of the sons of those among them who'd already produced male heirs, even if, as most Grayson men did, those sons had older sisters, and they'd specifically exempted the protectorship itself, despite Benjamin's best efforts, but they'd accepted yet another of his reforms.
Italics are the author's, boldface and underlined text is my emphasis.

So Rachel's midshipman's cruise may have much in common to Abigail's in the choice of what ship she would be assigned to (it should be noted that High Admiral Matthews was directly involved in that decision, as well as directly meeting with Abigail to inform her of the details--primarily political--of her midshipman's cruise). The fact that she is not in line of succession for the Protectorship of Grayson makes it more likely she would make her cruise on a non-capital ship similar to HMS Gauntlet. The fact that she is the Protector's eldest daughter, even while not in line of succession, would tend to push back on that choice, however. I suspect that Benjamin's input would play a very large part on what ship she would end up on.


It's definitely not a Grayson precedent, but one of the Andermani Emperors went mad and tried to appoint a rose bush as his Chancellor. His sister subsequently took control of the IAN Home Fleet, had herself legally declared male and reigned for thirty-eight years as "Gustav VII".
Top
Re: Rachel Mayhew
Post by Maldorian   » Thu Oct 05, 2017 6:52 am

Maldorian
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 251
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:54 am

I don´t know on what ship she go, but I think it would be a heavy Cruiser or a Battlecruiser! Why? Wallers don´t come around. They are not so good to learn something. And I wouldn´t put a such improtant officer on a smaller ship that can easier get lost in a fight.

A havenite ship? I don´t know if that would be good for the first trip, maybe later.

Maybe Zavala get the command of a bigger ship.....
Top
Re: Rachel Mayhew
Post by Daryl   » Thu Oct 05, 2017 7:20 am

Daryl
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3499
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:57 am
Location: Queensland Australia

You are all being rational, and also cognisant of plot requirements. In OTL military they are just as likely to put her in a LAC equivalent, or a shore posting.
Top
Re: Rachel Mayhew
Post by Weird Harold   » Thu Oct 05, 2017 7:57 am

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

ldwechsler wrote:Abigail won't be her commander. Abigail is too junior for the job. She was a very early promotion to lieutenant and then early to be Tac officer. She is only a few years out of the Academy. I recall vaguely that she was four years older than Helen Zilwicki.

Five years in, no matter who you are, you don't command.

However, I could see Rachel Mayhew on the same ship as Abigail. That way she could have a "big sister" who might understand problems.


It is possible that Abigail and Helen Zilwicki are both due promotion and new jobs. Abigail as XO and Helen as ATO (and training officer) aboard Commodore Terekhov or Oversteegen's flagship? Both Terekhov and Oversteegen have some experience running a "Princess Cruise" and each iteration seems to add one more "Princess" to the mix. :lol:
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Rachel Mayhew
Post by Dauntless   » Thu Oct 05, 2017 8:28 am

Dauntless
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 12:54 pm
Location: United Kingdom

intresting question.

I have to agree with most of what was said. Rachel is important but she is not the the heir to the protercship so a SD is way too much ship, even if SD deployments are likely to be more interesting then the standard due to possibly being used in small detachments to swat any BF punishment fleets that try to hammer core worlds or at least shell worlds that decide to secede.

still she is the Benjamin's daughter and both honor and elizabeth would hate for something to happen, more for the inevitable fallout among the keys and the pain it would cause Benjamin rather then worries of problems from Benjamin, so they are not going to use anything smaller then a CA, and probably a SAG-c at that or a BC.

maybe a flight 4 reliant deployed to selisa? should be enough interesting things happening there to keep her and hipper busy without their being exposed to undue risk. and nearly a 1m tons of starship should keep the keys from bleating too much compared to if they used a roland or avalon.
Top
Re: Rachel Mayhew
Post by n7axw   » Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:18 am

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Dauntless wrote:intresting question.

I have to agree with most of what was said. Rachel is important but she is not the the heir to the protercship so a SD is way too much ship, even if SD deployments are likely to be more interesting then the standard due to possibly being used in small detachments to swat any BF punishment fleets that try to hammer core worlds or at least shell worlds that decide to secede.

still she is the Benjamin's daughter and both honor and elizabeth would hate for something to happen, more for the inevitable fallout among the keys and the pain it would cause Benjamin rather then worries of problems from Benjamin, so they are not going to use anything smaller then a CA, and probably a SAG-c at that or a BC.

maybe a flight 4 reliant deployed to selisa? should be enough interesting things happening there to keep her and hipper busy without their being exposed to undue risk. and nearly a 1m tons of starship should keep the keys from bleating too much compared to if they used a roland or avalon.


I would expect her posting to be handled similar to Abigail's except that there would probably be a bit more political pressure to make it Grayson rather than Manticoran. Her dad is tthe Protector, after all.

Don

-
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top

Return to Honorverse