Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests

New Pod layer new CLAC new LAC

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
New Pod layer new CLAC new LAC
Post by Lord Skimper   » Wed Jun 22, 2016 12:14 pm

Lord Skimper
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1736
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:49 am
Location: Calgary, Nova, Gryphon.

Given the whole disperia of Pod layer SD and CLAC fragile as a freighter and LAC being Tough as nails and Pods total offense and no defense. Let's redesign and change everything.

A Tough as SD(P) mothership. Made larger, Armoured with dual chase launch bays one at each end. Dual LAC Pod bays hollow, but with a cylindrical core and central structural section, with all the important stuff, bottles, etc...

Call it the Whitehaven Class.

The Ships should have Energy base broadsides with modern upgraded Lasers, of a variety of sizes, DD through to SD, offering an up-close Energy anti ship weapon load and medium range anti missile duty. Lots of CM's lots more than any other ship 100+ per broadside, and SD PD clusters. Two Keyhole II/III per broadside focused on long range sensors with a focus on Anti missile defense.

In "end tube" chase launched bays, two three four heavily armoured bay doors launching the LAC Highlander 282, Pod LAC. Each craft carrying 2 Apollo Mk23 pods in each broadside. 3 LAC lasers optimised for Anti ship/missile duties and Katana chase CM/Viper launchers and PD clusters. Each capable of controlling the Apollo missile and clustered Mk23 missiles. With target relay information from the main ship. Telemetry for 1/2/3/4 pods of missiles per salvo.

With 100 such LAC Pods 50 per cavity of the LAC Pod layer main ship. Think of a large rotatory LAC launch system similar to the Japanese underground car parking parkades. see youtube if you don't know. The whole inner system in the cavity can reload the LAC at key points, pulling crew off into the ship proper and having repair bays for damaged ships etc...

This makes a ship with much more survivability and much bigger fully controlled Missile salvos. instead on an Invictus with 200 Apollo controlled missile salvos. You end up with a Whitehaven class Ship firing Apollo Salvos of 900/1800/2700/3600 missiles. let's be conservative and say 900. That is 450% of the Invictus class. Able to fire the missiles. The bigger the Salvo the better the chance of surviving. This ship also carries the ability to survive its own offensive punch. Unlike the Invictus.

Each LAC carries a full Katana CM/Viper chase tube array. Able to coordinate with the Mainship sensors and defend against incoming attacks.

In Larger fleets, Invictus can fire 200 times 50 10,000 missiles in full control. This Whitehaven class can fire fully controlled Salvo's of 45,000 missiles. And with 5,000 LAC defend against that many missiles as well.

50 Invictus could fire 'dumb uncontrolled' 450,000 plus missiles. But then 50 Whitehaven's could fire 180,000 missiles but we all know that dumb fired missiles are quite dumb.

50 Whitehaven could be fired at all engagement by 50 Invictus and never be hit. While 50 Invictus would be defending against 900 Apollo controlled missiles each. Even with 100 being Apollo and 200 being EW, that leaves 600 Attacking missiles each ship each salvo.

Now the 50 Invictus can add 50 CLAC but then 100 Whitehaven's can make the whole state of affairs even more lopsided. Twice the LAC and 900% of the missiles.

Whitehaven's, and Highlander 282's are the Answer to Pod layer CLAC combat.
________________________________________
Just don't ask what is in the protein bars.
Top
Re: New Pod layer new CLAC new LAC
Post by munroburton   » Wed Jun 22, 2016 12:37 pm

munroburton
Admiral

Posts: 2373
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:16 am
Location: Scotland

*sits back and grabs popcorn*
Top
Re: New Pod layer new CLAC new LAC
Post by Potato   » Wed Jun 22, 2016 12:45 pm

Potato
Captain of the List

Posts: 478
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 9:27 pm

Image
Top
Re: New Pod layer new CLAC new LAC
Post by The E   » Wed Jun 22, 2016 12:56 pm

The E
Admiral

Posts: 2700
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 1:28 pm
Location: Meerbusch, Germany

Image
Top
Re: New Pod layer new CLAC new LAC
Post by Vince   » Wed Jun 22, 2016 1:47 pm

Vince
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:43 pm

munroburton wrote:*sits back and grabs popcorn*

Enjoy.
Image
-------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes.
Top
Re: New Pod layer new CLAC new LAC
Post by MuonNeutrino   » Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:12 pm

MuonNeutrino
Commander

Posts: 167
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:40 pm

A very smart person wrote:That is not only not right, it is not even wrong.

Or if you prefer the alternate version:
A very smart person wrote:What you said was so confused that one could not tell whether it was nonsense or not.
_______________________________________________________
MuonNeutrino
Astronomer, teacher, gamer, and procrastinator extraordinaire
Top
Re: New Pod layer new CLAC new LAC
Post by darrell   » Wed Jun 22, 2016 4:47 pm

darrell
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1390
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:57 am

Lord Skimper wrote:Given the whole disperia of Pod layer SD and CLAC fragile as a freighter and LAC being Tough as nails and Pods total offense and no defense. Let's redesign and change everything.

A Tough as SD(P) mothership. Made larger, Armoured with dual chase launch bays one at each end. Dual LAC Pod bays hollow, but with a cylindrical core and central structural section, with all the important stuff, bottles, etc...

Call it the Whitehaven Class.

The Ships should have Energy base broadsides with modern upgraded Lasers, of a variety of sizes, DD through to SD, offering an up-close Energy anti ship weapon load and medium range anti missile duty. Lots of CM's lots more than any other ship 100+ per broadside, and SD PD clusters. Two Keyhole II/III per broadside focused on long range sensors with a focus on Anti missile defense.

In "end tube" chase launched bays, two three four heavily armoured bay doors launching the LAC Highlander 282, Pod LAC. Each craft carrying 2 Apollo Mk23 pods in each broadside. 3 LAC lasers optimised for Anti ship/missile duties and Katana chase CM/Viper launchers and PD clusters. Each capable of controlling the Apollo missile and clustered Mk23 missiles. With target relay information from the main ship. Telemetry for 1/2/3/4 pods of missiles per salvo.

With 100 such LAC Pods 50 per cavity of the LAC Pod layer main ship. Think of a large rotatory LAC launch system similar to the Japanese underground car parking parkades. see youtube if you don't know. The whole inner system in the cavity can reload the LAC at key points, pulling crew off into the ship proper and having repair bays for damaged ships etc...

This makes a ship with much more survivability and much bigger fully controlled Missile salvos. instead on an Invictus with 200 Apollo controlled missile salvos. You end up with a Whitehaven class Ship firing Apollo Salvos of 900/1800/2700/3600 missiles. let's be conservative and say 900. That is 450% of the Invictus class. Able to fire the missiles. The bigger the Salvo the better the chance of surviving. This ship also carries the ability to survive its own offensive punch. Unlike the Invictus.

Each LAC carries a full Katana CM/Viper chase tube array. Able to coordinate with the Mainship sensors and defend against incoming attacks.

In Larger fleets, Invictus can fire 200 times 50 10,000 missiles in full control. This Whitehaven class can fire fully controlled Salvo's of 45,000 missiles. And with 5,000 LAC defend against that many missiles as well.

50 Invictus could fire 'dumb uncontrolled' 450,000 plus missiles. But then 50 Whitehaven's could fire 180,000 missiles but we all know that dumb fired missiles are quite dumb.

50 Whitehaven could be fired at all engagement by 50 Invictus and never be hit. While 50 Invictus would be defending against 900 Apollo controlled missiles each. Even with 100 being Apollo and 200 being EW, that leaves 600 Attacking missiles each ship each salvo.

Now the 50 Invictus can add 50 CLAC but then 100 Whitehaven's can make the whole state of affairs even more lopsided. Twice the LAC and 900% of the missiles.

Whitehaven's, and Highlander 282's are the Answer to Pod layer CLAC combat.


The problem is with survivability. An invictis can take up to 200 hits and still remain partially effective.

50 hits will mission kill most CLAC's 100 hits will turn a CLAC into dust or mission kill your whitehaven class. (and hammish alaxander would be screaming a bloody murder if anyone wanted to name such an abortion after him!)

normal combat doctrine is to put the CLAC's behind the SDP's so that they are more protested.

the POD/CLAC hybrid would force your CLAC's out in front where they are more vunlerable to be killed, plus ammunition supply would be even more limited than on a normal podlayer.
<><><><><><><><><><><><>
Logic: an organized way to go wrong, with confidence.
Top
Re: New Pod layer new CLAC new LAC
Post by Jonathan_S   » Wed Jun 22, 2016 9:09 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8749
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

MuonNeutrino wrote:
A very smart person wrote:That is not only not right, it is not even wrong.

Or if you prefer the alternate version:
A very smart person wrote:What you said was so confused that one could not tell whether it was nonsense or not.

This, very much this.

Also this monstrosity is either a TARDIS ship, bigger on the inside, or else it's got to be in excess of 20 mtons to cram that mismatched heap of hardware in. But hey if you're throwing pods out the front you don't want acceleration of your run them over ;)
Top
Re: New Pod layer new CLAC new LAC
Post by Kytheros   » Wed Jun 22, 2016 9:09 pm

Kytheros
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1407
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:34 pm

...
No. Just no.

Whitehaven would shoot you for trying to name this after him. And there isn't a courtmartial that would convict him.




While there has been word from RFC about a more heavily armored CLAC to reload LACs mid-combat, and speculation about what its design might be like ... this ... abomination is not it.



The concept of hybrid carrier/gunship design does not work in the technological confines of the Honorverse. At least, not until you're damned huge - maybe something around Lenny Det sized or bigger, since the graser spider torps are huge. Or a particularly large Fort.
The other alternative would be making small craft - the size of stingships, pinnaces or assault shuttles - viable combat platforms against actual ships. Honorverse technology does not currently allow for that to happen; although I suppose that you might, in theory, be able to make something that size a viable anti-missile laser platform.
Top
Re: New Pod layer new CLAC new LAC
Post by saber964   » Wed Jun 22, 2016 9:44 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

Lord Skimper wrote:Given the whole disperia of Pod layer SD and CLAC fragile as a freighter and LAC being Tough as nails and Pods total offense and no defense. Let's redesign and change everything.

A Tough as SD(P) mothership. Made larger, Armoured with dual chase launch bays one at each end. Dual LAC Pod bays hollow, but with a cylindrical core and central structural section, with all the important stuff, bottles, etc...

Call it the Whitehaven Class.

The Ships should have Energy base broadsides with modern upgraded Lasers, of a variety of sizes, DD through to SD, offering an up-close Energy anti ship weapon load and medium range anti missile duty. Lots of CM's lots more than any other ship 100+ per broadside, and SD PD clusters. Two Keyhole II/III per broadside focused on long range sensors with a focus on Anti missile defense.

In "end tube" chase launched bays, two three four heavily armoured bay doors launching the LAC Highlander 282, Pod LAC. Each craft carrying 2 Apollo Mk23 pods in each broadside. 3 LAC lasers optimised for Anti ship/missile duties and Katana chase CM/Viper launchers and PD clusters. Each capable of controlling the Apollo missile and clustered Mk23 missiles. With target relay information from the main ship. Telemetry for 1/2/3/4 pods of missiles per salvo.

With 100 such LAC Pods 50 per cavity of the LAC Pod layer main ship. Think of a large rotatory LAC launch system similar to the Japanese underground car parking parkades. see youtube if you don't know. The whole inner system in the cavity can reload the LAC at key points, pulling crew off into the ship proper and having repair bays for damaged ships etc...

This makes a ship with much more survivability and much bigger fully controlled Missile salvos. instead on an Invictus with 200 Apollo controlled missile salvos. You end up with a Whitehaven class Ship firing Apollo Salvos of 900/1800/2700/3600 missiles. let's be conservative and say 900. That is 450% of the Invictus class. Able to fire the missiles. The bigger the Salvo the better the chance of surviving. This ship also carries the ability to survive its own offensive punch. Unlike the Invictus.

Each LAC carries a full Katana CM/Viper chase tube array. Able to coordinate with the Mainship sensors and defend against incoming attacks.

In Larger fleets, Invictus can fire 200 times 50 10,000 missiles in full control. This Whitehaven class can fire fully controlled Salvo's of 45,000 missiles. And with 5,000 LAC defend against that many missiles as well.

50 Invictus could fire 'dumb uncontrolled' 450,000 plus missiles. But then 50 Whitehaven's could fire 180,000 missiles but we all know that dumb fired missiles are quite dumb.

50 Whitehaven could be fired at all engagement by 50 Invictus and never be hit. While 50 Invictus would be defending against 900 Apollo controlled missiles each. Even with 100 being Apollo and 200 being EW, that leaves 600 Attacking missiles each ship each salvo.

Now the 50 Invictus can add 50 CLAC but then 100 Whitehaven's can make the whole state of affairs even more lopsided. Twice the LAC and 900% of the missiles.

Whitehaven's, and Highlander 282's are the Answer to Pod layer CLAC combat.



I am only going to say this once. Lord Skimper are you a &^&*&($&& #&&$**^$# ^#^&& moron with a brain the size of a mazon(FYI a sub-atomic particle). That concept of yours has about as much chance of being practical or even remotely feasible or successful as I do of being able to flap my arms and fly to OZ by way of Barsoom with stops in Never-Never land and Cemmiria.
Top

Return to Honorverse