Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests

Control Missile for shipboard launched missiles

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Control Missile for shipboard launched missiles
Post by Vince   » Thu Apr 16, 2015 3:36 pm

Vince
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:43 pm

Jonathan_S wrote:
munroburton wrote:
I think the improved performance of BCs at Monica might be to do with them starting at a much lower range - thus not allowing Terekhov's Mk16s to get full usage out of their drives and increasing the interception window for the Monicans.

It may also indicate that even something like the Republic of Monica Navy has personnel better trained than the SLN. Certainly, the Monican Commodore seemed to be considered the best flag officer in that navy - he'd have first choice of tactical personnel.

But the largest shift of all was the Battle of New Tuscany with the capture of a whole bunch of SLN battlecruisers, two of which were sent back to Manticore for ONI to pick apart, with 10th Fleet doing some of the initial analysis. They were able to map the SLN's EW and ECM systems inside-out, forwards and backwards and any other combination of directions you'd care to name. Subsequently, the RMN was able to program their missiles to maximise their effects against SLN hardware and programming.

At Monica, it was the RMN's first time up against those systems in such quality and quantity, with at least some competence and training behind them.

Remember what Rafe Cardones pulled off when he realised Saladin's EW systems were resetting to the same start point in 2nd Yeltsin? Well, this is several magnitudes worse than that. You don't need to imagine what he'd be able to do after a few weeks running around inside the BC playing with its tactical systems because that's what happened in every post-New Tuscany engagement.

Also, while the Indefatigable-class BC's at Monica were a generation older than the SLN's newest (Nevada-class), they'd just gotten a fairly extensive refit.

Supposedly the reason was to disguise the ships' origins. But while the refit was carried out in Monica yards, it was heavily assisted by Technodyne reps provided as part of the MAlign's plot. To make them more effective in that role it's not implausible that those BCs got upgrades to make their point defense much more effective than FF standard - even though they lack the Halo of the newer Nevadas.


After all we know from the attack on Torch that the software used to drive the CMs and PDLCs was so bad that a group of ex-State Sec ship thugs were able to get major improvements just from effectively doing a bit of cut & paste from pre-ceasefire Havenite PD software -- and that's before you touch hardware.


Between that and the points you raised, it certainly seems conceivable that Monica represents a defensive anomaly; compared to what we'd expect to see out of SLN forces in the near-term.

And those Technodyne tech-reps were both on-board and actually operating tactical systems of the three BCs that attacked Terekhov's squadron.
-------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes.
Top
Re: Control Missile for shipboard launched missiles
Post by wastedfly   » Fri Apr 17, 2015 1:18 pm

wastedfly
Commodore

Posts: 832
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:23 am

Should be noted:

In Ashes of Victory at Elric:

3 Peep Capitol missiles got through the defenses and killed 1/3 of crew and Mission Killed a BC. Also in same book a couple of chapters later said that even BC's can only withstand a handful of Capitol missile hits whereas an SD can take several hundred. Also in same book says BC can take ~MANY(hundred) light missiles from say, LAC's(DD grade)

Can ya tell, I just read AoV? ;)
Top
Re: Control Missile for shipboard launched missiles
Post by Rakhmamort   » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:12 pm

Rakhmamort
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 3:23 am

crewdude48 wrote:That is what I said. Keyhole is not a control missile.


Which just means FTL receivers can easily be incorporated in the control missile. Which means better accuracy for the control missile's brood compared to your light speed control links.

You still seemed to have missed the part of the Pearl where David Weber said "The Rolands were designed to fit a very specific tactical and strategic niche. They were also very deliberately designed not to fit other tactical and strategic niches." They very specifically DO NOT WANT a Roland to be able to take on a half squadron of BCs by it self.


Even if you equip Rolands with control missiles, they aren't going to be going toe to toe with BC squadrons. Once their magazine is expended, that is it. What the control missile is going to do is to deter the enemy from attacking lone DDs because the DD can destroy some of them and run away instead of the DD simply running away or DD wasting its entire magazine and doing minimal damage before running away.
Top
Re: Control Missile for shipboard launched missiles
Post by SharkHunter   » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:20 pm

SharkHunter
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1608
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:53 pm
Location: Independence, Missouri

Rakhmamort wrote:
crewdude48 wrote:That is what I said. Keyhole is not a control missile.


Which just means FTL receivers can easily be incorporated in the control missile. Which means better accuracy for the control missile's brood compared to your light speed control links.

You still seemed to have missed the part of the Pearl where David Weber said "The Rolands were designed to fit a very specific tactical and strategic niche. They were also very deliberately designed not to fit other tactical and strategic niches." They very specifically DO NOT WANT a Roland to be able to take on a half squadron of BCs by it self.


Even if you equip Rolands with control missiles, they aren't going to be going toe to toe with BC squadrons. Once their magazine is expended, that is it. What the control missile is going to do is to deter the enemy from attacking lone DDs because the DD can destroy some of them and run away instead of the DD simply running away or DD wasting its entire magazine and doing minimal damage before running away.
What we're talking about isn't a Roland trying to go toe-to-toe with a squadron of BC's we're talking about a Roland plus perhaps an augment from a merchie dumping pods being able to keep those BC's from closing on a convoy long enough for the convoy to escape, which is a defensive no-can-do otherwise.
---------------------
All my posts are YMMV, IMHO, and welcoming polite discussion, extension, and rebuttal. This is the HonorVerse, after all
Top
Re: Control Missile for shipboard launched missiles
Post by Rakhmamort   » Tue Apr 21, 2015 3:40 am

Rakhmamort
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 3:23 am

SharkHunter wrote: What we're talking about isn't a Roland trying to go toe-to-toe with a squadron of BC's we're talking about a Roland plus perhaps an augment from a merchie dumping pods being able to keep those BC's from closing on a convoy long enough for the convoy to escape, which is a defensive no-can-do otherwise.


Were we? If that's the case, then control missiles would still give the ROland a hell of a lot of punch. Instead of being able to send out only 36 missiles max per salvo, with control missiles and a cargo ship full of pods, it can totally wipe out a squadron or two of BCs by sending 360 missile sized salvos at them.

No matter how you look at it, if you have a limited number of control links which isn't enough to swamp the enemy's defenses you are f@cked. One option of increasing your salvo size is to use control missiles. That's what made it possible for a 12 cruisers to take on SDs in spindle.
Top
Re: Control Missile for shipboard launched missiles
Post by munroburton   » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:28 am

munroburton
Admiral

Posts: 2368
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:16 am
Location: Scotland

Rakhmamort wrote:Even if you equip Rolands with control missiles, they aren't going to be going toe to toe with BC squadrons. Once their magazine is expended, that is it. What the control missile is going to do is to deter the enemy from attacking lone DDs because the DD can destroy some of them and run away instead of the DD simply running away or DD wasting its entire magazine and doing minimal damage before running away.


The way deterrence works requires that the enemy be aware of your potential threat. In which case there are plenty of other threats they're more afraid of - ie, SD(P)s, BC(L)s, CA(L)s.

Control missiles available to those would be as effective a force multiplier, which means the SLN are still going to look for the easiest targets. If 'easiest' happens to be throwing enough BCs at a convoy to saturate its one or two escorts' missile magazines, they'll have to do that.

At the end of the analysis, it's not really a victory for the Solarian League if they lose multiple BCs for every bottom-tier convoy they attack. They'll never nail the really critical convoys moving between Trevor's Star and Bolthole, for instance.

The sensible thing for the Roland to do if it is surrounded by squadrons of BCs at extreme range and its magazines are empty is for the Captain to order the crews to abandon ship and then scuttle the vessel. I'd give her a medal when she got back, cos anyone who closes for a beam duel with a DD against multiple BCs is an idiot and might hand the enemy damaged pieces of Manty tech in the process.
Top
Re: Control Missile for shipboard launched missiles
Post by SharkHunter   » Fri Apr 24, 2015 11:03 am

SharkHunter
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1608
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:53 pm
Location: Independence, Missouri

--snipping--
munroburton wrote:The sensible thing for the Roland to do if it is surrounded by squadrons of BCs at extreme range and its magazines are empty is for the Captain to order the crews to abandon ship and then scuttle the vessel. I'd give her a medal when she got back, cos anyone who closes for a beam duel with a DD against multiple BCs is an idiot and might hand the enemy damaged pieces of Manty tech in the process.
For a Roland to be trapped outside the hyper limit is nearly impossible because the Mark-16 has at least twice the range of even a Cataphract-C which is a capital missile. Prepositioning "squadrons" outside the hyper limit only works if they're all "wedge down" and the RMN ship sails blindly right into a small ball where they can't hyper out.

Inside the hyper limit, the Rolands are generally attacking and they're not going to be doing that solo, aka Saltash repeated ad nauseum.

That said, the Roland's vulnerability tends to be when it is forced into a defensive/no retreat fight, such as if it has to defend convoy ships against multiple BC's. Until there's a Keyhole-lite style system up and running, it's range and supply of the Mark 16's that will dictate the outcome of any battle.

That said, by the end of that battle (aka the Roland out of missiles, unable to run, and with enemy BC's still able to close), the DD is going to drop life pods and scuttle. There will be NO remaining RMN tech by the time any MAlign or SLN ships arrive.
---------------------
All my posts are YMMV, IMHO, and welcoming polite discussion, extension, and rebuttal. This is the HonorVerse, after all
Top
Re: Control Missile for shipboard launched missiles
Post by Jonathan_S   » Fri Apr 24, 2015 3:56 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8306
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

SharkHunter wrote:That said, the Roland's vulnerability tends to be when it is forced into a defensive/no retreat fight, such as if it has to defend convoy ships against multiple BC's. Until there's a Keyhole-lite style system up and running, it's range and supply of the Mark 16's that will dictate the outcome of any battle.

That said, by the end of that battle (aka the Roland out of missiles, unable to run, and with enemy BC's still able to close), the DD is going to drop life pods and scuttle. There will be NO remaining RMN tech by the time any MAlign or SLN ships arrive.
Well there's one more trick up the Roland's sleeve that doesn't rely on Mk16s. But it does rely on being able to lure the enemy into a chase.

Like all modern RMN ships the Roland's should have the 2-stage bow/stern wall. Against one or two opponents[1] the Roland should be able to keep it's stern buckler imposed; which means instead of the chasing cruisers/battlecruisers having a marginal energy range advantage (and a hell of a toughness advantage) the Roland instead enjoys almost twice the effective energy range Hammerhead to Hammerhead, or any chasing ship.
That's a nasty surprise.

But doing that in defense of a convoy requires the Roland to charge out to attack, or requires an enemy willing to be lured away from their real targets (the merchies) to chase one of the escorts. And it's only useful against an unsuspecting enemy, otherwise they can just angle off enough to impose a sidewall (or wedge) -- the Roland doesn't have enough of an acceleration advantage to keep itself positioned, out past 500,000 km, for a down the throat shot against a non-cooperative warship.

(And of course pulling this off if the enemy has any significant numbers of missiles left is more or less a non-starter)

------------
[1] More than that and it's too easy for them to spread out and find an angle that's clear of the buckler. Based on the given numbers the buckler seems to generate less than a 1 degree cone that's fully protected; an enemy gets off axis more than that and at least some parts of your ship can be hit without contacting the buckler.
Top
Re: Control Missile for shipboard launched missiles
Post by Rakhmamort   » Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:57 am

Rakhmamort
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 3:23 am

munroburton wrote:The way deterrence works requires that the enemy be aware of your potential threat. In which case there are plenty of other threats they're more afraid of - ie, SD(P)s, BC(L)s, CA(L)s.


It is already written they are going for merchant shipping. With the limited number of capital ships and the threat of the MA with unknown force levels, they aren't going to be sending capital ships escorting merchants around.

Control missiles available to those would be as effective a force multiplier, which means the SLN are still going to look for the easiest targets. If 'easiest' happens to be throwing enough BCs at a convoy to saturate its one or two escorts' missile magazines, they'll have to do that.

At the end of the analysis, it's not really a victory for the Solarian League if they lose multiple BCs for every bottom-tier convoy they attack. They'll never nail the really critical convoys moving between Trevor's Star and Bolthole, for instance.

The sensible thing for the Roland to do if it is surrounded by squadrons of BCs at extreme range and its magazines are empty is for the Captain to order the crews to abandon ship and then scuttle the vessel. I'd give her a medal when she got back, cos anyone who closes for a beam duel with a DD against multiple BCs is an idiot and might hand the enemy damaged pieces of Manty tech in the process.


And with control missiles, they would have blown one of those BC squadrons away and made a hole they can get through.
Top

Return to Honorverse