Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 132 guests

Comedy/Tragedy of Errors: Stupidity in the Honorverse

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Comedy/Tragedy of Errors: Stupidity in the Honorverse
Post by Jonathan_S   » Sun Aug 21, 2016 10:38 am

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8322
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

kzt wrote:Which is in and of itself is interesting. One wonders what exactly can be vetoed and how one can work around that. Assuming that they don't just arrest everyone who votes against a resolution and holds another vote until it "passes by acclamation".

A first guess would be that only a vote on a new law might be subject to that single nation veto.
But the vote to investigate Beowulf wasn't a new law.

But yes, you'd think that since IIRC the vote passed something like 75/25 that at least one of the 25%-ish would have then vetoed it if that was allowed. I could see Beowulf being ineligible to veto a motion on themselves; but it seems inconceivable that not one of the others who voted no cared enough to follow through with a veto (even at the risk of some unofficial retaliation later). So I can only conclude that that vote for some reason wasn't subject to veto. But I don't believe RFC ever clarified exactly what was and wasn't vetoable in the League.
Top
Re: Comedy/Tragedy of Errors: Stupidity in the Honorverse
Post by Fox2!   » Sun Aug 21, 2016 10:35 pm

Fox2!
Commodore

Posts: 922
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 1:34 am
Location: Huntsville, AL

GofyTomcat1 wrote:Honor for never bringing a ship home in one piece
:mrgreen:



Didn't she bring Hawkwing home in one piece?

Sorry if I took out a "quote" too many.
Top
Re: Comedy/Tragedy of Errors: Stupidity in the Honorverse
Post by Greentea   » Sun Aug 21, 2016 11:47 pm

Greentea
Commander

Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:25 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

bkwormlisa wrote:One of the stupidest (and most annoying things) in my opinion was Queen Elizabeth canceling the summit and resuming the war.
“And what happened on Torch, Your Majesty?” Mourncreek said.

“They invited us – me – to a summit meeting. I don’t think they actually expected me to accept. I think it was essentially planned as yet another of their damned diplomatic lies. They probably intended to publish the correspondence of their invitation and my refusal as proof that they’re the ‘reasonable party’ in this war. It would have bolstered their claim that they’ve been telling the truth about our diplomatic correspondence from the beginning.

“But then I accepted their invitation, and we nominated Torch for the site and invited Erewhon to provide security, with the possibility of repairing the damage to our relations with the Erewhonese. They hadn’t counted on that. And even though they’d probably never expected to sit down and negotiate seriously, they found themselves in a position where they might actually have to do that. Where it was even possible we’d sound like the voice of reason. So they decided to avoid the entire problem by killing Berry and Ruth – after all, what’s the death of two more teenaged girls to bastards like Peeps? For that matter, if the girls’ schedule hadn’t slipped, they probably would have killed Thandi Palane and decapitated the Torch military, as well. Obviously, the confusion and chaos which would have resulted would have made Torch completely impossible as a conference site. And even if it hadn’t, they could always point to their concern about security issues and the safety of their precious President Pritchart as reasons they couldn’t possibly meet with me there. After, of course, sending me their lying condolences for my niece’s death – just like Saint-Just did after he murdered Uncle Anson and Cal!”

....
....
....

“Very well.” Elizabeth surveyed her ministers one more time, then nodded sharply, decisively.

“Willie, I’m going to draft a note to Pritchart. It’s not going to be pretty. I’m going to officially and publicly denounce her actions and notify her that I have no intention of meeting anywhere with someone who uses assassination as a routine tool. And I’m also going to notify her that we intend to resume active military operations immediately.”


Basically, she said "Pritchart tried to murder my niece because she wants to not have the summit she proposed. Because she thinks we'll get more benefit from it than she will. So I'll give her exactly what she wants and cancel it myself!"

And not a single one of her advisors pointed out that she was doing what she thought Pritchart wanted. WTF?


Several advisers, including Honor, did point that out. Haven had very little to gain from the attempted assassination on Torch. However, the assassination of the Manticoran ambassador to the SL, carried out by a member of Haven's staff with financial trails pointing back to Haven helped Elizabeth reach her conclusion. Elizabeth has also experience several assassinations against herself or those she love carried out by Haven through agents. Elizabeth couldn't quite believe that the leopard could change its spots. The MAlign played on that. They played Elizabeth perfectly.
Cup of tea? Yes, please.
Top
Re: Comedy/Tragedy of Errors: Stupidity in the Honorverse
Post by Rincewind   » Tue Aug 23, 2016 8:26 pm

Rincewind
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 277
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 1:22 pm

fallsfromtrees wrote:
saber964 wrote:Anyone who goes up against Honor in personal or professional way. They have a tendency to wind up dead or disgraced.

Denver Summervale dead
Pavel Young dead
Stephen Young disgraced
Georgia Young disgraced and running fast and far
Michael Janvier disgraced
Edward Janacek disgraced and dead
Reginald Houseman disgraced
Marisa Turner disgraced
Elaine Descroix disgraced
William Fitzclarence dead
Samuel Muller dead

You could probably add Dimitri Young too.

Actually going up against Honor professionally is not necessarily a ticket to disgrace or death. off the top of my head
Thomas Theisman
Warner Caslet
Alfredo Yu
(and to roseandheather's dismay) Javier Giscard (although he did end up dead)

It really appears to be in the nature of personal attacks on Honor are a good way to professional suicide.


Actually Honor never went up against Alfredo Yu. She was not present for the 1st Battle of Yeltsin Star & Alfredo Yu had already lost Thunder of God to Sword Simmons who was captaining it when Honor went up against it. So Honor & Alfredo never faced each other.
Top
Re: Comedy/Tragedy of Errors: Stupidity in the Honorverse
Post by bkwormlisa   » Wed Aug 24, 2016 7:46 am

bkwormlisa
Commander

Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 5:43 pm

Greentea wrote:
bkwormlisa wrote:One of the stupidest (and most annoying things) in my opinion was Queen Elizabeth canceling the summit and resuming the war.

Basically, she said "Pritchart tried to murder my niece because she wants to not have the summit she proposed. Because she thinks we'll get more benefit from it than she will. So I'll give her exactly what she wants and cancel it myself!"

And not a single one of her advisors pointed out that she was doing what she thought Pritchart wanted. WTF?


Several advisers, including Honor, did point that out. Haven had very little to gain from the attempted assassination on Torch. However, the assassination of the Manticoran ambassador to the SL, carried out by a member of Haven's staff with financial trails pointing back to Haven helped Elizabeth reach her conclusion. Elizabeth has also experience several assassinations against herself or those she love carried out by Haven through agents. Elizabeth couldn't quite believe that the leopard could change its spots. The MAlign played on that. They played Elizabeth perfectly.

I agree that several of them tried to point out that it could have been someone other than Haven and Elizabeth refused to listen. But even once she decided it was Haven, she also decided that Haven had done it to make her cancel the summit, and so she cancelled the summit. She made a semi-rational (if prejudiced) conclusion, but then reacted to it in a totally irrational way by doing what she thought they wanted her to do. That's what doesn't make sense to me. Since she thought Pritchart wanted her to cancel the summit, she ought to have insisted on having it as soon as she could, just to spite them.
Top

Return to Honorverse