Or, you know, as part of his job as First Space Lord he had routine disucssion with Givens and Caparelli with covered the current plans should the RMN be ordered to resume operations.Star Knight wrote:I disagree about the idea of Caparelli/Givens being sidelined.
Book wise, however, we don't get to be the fly on the wall in the pit with Givens and Caparelli like we did in AoV (Ashes of Victory) coming up with the strategies that they are giving to White Haven, etc. to keep the SEM from losing the war.
We don’t need to be a fly on their wall to see they were not involved. The hole Torch business happened and the Queen was demanding action during a cabinet meeting. Hamish brought up Sanskrit, discussed it with the Queen and his brother and got the order to get things going.
That’s it and that’s highly irregular. He should have gone straight to Caparelli and Grievens when the Queen was demanding action, not selling here 6 tmonths old battle plans.
This is on him.
Just because White Haven was able to discuss plans without going back and consulting doesn't mean that the plan had literally be sitting on a shelf, discussed, for 6 months; nor that he ordered it put in operation without listening to anybody. (I'm sure at least it was routinely updated based on forces available and any intel coming out of Haven space)
White Haven and the Admiralty might suffered from a bit of lock-in and sticking with the plan they had rather that going back and doing a clean-sheet approach. But lack of mention of Caparelli does not mean that the plan White Haven presented the Queen didn't represent their collective current best approach as of their last (weekly?) update and planning meeting. (Flawed as it might have turned out to be)