Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 158 guests

Best use of the Agamemnons (BC(P))--and other Ships

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Best use of the Agamemnons (BC(P))--and other Ships
Post by JeffEngel   » Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:37 am

JeffEngel
Admiral

Posts: 2074
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:06 pm

Hutch wrote:
JeffEngel wrote:Two dozen yards, about 80% FF and 20% BF (alternatively: 80% BC on down, 20% able to do wallers too). So about 5 BF and about 19 FF.

Punching out all the FF complexes may be time-consuming and would represent a wave of attacks that may be politically awkward, if the GA is supposed to be the plucky defenders against Solarian aggression.

But any one of them would be a fairly easy target, presumably they are all known and no trouble to find, so the time-consuming part of it is livable.


Jeff, I can't see the time-consuming part. Given six BatSqd with support elements should be about to punchout the 18-19 sites within 3-4 months, IMHO.

Yeah, that probably comes down to different thresholds for "time-consuming". Faster and/or with fewer ships would be nicer. I don't think the time and shipping commitment is anything approaching a deal-breaker either.

Politically, the GA may not have to punch out ones that are not in fact producing more FF units (Kingsford will have a hard time getting crews into deathtraps if FF ships go up like popcorn as much as BF ones have); the GA can destroy them with all due care and more to preventing loss of life while underlining their technical advantages (just like the Cutworm attacks on Haven that way) to preserve the impressions of both special care for lives and overwhelming qualitative advantage; and that sort of example may make other such yard complexes just opt out of working: if you can avoid being blown up by simply building freighters instead, and freighters are in high demand... Frontier Fleet can just get in line.


Concur; albeit that converting a Military yard to civilan purposes may not be all that simple--albeit I will plead ignorance on that score.

I doubt it'd be difficult or expensive. What it would be is a "waste" of resources that might otherwise be going into warship construction, which is practical only at a smaller number of more expensive facilities. But if you really, really don't want to be producing those units and putting a bulls-eye on yourself, who cares?

Another dodge may be for those yards to take orders from SDF's instead. They're hardly failing to satisfy the needs of the Solarian League that way (*snicker*), and they may still avoid GA wrath in that case. And SDF's are likely to have excellent reason to expand. It's another instance of League assets morphing into freer private ones or local ones, much like Roman assets ceasing to be Roman without going up in smoke when the Empire shrunk out of western Europe.
I do think that we will be seeing the GA make a visible effort to differentiate between blowing up Solarian League assets versus Planetary System assets. Oh, they may disable or hold the frieghters until the political matters are sorted out and put an embargo on building new ships, but only until the "political situation brought on by the reckless and criminal actions of the Mandarins are resolved by your planetary authorities." (I.e., play nice with us and we have no interest in hurting your economy and indeed would love to trade with you).

Indeed. The whole idea is simply (!) to undo the League, not destroy anything otherwise or tick off any other institution, individual, or government. That latter isn't going to be totally avoidable, of course, but it can be minimized and delicate suggestions for how to get oneself out of the crosshairs can be conveyed.

Hitting the smaller number of BF yards would make for individually scarier attacks, again potentially troubling the political aims, but again it'd be easy to frame that as doing the most to protect lives and defend the GA worlds, only at some remove. And heck - they can remind people that wallers those yards would build would be deathtraps anyway, so they're doing SLN personnel a favor by destroying the coffin-building facilities.


Nice. And I agree, taking out the BF yards is high on the GA list of 'things to do'. We only differ in that I think the FF yards are nearly equal priority.

Maybe. Certainly more dangerous things can be done with yards producing units that will be used soon, that can be used effectively, and will get more competent leadership.

On the other hand, I'm not too impressed with how well Frontier Fleet will do and or by how much good the yard capacity and future units will do them, and I am impressed with the political risks of the kind of rampage hitting 19+ minor yards will appear to be, when those yards aren't even building the classically frightening sorts of units. An attacker targeting all your police training facilities would not look like someone simply defending themselves, and Frontier Fleet may look too much like space cops to the Solly in the street to avoid that impression.

It will be the political aspects that follow the military action that will be the big decider.

IMHO as always. YMMV.

Yep yep. Some of those political aspects can be seen ahead of time though, and can be cause for avoiding or altering some of the military actions. The political element of this war is a lot more pronounced than it is in many others: outright military victory over the League isn't on the table, since it is just so large compared to the GA, but disintegrating the League - convincing its parts to cease to be a whole - is entirely doable. And while the GA cannot occupy and control the League for the outright military win, it can blow up pretty much whatever it has to - so long as that's consistent with the political aim.
Top
Re: Best use of the Agamemnons (BC(P))--and other Ships
Post by fester   » Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:56 am

fester
Captain of the List

Posts: 680
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:33 pm

SWM wrote:So Sharkhunter and Hutch--you are suggesting that the League has decided that, since it is already jumping into an undeclared war with Manticore, no one in the galaxy will notice or complain if the League also starts invading neutral nations while they're at it? The League doesn't care what their own people will think of this, let alone the rest of the galaxy?


Neutral rights only matter if the neutral is strong enough to make them matter. Look at the British blockade of Germany in WWI. Britain's deplayable naval power was superior to the USN, but they worked very hard to keep the US at no more than moderately annoyed at the blatant flouting of the previously accepted rules of blockade. If the Brits pissed off the US enough about the blockade, the US could retaliate (most easily by making any and all sales pure cash and carry in the US, escalating to selling nothing to no one, escalating to a couple of battleships escorting a large convoy to Copenhagen or Amersterdam....) The Dutch and Danes did not have the ability to make the RN care about what they thought of the blockade.

In this scenario, who are the major neutral powers that could hurt the Solarian League's war goals? The Andermanis? So the SLN avoids pissing on Andermani interests... the Judean League --- who the hell are they? A little piss pot 4th tier system that was previously allied to Manticore, what the fuck can they do to SLN interests --- nothing....

The entire strategy of Kingsford as developped by the MA penetration agent is to weaken the economies of the Haven Sector by hitting the weakpoints of their trading systems. 4th tier neutrals in the Haven Sector are a weak point... therefore they are a logical target.
Top
Re: Best use of the Agamemnons (BC(P))--and other Ships
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Wed Dec 31, 2014 2:22 pm

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1958
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

fester wrote:
SWM wrote:So Sharkhunter and Hutch--you are suggesting that the League has decided that, since it is already jumping into an undeclared war with Manticore, no one in the galaxy will notice or complain if the League also starts invading neutral nations while they're at it? The League doesn't care what their own people will think of this, let alone the rest of the galaxy?


Neutral rights only matter if the neutral is strong enough to make them matter. Look at the British blockade of Germany in WWI. Britain's deplayable naval power was superior to the USN, but they worked very hard to keep the US at no more than moderately annoyed at the blatant flouting of the previously accepted rules of blockade. If the Brits pissed off the US enough about the blockade, the US could retaliate (most easily by making any and all sales pure cash and carry in the US, escalating to selling nothing to no one, escalating to a couple of battleships escorting a large convoy to Copenhagen or Amersterdam....) The Dutch and Danes did not have the ability to make the RN care about what they thought of the blockade.

In this scenario, who are the major neutral powers that could hurt the Solarian League's war goals? The Andermanis? So the SLN avoids pissing on Andermani interests... the Judean League --- who the hell are they? A little piss pot 4th tier system that was previously allied to Manticore, what the fuck can they do to SLN interests --- nothing....

The entire strategy of Kingsford as developped by the MA penetration agent is to weaken the economies of the Haven Sector by hitting the weakpoints of their trading systems. 4th tier neutrals in the Haven Sector are a weak point... therefore they are a logical target.

What about a kind of half way strategy. Take out 3-4 FF base (closest to the GA), and perhaps the nearest BF shipyard as well. Then send off courier ships with full tapes of the action to the other bases and sector governors (except those in Sol system), with a note that says "We can do this to you anytime we want. Continue to take orders from Terra, and we will be forced to."
Since you are going to get warlords anyway, encourage FF to break up into the various sectors. Take away most of the FF from Kingsford control, and his raiding strategy falls flat.
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top
Re: Best use of the Agamemnons (BC(P))--and other Ships
Post by George J. Smith   » Wed Dec 31, 2014 2:25 pm

George J. Smith
Commodore

Posts: 873
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:48 am
Location: Ross-on-Wye UK

JeffEngel wrote:[Hitting the smaller number of BF yards would make for individually scarier attacks, again potentially troubling the political aims, but again it'd be easy to frame that as doing the most to protect lives and defend the GA worlds, only at some remove. And heck - they can remind people that wallers those yards would build would be deathtraps anyway, so they're doing SLN personnel a favor by destroying the coffin-building facilities.


Capitol ships are seen as offensive weapons rather than defensive weapons, so punching out the capitol ships construction facilities might not be the political problem it appears, the ability of systems to build/obtain ships with which to defend themselves against their peer groups would be a plus as the League breaks up.
.
T&R
GJS

A man should live forever, or die in the attempt
Spider Robinson Callahan's Crosstime Saloon (1977) A voice is heard in Ramah
Top
Re: Best use of the Agamemnons (BC(P))--and other Ships
Post by Brigade XO   » Wed Dec 31, 2014 5:26 pm

Brigade XO
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3115
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: KY

You will recall that the ships delivered to Monica were comming from Technodyne who was supposed to be decommissioning and scrapping the BCs. I took from part of that tale that it was also Techondyne that was building the replacements for the SLN. These were NOT ships being scrapped out of the Reserve fleet, they were being retired and scrapped.

So why was the SLN scrapping them? Ok, there was a program with newer/better BCs and those new ships were replacing them. So who was building the new ships? Technodyne.

Where were they building the new ships? I very much doubt that they were being built at yards out in the Verge.

So, where does Technodyne have production facilities for warships other than Yildin? Don't think we have been told. IF- a very big if- they do have yards capable of building new BC's from scratch somewhere out beyond the Core or at Yilden, then those would be really good places for the GA to strike as far as limiting the building of newer and presumabley more effective BC and smaller ships.

Hit the MILITARY production yards out in the Verge that are or have been building ships for the SLN. At the same time, hit the FF logistic and repair bases. That strikes directly at a major soruce of repair and replacement for the types of ships that would be the best for both commerce raiding and to cut the SLN off from forward basing closest to the GA. You kill the ships even if you don't also kill the crews and you remove logistic links that would provide Kingsford places to support his raiders.

The GA doesn't yet know that the SLN is talking about commerce raiding BUT they do know that it has been FF that has kept the boot heals on the planets under the control of OFS and it's "allied" partners in various Protectorate and similar systems. Remove that power base (by taking away the FF ships and then their potential logistic sources and you make it much easier to have systems both break away from OFS and the OFS/FF supported regimes. That kills both the ability of FF to reach to the GA and to put down systems which rise agains whomever is being supported by OFS and FF.

Even if you leave any purely civilian yards (civilian/commercial construction only) alone in the same systems as FF centered military yards, you cripple the FF- and so BF- from being able to repair or replace ships.
Top
Re: Best use of the Agamemnons (BC(P))--and other Ships
Post by SharkHunter   » Wed Dec 31, 2014 5:58 pm

SharkHunter
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1608
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:53 pm
Location: Independence, Missouri

Brigade XO wrote:You will recall that the ships delivered to Monica were comming from Technodyne who was supposed to be decommissioning and scrapping the BCs. I took from part of that tale that it was also Techondyne that was building the replacements for the SLN. These were NOT ships being scrapped out of the Reserve fleet, they were being retired and scrapped.

So why was the SLN scrapping them? Ok, there was a program with newer/better BCs and those new ships were replacing them. So who was building the new ships? Technodyne.

Where were they building the new ships? I very much doubt that they were being built at yards out in the Verge.

So, where does Technodyne have production facilities for warships other than Yildin? Don't think we have been told. IF- a very big if- they do have yards capable of building new BC's from scratch somewhere out beyond the Core or at Yilden, then those would be really good places for the GA to strike as far as limiting the building of newer and presumabley more effective BC and smaller ships.

Hit the MILITARY production yards out in the Verge that are or have been building ships for the SLN. At the same time, hit the FF logistic and repair bases. That strikes directly at a major soruce of repair and replacement for the types of ships that would be the best for both commerce raiding and to cut the SLN off from forward basing closest to the GA. You kill the ships even if you don't also kill the crews and you remove logistic links that would provide Kingsford places to support his raiders.

The GA doesn't yet know that the SLN is talking about commerce raiding BUT they do know that it has been FF that has kept the boot heals on the planets under the control of OFS and it's "allied" partners in various Protectorate and similar systems. Remove that power base (by taking away the FF ships and then their potential logistic sources and you make it much easier to have systems both break away from OFS and the OFS/FF supported regimes. That kills both the ability of FF to reach to the GA and to put down systems which rise against whomever is being supported by OFS and FF.

Even if you leave any purely civilian yards (civilian / commercial construction only) alone in the same systems as FF centered military yards, you cripple the FF- and so BF- from being able to repair or replace ships.
Considering that this thread is about the Agamemmenons... especially if the GA doesn't even have to use the SD-P(s) to do the damage. Someone like Terekhov popping with a strike force, in at the best approach angle and saying "Remember Monica? y'all have two T-Hours to abandon the fleet base. Any offensive moves in our direction, buh bye to both ships and the base. Starting now..."
---------------------
All my posts are YMMV, IMHO, and welcoming polite discussion, extension, and rebuttal. This is the HonorVerse, after all
Top
Re: Best use of the Agamemnons (BC(P))--and other Ships
Post by Draken   » Wed Dec 31, 2014 8:24 pm

Draken
Commander

Posts: 199
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:58 pm

SharkHunter wrote:
Brigade XO wrote:You will recall that the ships delivered to Monica were comming from Technodyne who was supposed to be decommissioning and scrapping the BCs. I took from part of that tale that it was also Techondyne that was building the replacements for the SLN. These were NOT ships being scrapped out of the Reserve fleet, they were being retired and scrapped.

So why was the SLN scrapping them? Ok, there was a program with newer/better BCs and those new ships were replacing them. So who was building the new ships? Technodyne.

Where were they building the new ships? I very much doubt that they were being built at yards out in the Verge.

So, where does Technodyne have production facilities for warships other than Yildin? Don't think we have been told. IF- a very big if- they do have yards capable of building new BC's from scratch somewhere out beyond the Core or at Yilden, then those would be really good places for the GA to strike as far as limiting the building of newer and presumabley more effective BC and smaller ships.

Hit the MILITARY production yards out in the Verge that are or have been building ships for the SLN. At the same time, hit the FF logistic and repair bases. That strikes directly at a major soruce of repair and replacement for the types of ships that would be the best for both commerce raiding and to cut the SLN off from forward basing closest to the GA. You kill the ships even if you don't also kill the crews and you remove logistic links that would provide Kingsford places to support his raiders.

The GA doesn't yet know that the SLN is talking about commerce raiding BUT they do know that it has been FF that has kept the boot heals on the planets under the control of OFS and it's "allied" partners in various Protectorate and similar systems. Remove that power base (by taking away the FF ships and then their potential logistic sources and you make it much easier to have systems both break away from OFS and the OFS/FF supported regimes. That kills both the ability of FF to reach to the GA and to put down systems which rise against whomever is being supported by OFS and FF.

Even if you leave any purely civilian yards (civilian / commercial construction only) alone in the same systems as FF centered military yards, you cripple the FF- and so BF- from being able to repair or replace ships.
Considering that this thread is about the Agamemmenons... especially if the GA doesn't even have to use the SD-P(s) to do the damage. Someone like Terekhov popping with a strike force, in at the best approach angle and saying "Remember Monica? y'all have two T-Hours to abandon the fleet base. Any offensive moves in our direction, buh bye to both ships and the base. Starting now..."

Cheaper would be to send few Saganami-C and cargo ship full of Mk 23 and maybe one CLAC with Katanas and Shrikes to scout and destroy any ships which will survive.
Top
Re: Best use of the Agamemnons (BC(P))--and other Ships
Post by SWM   » Thu Jan 01, 2015 9:10 pm

SWM
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5928
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: U.S. east coast

fester wrote:
SWM wrote:So Sharkhunter and Hutch--you are suggesting that the League has decided that, since it is already jumping into an undeclared war with Manticore, no one in the galaxy will notice or complain if the League also starts invading neutral nations while they're at it? The League doesn't care what their own people will think of this, let alone the rest of the galaxy?


Neutral rights only matter if the neutral is strong enough to make them matter. Look at the British blockade of Germany in WWI. Britain's deplayable naval power was superior to the USN, but they worked very hard to keep the US at no more than moderately annoyed at the blatant flouting of the previously accepted rules of blockade. If the Brits pissed off the US enough about the blockade, the US could retaliate (most easily by making any and all sales pure cash and carry in the US, escalating to selling nothing to no one, escalating to a couple of battleships escorting a large convoy to Copenhagen or Amersterdam....) The Dutch and Danes did not have the ability to make the RN care about what they thought of the blockade.

In this scenario, who are the major neutral powers that could hurt the Solarian League's war goals? The Andermanis? So the SLN avoids pissing on Andermani interests... the Judean League --- who the hell are they? A little piss pot 4th tier system that was previously allied to Manticore, what the fuck can they do to SLN interests --- nothing....

The entire strategy of Kingsford as developped by the MA penetration agent is to weaken the economies of the Haven Sector by hitting the weakpoints of their trading systems. 4th tier neutrals in the Haven Sector are a weak point... therefore they are a logical target.

You seem to be misunderstanding my point. I was not saying that the neutral nations targeted by the League could do anything useful to stop the League. I was saying that it would be obvious to the rest of the galaxy, including the League member states, what the League was doing. The League has always tried to look like the good guy, at the very least to their own members. If they started blatantly attacking neutral nations for no reason, it would cause quite a ruckus among the League members. The government might actually have to answer pointed questions about what it was doing.
--------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine
Top
Re: Best use of the Agamemnons (BC(P))--and other Ships
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Thu Jan 01, 2015 10:27 pm

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1958
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

SWM wrote:So Sharkhunter and Hutch--you are suggesting that the League has decided that, since it is already jumping into an undeclared war with Manticore, no one in the galaxy will notice or complain if the League also starts invading neutral nations while they're at it? The League doesn't care what their own people will think of this, let alone the rest of the galaxy?
fester wrote:
Neutral rights only matter if the neutral is strong enough to make them matter. Look at the British blockade of Germany in WWI. Britain's deplayable naval power was superior to the USN, but they worked very hard to keep the US at no more than moderately annoyed at the blatant flouting of the previously accepted rules of blockade. If the Brits pissed off the US enough about the blockade, the US could retaliate (most easily by making any and all sales pure cash and carry in the US, escalating to selling nothing to no one, escalating to a couple of battleships escorting a large convoy to Copenhagen or Amersterdam....) The Dutch and Danes did not have the ability to make the RN care about what they thought of the blockade.

In this scenario, who are the major neutral powers that could hurt the Solarian League's war goals? The Andermanis? So the SLN avoids pissing on Andermani interests... the Judean League --- who the hell are they? A little piss pot 4th tier system that was previously allied to Manticore, what the fuck can they do to SLN interests --- nothing....

The entire strategy of Kingsford as developped by the MA penetration agent is to weaken the economies of the Haven Sector by hitting the weakpoints of their trading systems. 4th tier neutrals in the Haven Sector are a weak point... therefore they are a logical target.

SWM wrote:You seem to be misunderstanding my point. I was not saying that the neutral nations targeted by the League could do anything useful to stop the League. I was saying that it would be obvious to the rest of the galaxy, including the League member states, what the League was doing. The League has always tried to look like the good guy, at the very least to their own members. If they started blatantly attacking neutral nations for no reason, it would cause quite a ruckus among the League members. The government might actually have to answer pointed questions about what it was doing.

In which case the Mandarins do what they do best. They Lie, and either claim that they weren't really neutrals, or deny that it happened at all, or that said neutral nation requested that OFS come in to protect them from the Manties.
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top
Re: Best use of the Agamemnons (BC(P))--and other Ships
Post by stewart   » Thu Jan 01, 2015 11:14 pm

stewart
Captain of the List

Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 10:54 pm
Location: Southern California, USA

fallsfromtrees wrote:
SWM wrote:So Sharkhunter and Hutch--you are suggesting that the League has decided that, since it is already jumping into an undeclared war with Manticore, no one in the galaxy will notice or complain if the League also starts invading neutral nations while they're at it? The League doesn't care what their own people will think of this, let alone the rest of the galaxy?
fester wrote:
Neutral rights only matter if the neutral is strong enough to make them matter. Look at the British blockade of Germany in WWI. Britain's deplayable naval power was superior to the USN, but they worked very hard to keep the US at no more than moderately annoyed at the blatant flouting of the previously accepted rules of blockade. If the Brits pissed off the US enough about the blockade, the US could retaliate (most easily by making any and all sales pure cash and carry in the US, escalating to selling nothing to no one, escalating to a couple of battleships escorting a large convoy to Copenhagen or Amersterdam....) The Dutch and Danes did not have the ability to make the RN care about what they thought of the blockade.

In this scenario, who are the major neutral powers that could hurt the Solarian League's war goals? The Andermanis? So the SLN avoids pissing on Andermani interests... the Judean League --- who the hell are they? A little piss pot 4th tier system that was previously allied to Manticore, what the fuck can they do to SLN interests --- nothing....

The entire strategy of Kingsford as developped by the MA penetration agent is to weaken the economies of the Haven Sector by hitting the weakpoints of their trading systems. 4th tier neutrals in the Haven Sector are a weak point... therefore they are a logical target.




In which case the Mandarins do what they do best. They Lie, and either claim that they weren't really neutrals, or deny that it happened at all, or that said neutral nation requested that OFS come in to protect them from the Manties.[/quote]

---------------

I agree with Falls --
(1) Neutrality is effective ONLY if it is recognized
In WWII Switzerland and Sweeden were neutral and not invaded by Germany because (a) there were multiple routes around them -- Germany had already occupied Norway and from the Winter War of 1940, had Finland and an ally against USSR. Switzerland was not blocking Germany's routes to either Italy or France.

(2) Franco's Spain was "neutral" in the Axis favor claiming they lacked the fuel to be an active participant in the war. A very strong case can be made for Francisco Franco being an "unindicted co-belligerant" in WWII.

In the Honorverse, the SLN and OFS could (a) make (or claim) that any "neutral" was providing "aid and comfort" to the GA and therefore subject to occupation.
Alt scenario, (b) send in agitators to disrupt and destabilize a planetary government, then arrive to "stabilize" the situation.


-- Stewart
Top

Return to Honorverse