Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jonathan_S, ThinksMarkedly and 48 guests

How many Star Nations are there with Ships of the Wall?

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: RF Member SDFs and Cataphract Missiles
Post by Hutch   » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:10 pm

Hutch
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1831
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:40 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama y'all

George J. Smith wrote:[quote="Weird Harold]
Technodyne is a major supplier to the SLN and SDF forces; they are a convenient cutout for the MAlign in this regard.

If the cataphracts hadn't been supplied to the SLN, you would have a point about them being linked to the MAlign instead of Technodyne. Since they were supplied to the SLN by a long-term contractor for the SLN and SDF forces, the finger points at Technodyne as the origin and the MAlign as just another customer.

I don't doubt that any SLN attempt to classify the Cataphracts will be doomed to failure because Technodyne isn't a Solarian based Transstellar, it is a Mesan Board Member and sole owner of the Yildin system.[/quote]

Can we expect that early in the next book, Yildin will be targeted by a task force commanded by Sir Aviers? He really wants some payback for all his people who were killed in Monica as a result of what Technodyne provided to the Monican Navy.

T&R
GJS[/quote]


Oh, I think the GA be visiting Yildun, albeit I think it will be either Truman or Tourville, as both have experience with deep-penetration raids and no love for Mesa/MAlignment property...

I think Aviars is going to be tied down terrifying various OFS governors or satraps out Talbott way....not to mention any FF units unlucky enough to encouter him... :twisted:

IMHO of course....YMMV.
***********************************************
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.

What? Look, somebody's got to have some damn perspective around here! Boom. Sooner or later. BOOM! -LT. Cmdr. Susan Ivanova, Babylon 5
Top
Re: RF Member SDFs and Cataphract Missiles
Post by Theemile   » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:42 pm

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5081
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

George J. Smith wrote:Where there any good sensor records of the Yawata strike available to identify the type of missiles used as the 2nd prong of the attack?

Without some form of information pointing to the type of missiles used it would be difficult to point fingers at Technodyne as the source of the missiles.


T&R
GJS



There were tons of sensor records from the attack. The fleets were not hit - any merchant ships in transit were not hit, the planetary forts were not hit, the distributed sensor drones were not hit. Only the main stations and mobile shipyards were hit and any collateral damage happened in their vicinity.

Everything was designed to come in hard and fast - too fast for anyone to react, but there are sensor records of the attack in spades. And people will see the drive signature of the Cataphract-C if they look for it in that mountain of data.

The following is from The Queen's brief post OB in MoH:


"My own feeling, and Admiral Hemphill's tentative analysis supports the same conclusion, is that what we have to be looking at is some radically new propulsive system. The missiles used in this attack were essentially conventional weapons—variants on our own MDMs. Analysis of their maneuvers from the moment they brought their drives up further suggests they were delivered in pods, probably coasted ballistically in to their launch points at a velocity of about point-two cee. The weapons that were used on the space stations were another case entirely. At this point, it looks like they were probably some sort of throwaway, disposable version of our own Shrikes, although nobody in Admiral Hemphill's shop has the least clue how Manpower—excuse me, how whoever launched this attack—managed to cram a weapon that powerful into a remote platform. Or how they gave its graser that sort of pulse endurance. For all intents and purposes, though, it's basically only a longer-ranged version of our own Mistletoe, probably using whatever new drive technology their ships use instead of relying completely on stealth the way Mistletoe does.


All of which came from data from the surviving sensor systems.
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top
Re: RF Member SDFs and Cataphract Missiles
Post by Jonathan_S   » Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:59 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8324
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Theemile wrote:
George J. Smith wrote:Where there any good sensor records of the Yawata strike available to identify the type of missiles used as the 2nd prong of the attack?

Without some form of information pointing to the type of missiles used it would be difficult to point fingers at Technodyne as the source of the missiles.


T&R
GJS



There were tons of sensor records from the attack. The fleets were not hit - any merchant ships in transit were not hit, the planetary forts were not hit, the distributed sensor drones were not hit. Only the main stations and mobile shipyards were hit and any collateral damage happened in their vicinity.

Everything was designed to come in hard and fast - too fast for anyone to react, but there are sensor records of the attack in spades. And people will see the drive signature of the Cataphract-C if they look for it in that mountain of data.

The following is from The Queen's brief post OB in MoH:


"My own feeling, and Admiral Hemphill's tentative analysis supports the same conclusion, is that what we have to be looking at is some radically new propulsive system. The missiles used in this attack were essentially conventional weapons—variants on our own MDMs. Analysis of their maneuvers from the moment they brought their drives up further suggests they were delivered in pods, probably coasted ballistically in to their launch points at a velocity of about point-two cee. The weapons that were used on the space stations were another case entirely. At this point, it looks like they were probably some sort of throwaway, disposable version of our own Shrikes, although nobody in Admiral Hemphill's shop has the least clue how Manpower—excuse me, how whoever launched this attack—managed to cram a weapon that powerful into a remote platform. Or how they gave its graser that sort of pulse endurance. For all intents and purposes, though, it's basically only a longer-ranged version of our own Mistletoe, probably using whatever new drive technology their ships use instead of relying completely on stealth the way Mistletoe does.


All of which came from data from the surviving sensor systems.
Yep. Now the first hot-wash look at the sensor records would have seen the difference in power settings between the 2 stages of the cataphract; the grav signal of the CM derived drive on the 2nd stage would be nearly unmissable.

But it would take a bit more subtle look to realize that it's 2 separate stages, like a Cataphract rather than a dual drive missile with a CM final drive (similar to the 4-drive system defense missiles Manticore developed; 3 normal drives + a CM drive). I suspect they've gone on and determined that as well, but it seems to me that there's at least some wiggle room there if RFC wants them to have missed it for now.
Top
Re: How many Star Nations are there with Ships of the Wall?
Post by kzt   » Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:25 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11354
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

They launched so close and moving so fast there would have no need for a second stage. When you launch at .2 c and within a million KMs you really don't need a sophisticated weapon. Heck, they didn't even need a warhead, the missile wedge and/or the missile body direct hit would have obliterated most of the targets.
Top
Re: How many Star Nations are there with Ships of the Wall?
Post by Theemile   » Wed Sep 24, 2014 7:23 am

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5081
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

kzt wrote:They launched so close and moving so fast there would have no need for a second stage. When you launch at .2 c and within a million KMs you really don't need a sophisticated weapon. Heck, they didn't even need a warhead, the missile wedge and/or the missile body direct hit would have obliterated most of the targets.


However, in the text I quoted above, Manticoran sensor techs did recognize them as multi-drive missiles in the post analysis, so they must have seen the 2nd drive fire up.

But agreed, it could have been done with SDMs just the same, just with a lower terminal velocity.
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top
Re: How many Star Nations are there with Ships of the Wall?
Post by dreamrider   » Thu Sep 25, 2014 7:29 pm

dreamrider
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1108
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 5:44 am

isaac_newton wrote:
potter12 wrote:SNIP

4. The RMN had battleships and Dreadnaughts that were in service for more than 200 years. There has to be navies around who still have Battleships of DN in service that are that old or older.


I guess this reply is not quite on topic, but the loooong life spans did surprise me when I first saw them... rather as if HMS Victory was still being used in WW1 & 2! :o


Um...HMS Victory was still being used, afloat, not drydocked,, for various types of in-port support and training duties until 1906, 151 years after her launch. 47 years as an active combatant. ...on and in the water and weather of Earth, not in the perfect vacuum pac of space

(I'm assuming here that solar wind and micro-meteors are not going to be a significant wear problem for a culture that has solved the environmental wear issues of cruising at .5c+.)

dr
Top
Re: How many Star Nations are there with Ships of the Wall?
Post by saber964   » Thu Sep 25, 2014 7:42 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

dreamrider wrote: quote="isaac_newton"]
potter12 wrote:SNIP

4. The RMN had battleships and Dreadnaughts that were in service for more than 200 years. There has to be navies around who still have Battleships of DN in service that are that old or older.


I guess this reply is not quite on topic, but the loooong life spans did surprise me when I first saw them... rather as if HMS Victory was still being used in WW1 & 2! :o


Um...HMS Victory was still being used, afloat, not drydocked,, for various types of in-port support and training duties until 1906, 151 years after her launch. 47 years as an active combatant. ...on and in the water and weather of Earth, not in the perfect vacuum pac of space

(I'm assuming here that solar wind and micro-meteors are not going to be a significant wear problem for a culture that has solved the environmental wear issues of cruising at .5c+.)

dr[/quote]


Then there is USS Constitution, still afloat and on active service from 1797 until 1881 then a receiving until 1907.
Top
Re: How many Star Nations are there with Ships of the Wall?
Post by dreamrider   » Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:21 pm

dreamrider
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1108
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 5:44 am

Theemile wrote:
kzt wrote:They launched so close and moving so fast there would have no need for a second stage. When you launch at .2 c and within a million KMs you really don't need a sophisticated weapon. Heck, they didn't even need a warhead, the missile wedge and/or the missile body direct hit would have obliterated most of the targets.


However, in the text I quoted above, Manticoran sensor techs did recognize them as multi-drive missiles in the post analysis, so they must have seen the 2nd drive fire up.

But agreed, it could have been done with SDMs just the same, just with a lower terminal velocity.


Although not in textev anywhere (yet), I suspect that the 2nd stage of a Cataphract must fire in order for the warhead to be fully effective.

dreamrider
Top

Return to Honorverse