SWM wrote:Where do you get the idea that the Junction has been virtually closed? Only one terminus of the Junction leads into Solarian space; all the rest of the termini are open for business. And business is picking up on many of those routes. The Merchant Marine has only been recalled from Solarian space. Manticoran merchants are still plying the spaceways to the Talbott cluster, the Anderman Empire, the Phoenix Cluster, Matapan, Basilisk and the Silesian quadrant, and now into Trevor's Star and Haven space.
Also, by now Manticore has some of its manufacturing capacity rebuilt. If White Haven was correct about his predictions, some of the smaller shipyards have to be in service building the first new ships by the end of Cauldron of Ghosts. If shipyards have been built already, I think we can assume that some factories have also been rebuilt by now.
Manticore is doing fine. They've lost trade within the Solarian League, but they still have plenty of trade with other areas, and manufacturing is coming back online.
In point of fact, none of the Manticoran Wormhole Junction's termini are shut down at the moment. The only one connecting to Solarian space also happens to connect to the Beowulf System, and the Grand Alliance has most definitely not closed that terminus, since Beowulf is currently a de facto and will soon be a de jure member of the aforesaid Grand Alliance.
For that matter, Manticore (and the Grand Alliance) now has control of a great many additional wormhole termini, and the fact that the Solarian League's merchant fleet is no longer being allowed to use them doesn't mean that the Manticoran merchant fleet can't. All Manty merchantmen were called home as part of the initial Operation Laocoön as the first stage in ratcheting up pressure on the Sollies (and, frankly, to get them out of the way before additional Solarian system governors had the same stupid idea of seizing them to use as hostages against the Star Empire). Once Lacoön II went into effect and the RMN began actively seizing other termini, those termini became available once again to the Manticoran merchant marine. Now, Manticore has no objection to carrying freight for people who are willing to ship it in Manticoran bottoms. In fact, Manticore sees this as a way to gently and gradually pry the people making use of their merchant fleet away from loyalty to the Mandarins. Carrying commerce for them will lessen the economic hit they take from what is effectively the Manticoran blockade while continuing to deny the service fees and shipping duties which fund the Solarian League's bureaucracy.
At the moment, the Star Empire has no intention of holding on to all of those other termini permanently. That doesn't mean that they won't hold on to some of them on a permanent basis, however. In addition, Manticore will probably negotiate an arrangement under which Manticoran shipping pays lower transit fees for other people's termini as part of mutual defense treaties which obligate the RMN to safeguard those termini. In other words, if the normal shipping duty for a 4,000,000 ton freighter, for example, was $10,000, Manticore might pay $7,500 in return for a guaranteed right of passage in time of war from the terminus' legal owner and a Manticoran guarantee to protect the legal owner's territorial integrity and possession of the terminus.
In general, one may assume that the Star Empire is going to continue its support of free trade, to continue to recognize the right of those who have wormhole termini to charge reasonable transit fees, and to be perfectly willing to act as the first line of defense/interstellar guardians of the wormhole network. It is quite probable that the Star Empire will insist on permanent possession of (or at least very, very long-term leases on) termini which belonged to especially bad actors before the war with the League. By the same token, it is very probable that the Star Empire will set up — probably in coordination with other members of the Grand Alliance — some sort of interstellar authority which would move in to stabilize and/or eliminate military threats to traffic through a terminus or the imposition of clearly confiscatory-level transit fees. In that case, however, Manticore would very, very much prefer a multi-nation board with a rotating chairmanship so that it would not be perceived as (and could not in fact become) a Manticoran version of OFS.
In response to the concerns being expressed over how withdrawals might be managed/policed over intrasystem distances. To be honest, this problem is simply not going to arise very often because people who are going to be making bank transactions will tend to be clustered in certain areas of the star system. It's unlikely that anyone is ever going to build a casino in orbit around Neptune or a shopping mall in orbit around Uranus. There are several ways in which banking institutions can deal with this sort of problem on the rare occasions when it arises. A given bank may use any and/or all of the approaches listed below.
First, if a banking institution has multiple nodes in a single star system and they are more than a very few minutes apart in terms of transmission times, then any customer's account may be distributed across all of those notes. That is, if the bank has 4 nodes, then no more than 25% of the account holder's funds may be withdrawn from any one of those nodes except by prior arrangement. This doesn't prevent a theoretical simultaneous withdrawal of funds from two separate locations, one of which might be unauthorized, but it does limit the percentage of funds which could be skimmed/scammed in this way.
Second, every Manticoran bank (and virtually every major non-Manticoran bank) issues electronic, encrypted withdrawal cards (or their equivalent) which must be presented for a withdrawal. The account holder may select the number of cards to be issued; once they are issued, however, it is the account holder's responsibility to maintain secure possession of them. By law (at least in Manticore) any funds disbursed to the holder of a verified card cannot be recovered from the bank by the account holder unless there is proof of wrongdoing by the banking institution. If it can be demonstrated that the card was illegally in the withdrawer's possession, then the withdrawer is legally liable for the funds, but the bank is not. If it can be demonstrated that the card was counterfeit or that the bank's security was hacked (whether by the bank or the withdrawer), then the bank becomes liable for restitution of funds on the basis that it should be more careful about its own electronic security.
Third, in most star systems it is the account holder's responsibility to inform the bank if he is traveling to a location which is going to be beyond reasonable light-speed-limited transmission ranges of his normal bank branch, just as it is the responsibility of a debit card in the United States to inform his bank if he's going to be traveling overseas or spending enough time in another state for him to have significant banking activity. The bank reserves the right to refuse to allow withdrawals from a distant site unless it has been informed and had of time that the customer will be traveling to that site.
Fourth, many banking institutions specifically state in their contracts with their account holders that transactions and payments will not be made until there's been sufficient time for notice of the transaction to reach their central banking hub in a given star system and confirmation of it to return to the site at which the transaction or payment is to be made. This may occasionally be inconvenient, but it would be highly unlikely for any transaction to be more than four or five light-hours from the bank's central hub. The maximum distance between Neptune and Earth, for example, is about 4.34 light-hours, so turnaround time on a transmission across that distance (which is enormously greater than most people are going to have to worry about in a star system) would be under 9 hours.
Fifth, the Banco de Madrid is not (by any means) the only bank which issues the equivalent of coins. A prudent traveler takes a supply of those, issued by his own bank, with him in a highly unlikely instance in which he's going to travel so far from home with in his own star system that communications lag would become a problem. It's also common practice for the account holder to "wire" what he considers to be a sufficient balance to a bank node at his destination, with the understanding that his withdrawals from that node will be limited to the funds he transferred into it.
Frankly, as I say, this situation is going to arrive very, very infrequently. The possibility/probability of deliberate fraud factors into the banking industry's basic assumptions, and practical safeguards have been worked out to prevent it. Those safeguards may, on occasion, fail, but when they do, it is almost always the result of deliberate criminal activity which brings in the legal authorities and in which liabilities are clearly established by law.