Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests

missiles

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
missiles
Post by Lord Skimper   » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:33 am

Lord Skimper
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1736
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:49 am
Location: Calgary, Nova, Gryphon.

I was just wondering why missiles have laser heads or nukes.

Why not just have them accelerate to light speed?

They are gravity wedge powered and gravity can go faster than light speed.

Matter turns into energy and then hits the enemy ship, isn't that what you want to happen?
________________________________________
Just don't ask what is in the protein bars.
Top
Re: missiles
Post by Michael Riddell   » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:44 am

Michael Riddell
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:10 pm
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.

Simple reason - it would be boring!!!! :P

Let's just say that what your proposing would be very difficult to pull off - it would require a direct hit of some form. The laser head gives a stand-off capability which increases the likely hood of causing damage to the target.

Mike. :)
---------------------
Gonnae no DAE that!

Why?

Just gonnae NO!
---------------------
Top
Re: missiles
Post by Duckk   » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:46 am

Duckk
Site Admin

Posts: 4200
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:29 pm

Gravity waves (in the Honorverse, not real life) are FTL, as they are ripples in extradimensional space. The manmade things that go with them in normal space aren't. Einstein is still the boss. Either the nodes burn out long before it hits lightspeed, or else it hits an molecule of H20 at 99% lightspeed and promptly vaporizes.
-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope
Top
Re: missiles
Post by The E   » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:50 am

The E
Admiral

Posts: 2683
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 1:28 pm
Location: Meerbusch, Germany

Michael Riddell wrote:Simple reason - it would be boring!!!! :P

Let's just say that what your proposing would be very difficult to pull off - it would require a direct hit of some form. The laser head gives a stand-off capability which increases the likely hood of causing damage to the target.

Mike. :)


It also requires an energy supply with sufficient juice to get the missiles that fast, impeller nodes durable enough to last long enough at high energy levels, and last but not least, enough room for your missiles to accelerate.

And all of that would result in a projectile that is ridiculously easy to see coming and very easy to evade and intercept.

A missile like that would combine the worst aspects of an old direct-contact nuke (the necessity to actually hit the target physically) with the worst aspects of an MDM (maneuverability at high speeds being effectively nil).
Top
Re: missiles
Post by Joat42   » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:53 am

Joat42
Admiral

Posts: 2140
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:01 am
Location: Sweden

Lord Skimper wrote:I was just wondering why missiles have laser heads or nukes.

Why not just have them accelerate to light speed?

They are gravity wedge powered and gravity can go faster than light speed.

Matter turns into energy and then hits the enemy ship, isn't that what you want to happen?


Ever tried to maneuver something that is going .9c or faster? Also, the targeting sensors are going to be severely degraded at those speeds.

It takes time (and distance) to accelerate missiles to those speeds, and while the missile is accelerating the target has probably moved somewhere else so in my opinion it's not a very effective solution unless you are targeting a stationary target; a la KEW.

---
Jack of all trades and destructive tinkerer.


Anyone who have simple solutions for complex problems is a fool.
Top
Re: missiles
Post by captainofthelist   » Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:18 pm

captainofthelist
Commander

Posts: 220
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:59 am

Lord Skimper wrote:I was just wondering why missiles have laser heads or nukes.

Why not just have them accelerate to light speed?

They are gravity wedge powered and gravity can go faster than light speed.

Matter turns into energy and then hits the enemy ship, isn't that what you want to happen?



To accelerate any object, like a ship or missle to light speed, it would require a hyper generator. As soon as one can be made small enough for a capital missle, your idea will be possible. Until then, the Honorverse will be stuck with grav drivers and impellers to push the missles along after launch.

The SEM has yet to reach the technological level of the Fourth Imperium, after all.
Top
Re: missiles
Post by Dafmeister   » Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:41 pm

Dafmeister
Commodore

Posts: 754
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:58 am

The whole reason for using 'contact' nukes initially, and more recently laser heads, is that scoring a physical hit at Honorverse velocities, and through Honorvers defences, is so difficult that trying to do so puts you at a serious disadvantage against an opponent using nukes or laser heads.
Top
Re: missiles
Post by Whitecold   » Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:19 am

Whitecold
Commander

Posts: 173
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 7:13 am
Location: Switzerland

Two things are getting mashed together here. The reason why honorverse ships use warheads is because David Weber built the verse so they need them. A ~70t missile going ~.6c already has a kinetic energy edging into the terraton TNT range, 6 orders of magnitude higher than the megaton contact or laserhead nuke, and bremsstrahlung means even deflecting such a missile with your sidewall would turn it into a massive radiation source, besides that the difference between massive particles and light vanishes in the relativistic limit.

Accepting that kinetics don't work in the Honorverse, you can't accelerate missiles to light speed, as they would disintegrate. Maximum acceleration for a starship is given by its compensator, max accel for a missile is given by what acceleration the physical components can endure without a compensator.
Top
Re: missiles
Post by kzt   » Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:16 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11336
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Whitecold wrote:Two things are getting mashed together here. The reason why honorverse ships use warheads is because David Weber built the verse so they need them. A ~70t missile going ~.6c already has a kinetic energy edging into the terraton TNT range, 6 orders of magnitude higher than the megaton contact or laserhead nuke, and bremsstrahlung means even deflecting such a missile with your sidewall would turn it into a massive radiation source, besides that the difference between massive particles and light vanishes in the relativistic limit.

It's pretty clear from the text of HotQ that David didn't really understand the amount of energy that missiles moving that fast really have. You can see this in the discussion of using nuke warheads against Grayson without even mentioning the KE of the missiles at all.
Top
Re: missiles
Post by Dafmeister   » Tue Mar 25, 2014 5:57 pm

Dafmeister
Commodore

Posts: 754
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:58 am

kzt wrote:
Whitecold wrote:Two things are getting mashed together here. The reason why honorverse ships use warheads is because David Weber built the verse so they need them. A ~70t missile going ~.6c already has a kinetic energy edging into the terraton TNT range, 6 orders of magnitude higher than the megaton contact or laserhead nuke, and bremsstrahlung means even deflecting such a missile with your sidewall would turn it into a massive radiation source, besides that the difference between massive particles and light vanishes in the relativistic limit.

It's pretty clear from the text of HotQ that David didn't really understand the amount of energy that missiles moving that fast really have. You can see this in the discussion of using nuke warheads against Grayson without even mentioning the KE of the missiles at all.


Or the expectation was that nukes would be used because of the damage a kinetic strike could do.
Top

Return to Honorverse