Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests

Shannon Foraker

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Shannon Foraker
Post by runsforcelery   » Mon Jun 16, 2014 6:19 pm

runsforcelery
First Space Lord

Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:39 am
Location: South Carolina

Roguevictory wrote:
cthia wrote:Shannon Foraker vs Sonja Hemphill.

Elizabeth and Eloise are right. There will be problems to overcome for an alliance to succeed. Some may be insurmountable. Others hilarious. Some will be both, but they all have their measure of importance and must be solved.

Some problems are even unforeseen, like the first formal working day between Foraker and Hemphill. Sonja is brilliant no doubt, but she can have some weapons development flukes. Someone has to be the leader as far as which R&D projects should be pursued. Foraker would have questioned Sonja about gutting Fearless and installing a grav lance. "Really Sonja?" :roll:

Which is the most tech savvy?


In all fairness in the combat environment of the time, aka pre-missile pod and MDM, the gravlance was a good idea as long as it was put on a ship that could survive to close to effective range and maintain enough non grav lance weaponry to fight effectively like a DN or SDN, or probably a heavy BC. And in a fleet action even the grav lance modded light cruiser could be dangerous. Honor proved that in the war games, The thing was no one in their right mind would have deployed Fearless to fight alone if they had a choice and unfortunately Honor got put in a position where Fearless had to fight alone.



This is absolutely a fair assessment, although Sonja did know the better and improved missiles were en route and in the pipeline and so should have realized (in fact, did realize) that energy range combat was probably going to become less of the end-all and be-all of capital ship combat. However, some people seem to have missed the point at which Sonja personally apologizes to Honor for the one-hand-behind-her-back way she had to fight at Basilisk. Recall that she said then (and she was being honest) that she never intended the conversion as anything other than a real-life testbed for her armament theory. This was supposed to be a one-off, only used in maneuvers to see how it worked, weapons mix. And, for that matter, Sonja had nothing at all to do with having Fearless swept under the rug to Basilisk; that was Janacek, her cousin, looking out for the family name. She was pissed her brainchild wasn't working out better, and I think it's been established that tact was never her strong suit, especially before the war, so it's not surprising that Honor felt Hemphill blamed her [Honor] personally for what had happened, but that isn't actually the case if you go back and read carefully.


"Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as Piglet came back from the dead.
Top
Re: Shannon Foraker
Post by namelessfly   » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:33 pm

namelessfly

Keep in mind that in a fleet engagement, there would be groups of ships armed with TWTSNBN which might enable tactics that would enhance their survivability.

Also, such ships armed with TWTSNBN might have been reserved for decisive battles, perhaps THE decisive battle, where there would either be no surviving RHN ships to report back about the new weapon, the new weapon would enable the RMN to destroy enough RHN to equalize the numerical imbalance, or the RMN was toast. The most plausible such scenario was a massive raid on Manticore. A few squadrons of CA or BC sized ships equipped only with TWTSNBN plus energy torpedoes supported by conventional BCs or CAs for missile defense might be able to close with an RHN fleet that was fixated on engaging RMN DNs and SDs and really ream them. Do this once to the RHN and you have achieved a strategic victory.

Cheap equalizer. Unfortunately; the RHN was able to witness TWTSNBN in action in OBS so it became completely useless.
Top
Re: Shannon Foraker
Post by J6P   » Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:38 pm

J6P
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 258
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:46 am
Location: USA, WA, Issaquah

namelessfly wrote:Cheap equalizer. Unfortunately; the RHN was able to witness TWTSNBN in action in OBS so it became completely useless.


So, the RHN, can commune with the dead can it?

Didn't seem to help them any...
Top
Re: Shannon Foraker
Post by wastedfly   » Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:47 pm

wastedfly
Commodore

Posts: 832
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:23 am

J6P wrote:
namelessfly wrote:Cheap equalizer. Unfortunately; the RHN was able to witness TWTSNBN in action in OBS so it became completely useless.


So, the RHN, can commune with the dead can it?

Didn't seem to help them any...


Otherwise they would have known the Navy had no hand in the Pierre coup. Maybe they were still experimenting at that stage of the war with this new tech?
Top
Re: Shannon Foraker
Post by Tenshinai   » Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:50 pm

Tenshinai
Admiral

Posts: 2893
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: Sweden

namelessfly wrote:Keep in mind that in a fleet engagement, there would be groups of ships armed with TWTSNBN which might enable tactics that would enhance their survivability.

Also, such ships armed with TWTSNBN might have been reserved for decisive battles, perhaps THE decisive battle, where there would either be no surviving RHN ships to report back about the new weapon, the new weapon would enable the RMN to destroy enough RHN to equalize the numerical imbalance, or the RMN was toast. The most plausible such scenario was a massive raid on Manticore. A few squadrons of CA or BC sized ships equipped only with TWTSNBN plus energy torpedoes supported by conventional BCs or CAs for missile defense might be able to close with an RHN fleet that was fixated on engaging RMN DNs and SDs and really ream them. Do this once to the RHN and you have achieved a strategic victory.

Cheap equalizer. Unfortunately; the RHN was able to witness TWTSNBN in action in OBS so it became completely useless.


Unlikely to work out. It´s not like a fleet engaged in battle will just ignore other enemies than their primary.

For it to work, you would essentially have to put the naughty weapons in something that could get seriously close before being spotted, which would mean putting them in modern LACs focused even more on low visibility.

And those, doesn´t have even remotely close to the energy levels required for the weapons.
Not to mention are probably far too small to even mount the big naughty weapon.

The closest you can get is probably that energy torpedoes MIGHT have some chance at a future on LACs, IF you can get it a large enough power budget.

As supposedly, ETs are very high damage as long as they dont have to pass through sidewalls, so against ships without sidewalls added front or aft(which will probably become a new standard far too soon) it could potentially be devastating even if only a few LACs carried it, ie having the threat there means the enemy have to honor it if he knows about it, forcing him to react to what is mostly a ghost, and if the enemy does not know about, anytime those LACs can get a clean shot in would really ruin someones day.

It all depends on just how effective it is as a weapon compared to the graser they already carry. If it´s just twice as powerful or something, it´s never going to be worth it, but if it´s a LOT more than that...

Weeell, it could be one more nasty little mindgame to play with the opposition. :twisted:
Top
Re: Shannon Foraker
Post by namelessfly   » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:22 pm

namelessfly

J6P wrote:
namelessfly wrote:Cheap equalizer. Unfortunately; the RHN was able to witness TWTSNBN in action in OBS so it became completely useless.


So, the RHN, can commune with the dead can it?

Didn't seem to help them any...



IRCC, there was an RHN dispatch boat that got it's wedge fried prior to battle but retained it's sensors.
Top
Re: Shannon Foraker
Post by wastedfly   » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:26 pm

wastedfly
Commodore

Posts: 832
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:23 am

namelessfly wrote:
IRCC, there was an RHN dispatch boat that got it's wedge fried prior to battle but retained it's sensors.


A dispatch boat is what you are going with? At near the Hyper limit? A couple hundred million kilometers distant? Okey dokey there.

Sure, a DB can see the ships wedge, but anything else? You have got to be kidding me.
Top
Re: Shannon Foraker
Post by Roguevictory   » Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:56 am

Roguevictory
Captain of the List

Posts: 419
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 8:15 pm
Location: Guthrie, Oklahoma, USA

Tenshinai wrote:
namelessfly wrote:Keep in mind that in a fleet engagement, there would be groups of ships armed with TWTSNBN which might enable tactics that would enhance their survivability.

Also, such ships armed with TWTSNBN might have been reserved for decisive battles, perhaps THE decisive battle, where there would either be no surviving RHN ships to report back about the new weapon, the new weapon would enable the RMN to destroy enough RHN to equalize the numerical imbalance, or the RMN was toast. The most plausible such scenario was a massive raid on Manticore. A few squadrons of CA or BC sized ships equipped only with TWTSNBN plus energy torpedoes supported by conventional BCs or CAs for missile defense might be able to close with an RHN fleet that was fixated on engaging RMN DNs and SDs and really ream them. Do this once to the RHN and you have achieved a strategic victory.

Cheap equalizer. Unfortunately; the RHN was able to witness TWTSNBN in action in OBS so it became completely useless.


Unlikely to work out. It´s not like a fleet engaged in battle will just ignore other enemies than their primary.


/quote]

Well the Fearless traded two Graser and 5 Missile tubes to get a Grav Lance and seven Energy Torpedo tubes, two Lasers, and two missile tubes per broadside IIRC. The Homer class BC in HOS comes with one grav lances in each broadside by default. It also has four Energy Torp tubes, eight Lasers, eight Grasers, and twenty Missile tubes per broadside. Mix some Grav Lance equipped BCs into each of your fleet deployed battlecruiser squadrons and when your enemies don't know what they can do they can inflict a lot of damage. Than once the enemy knows they are out there they will have to decide whether they should focus their fire on your capships or your BCs. That confusion and any fire shifted away from your capships helps you even if the Grav Lance BCs can't close to effective range. And even without counting her grav lances and energy torps a Homer has more conventional firepower than a Sultan.

Of course the shift to missile warfare and MDMs changed this a lot.

I'm not saying the Grav Lance was Sonja's best idea but I think it gets a lot more dislike than it should. It could be very effective with the right tactics. Even Fearless showed that in her first post refit wargame.

Sorry made a massive error on the Homer's weapons, didn't realize that they carried Grav Lances as standard issue at first.
Last edited by Roguevictory on Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:18 am, edited 2 times in total.
Top
Re: Shannon Foraker
Post by kzt   » Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:02 am

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11351
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

GL max range is less then effective range for energy weapons. So you need to somehow survive to get there. As the Haven CO mentioned, right before a DN killed him and his BCs, BCs don't do well against DN/SD scale missiles.
Top
Re: Shannon Foraker
Post by Roguevictory   » Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:38 am

Roguevictory
Captain of the List

Posts: 419
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 8:15 pm
Location: Guthrie, Oklahoma, USA

kzt wrote:GL max range is less then effective range for energy weapons. So you need to somehow survive to get there. As the Haven CO mentioned, right before a DN killed him and his BCs, BCs don't do well against DN/SD scale missiles.



The main problem Fearless had was that equipping her with the Grav Lance and Energy Torps gutted her missile capability and conventional energy weapon. Like I said the idea would work much better on a ship whose conventional weapons array wouldn't be as crippled by the sacrifices made to get the Grav Lance and Energy Torpedoes in so the Grav Lance and Energy Torp tactic would be an option rather than a necessity. Obviously someone in universe agreed with me or the Homer class wouldn't have the Grav Lance and Energy Torps plus the conventional weapons they do.

The Homers can hold their own in a conventional battle against other ships in their weight class but they have the option of a Grav Lance/Energy Torp strike if their captains see the chance for one.
Top

Return to Honorverse