cthia wrote:My definitive stance.
With the introduction of Apollo, slate wiping technology, I simply feel that the RMN should have pulled in their horns and deployed to defend the Home System. A preemptive strike could have destroyed production and ended their chances to ever use the weapon. The argument is that bottlenecks were unanticipated. Well lets go with that. We do not foresee any bottlenecks. So let's deploy to protect 'liege and lady' and our most important production facilities to date. I know that strategic initiative and certain systems would have fallen. That would have been a moot point if later, Eighth Fleet would have been sitting off the coast of Haven ready to pounce, completely unchallenged. Everything lost would have been recovered. I know it could have been bad, but as bad as what almost happened?
If you unveil insurmountable technology, it automatically hits the top of your opponents strategic considerations. The US makes preemptive strikes against Weapons of Mass Destruction all the time.
The RMN prayed that it would find Bolthole so it could seek out and destroy it.
Haven knew where the RMN's bolthole was.
No-brainer.
With all due respect, your definitive stance is wrong.
Have a nice day!
