tlb wrote:cthia wrote:Yes, the first several pages of that thread and on up to half the thread was me arguing the simple fact that Beowulf's actions would be targeted as treasonous.
Rather than a repetition of the entire discussion, the way I read the first half of that thread was as variations on the following paraphrased statements and responses:
Cthia writes "The Solarian League will consider Beowulf to have committed treason".
Someone else writes "What Beowulf did was legal and not treason at all".
Cthia writes "But Beowulf will have to consider the reaction of the Solarian League to its treason".
Someone else writes "Beowulf did what it needed to do and that was not treason".
About midway through the thread, we finally got you to expound and discovered that there was unspoken clause to your main statement. So it really went like this in your mind:
Cthia writes "The Solarian League will consider Beowulf to have committed treason (,because Beowuf had an obligation to the League that it was breaking)".
You just restated that hidden clause in the post above:cthia wrote:Um, if you agree that the League would view Beowulf's actions as treasonous, then #1 is implied.
Where #1 is the following contention that we finally got you to state:
1. Beowulf was guilty of actual treason by breaking unwritten, implied obligations to the League that they had accrued by being a founding member.
In my opinion, A does not imply B; but if B were true, then it would justify A.
****** *
Your post is really confusing. Your closing argument uses numbers (#1 and #2) then switches to letters (A and B) that either aren't related or the logic is orphaned. Additionally, you cannot argue "paraphrased statements," instead of the actual statements. Paraphrased statements are your interpretation of what was actually stated and meant.
Remember everyone's - and I do mean every single person besides myself - erroneous interpretation of John Harington's quote? Every subsequent paraphrase erroneously bastardized it to their own intent.
That is the problem with hearsay. A teacher of mine way back in grade school conducted an experiment where she whispered a paragraph in a student's ear that went around the room in whispers (gossip). By the time the last student got the gossip, is was severely distorted.
Please argue actual posts, not paraphrases. Paraphrases sre simply gossip. I have a difficult enough time hoping everyone will properly digest what's actually written.
Let's take this discussion to the ring where it belongs. LOL