Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings | |
---|---|
by cthia » Fri Oct 12, 2018 7:03 am | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
Likening Honor to Tsang, and Nimitz to the Dispatch Boat tasked with summoning Tsang at the moment of truth makes me laugh my ass off. Talk about a burst transmission! Imagine Nimitz sitting there watching Burdette intently, emotional impellers hot. As soon as he detected Burdette's crease he summoned the cavalry in a burst transmission . . .
<Now! Honor! Now! Cut the bastard in half!> 'SHA WING!' <Now off with his head!> 'SHA WING!' <Atta Girl> <Thought you were going to kill my love affair with celery did you? Silly rabbit, Keys were meant to be cut> 2 agin 1 Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings | |
---|---|
by cthia » Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:04 am | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
Comte de Bussy-Rabutin isn't exactly correct. Voltaire is closer but yet so far. In fact, a good argument could be mounted against. Remember the story of Samson and Delilah? The Walls of Jericho? David and Goliath? Daniel in the lion's den? God is on the side of the righteous, not the mightiest. Might doesn't make right in God's eye. Faith of a mustard seed can move mountains. Be it mountains of evil or mountains of people. Strength comes from faith, not by secular magnitude. The bigger they are the harder they fall.
"I can't see! I can't see! "What's the matter?" "I got my eyes closed." O ye of little faith. Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Thu Oct 18, 2018 5:27 pm | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8392
|
Catching up on the forums after taking a break to avoid UH spoilers and came across this. You'd be throwing away terminal velocity if you did an unnecessary drive shutdown. It might still have a place, but in a 3 drive MDM it wouldn't make sense to me to shut the 1st drive down early. Yeah the defenders would lose tracking, but they'd be losing it in the earliest part of the missile's flight when they often can't separate an individual missile from the thundering herd anyway. They'd have lots of time (up to 6 minutes) once the 2nd and then 3rd drives came up to achieve a lock and engage, and the lower terminal velocity makes the intercept easier and gives the defense more time to take shots at the missile. If you did a shutdown trick I think you'd want to insert the delay before your final drive, and hope that you'd guessed the enemy's future location well enough that you only needed to bring the final drive up for seconds to achieve firing position. OTOH missile without wedges up lose most of their rad shielding, so if you were trying to coast in that close you run a somewhat higher risk of losses from proximity nukes. Plus if the enemy is maneuvering after your missiles go ballistic you'd have to run the final drive for much longer to get a firing position and that negates a lot of the advantage of disappearing off their tracking when the penultimate drive shuts down. So maybe situtationally useful, but far from a slam dunk tactic - IMHO. |
Top |
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings | |
---|---|
by cthia » Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:30 am | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
Thanks for the post Jonathan. No, I don't think it'd be a slam dunk tactic either, or even a tactic that should be adopted against any traditional opponent. I was thinking more of a situational tactic as well, against an opponent whose ECM, as mentioned, proves to be rather difficult, again, like with the MA who I'm hoping comes out of the closet with quite a few new wrinkles - where more hits, or some hits are better than little to none. I'm imagining and predicting the Lenny Dets to be extremely hard to find touting ECM that makes them insanely effective against GA tech without a GA rabbit pulled out of the hat. Lenny Dets: Advantages. Disadvantages.
Considering range to target, I was thinking there might be a sweet spot where the loss of terminal velocity is made up for by optimal range to target and sheer numbers. A targeted ship always seem to take significant time to achieve missile lock of the incoming missile. ****** * On another front . . . For sake of argument, let's say the RMN can't control but 50 missiles but launched 200 in groups of four far enough apart to bounce control from group A to group B to group C to group D as group A goes into attack run. Seems it could be effectively achieved because of the optimal launching distances well inside the need for FTL. There's an inherent problem with this solution, yes, but I always believed FTL could be used to establish initial control of different broods of missile groups instead of overcoming enormous distances. And/or even quickly bouncing updated position between groups. I'm sure the tactics I've mentioned have been thought of before, with the application being so obvious. The difference I'm proposing is attempting to accomplish it well within sub light distances of sub light missile control that doesn't need FTL control in the first place, but utilizing it anyway to jockey control between groups of missiles - effectively overcoming the limitation of fire control and controlling more missiles - instead of using the advantage of FTL to overcome extreme distances. Think of an Indy 500 car racing around the track lapping a Yugo, updating the Yugo as to where it is. I also wonder if group B thru C can be auto programmed to lock onto the wedges of the group ahead of them to follow them in. That would effectively eliminate the need to control three separate groups of missiles who are simply following the wedges in front of them. I apologize for the jumbled thoughts for a path of logic whose plot hasn't completely settled in my head. At any rate, FTL used to augment fire control instead of to overcome extreme firing range. Used in conjunction with shutting down drives to confuse an enemy's effective ECM. The RMN has never encountered an opponent whose ECM is on a par or better than theirs. But of course, that's where RMN advantage lay. However, I see Apollo as being more adaptable. Or rather, Honor does. Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings | |
---|---|
by tlb » Fri Oct 26, 2018 1:48 pm | |
tlb
Posts: 4056
|
RFC has used the meme about an ancient Chinese curse that goes "May you live in interesting times". I hope most people know that this is neither ancient nor Chinese. I found this all in the internet (so you might want to recheck that I am not repeating falsehoods).
It was first used in that form by Sir Austen Chamberlain (brother of Neville) in 1936 when addressing a Birmingham association about the "grave injury" to collective security by German's violation of the Treaty of Locarno:
His father had used the same figure of speech in 1898, but without claiming that it was either Chinese or a curse:
The closest Chinese saying that people can find was reported in 1836 by a British diplomat named John Francis Davis, who published “The Chinese: A General Description of the Empire of China and Its Inhabitants” which included this adage:
|
Top |
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings | |
---|---|
by ldwechsler » Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:56 pm | |
ldwechsler
Posts: 1235
|
But it's such a useful quote. Add to that the OTHER Chinese quotes: "May could come to the attention of the authorities" and "May you get your heart's desire" and you realize how interesting some quotes are no matter who actually said them. |
Top |
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings | |
---|---|
by tlb » Sat Oct 27, 2018 11:42 am | |
tlb
Posts: 4056
|
It is better to have no attribution for outside quotes, than a false one. The lines you give are fine without claiming to be Chinese (although I think you meant "May you come to the attention"), but it is much better to have the correct attributions for things both outside the forum and within. Which is something that really bugs me about people who mess up the begin-quote end-quote structure. The problem is when you get into the borderline racist "Confucius say" jokes. |
Top |
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings | |
---|---|
by ldwechsler » Mon Oct 29, 2018 7:04 am | |
ldwechsler
Posts: 1235
|
Thanks for the typo correction. As for attribution, after a while some things that are incorrect become "common knowledge." You are right about the Chinese origin of the quotes although some similar things have been written there over the years. But at this point, most people who hear that it is Chinese believe. In a few thousand years, it will seem like an absolute fact. And it is a great line. |
Top |
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings | |
---|---|
by cthia » Sat Nov 10, 2018 8:09 am | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
Remember the story of Samson and Delilah? The Walls of Jericho? David and Goliath? Daniel in the lion's den? God is on the side of the righteous, not the mightiest. Might doesn't make right in God's eye.
The faith of a mustard seed can move mountains. Be it mountains of evil or mountains of people. Strength comes from faith, not by secular magnitude. The bigger they are the harder they fall. -cthia "I can't see! I can't see! "What's the matter?" "I got my eyes closed." O ye of little faith. ****** * CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS I am continuing to take a beating within my own circle of friends for opening this particular can-o-worms. My niece hasn't quite forgiven me yet. It is turning into a discussion of the males against the females. I suppose it is because it is a woman who wields the unfair advantage. If the situation was reversed I think they'd feel differently. I'll attempt to defend my stance a bit better. The People's Champion vs Burdette was personal. It was not simply personal to Honor and Nimitz, it was personal to God. To Grayson. The Graysons. The Protector. The Keys. And to the Church of Humanity Unchained. To deceitfully disrespect that which is represented by Tester is just plain old wrong. Τhe People's Champion deceitfully representing the Church and Tester is legally wrong, immoral and unrighteous. Burdette shouldn't have had to worry whether or not the contest would be fought fairly. That's just plain morally wrong. And its certainly not the Christian thing to do to mix inhuman like abilities like those found in Genies on a planet without Genies, and withhold the fact. And since it had been conducted in such a fashion . . . JUST MIGHT MEAN BURDETTE'S RHETORIC IS TRUE. The mistake of not coming clean could further taint the opinion of the galaxy against Genies. Burdette could be made out to be the pure essence of a martyr, destroying the integrity of the Protector of Grayson and his People's Champion. I see a real potential for a Constitutional Crisis on Grayson. Just like that, the Manticoran infidels are indeed shown to be deceitful. The duel was NOT carried out with respect to what is near and dear to the hearts and souls of Graysons—the teachings of Tester. Integrity. Tester, who does not engage in deceit, or murder. Honor has presented a can-o-worms which should never be set loose. I think I was in error about Benjamin's decision never to lie to his constituents, because I haven't been able to locate the passage. At least not in Flag in Exile. The closest I've found is his decision to never ever lie to reporters, which is essentially the same thing when it comes to the can-o-squirming-worms I opened beginning here. If the Protector is ever questioned point blank about his Champion's secret and unfair advantage during the duel with Burdette, the Protector will not lie to the press. Burdette had a right to know . . . Morally and legally. Expanding one of my past posts . . . Is it exactly righteous to withhold knowledge of Honor's ability under the circumstances of this duel? Knowing full-well Burdette didn't have a chance, and knowing because of it, Burdette himself didn't know he had NO CHANCE. I agree that it is righteous for the People's champion to use her talents. It is part of the riches God has bestowed upon her. So why not proclaim it on high and scream it to the world for all who may dare to challenge the People's Champion, the truth about she who represents God - lest God be put in a position to be accused of deceit - and then let [him] be foolish, or wise, to challenge. Blasphemous actions by a Protector and his Champion could destroy Grayson. At the very least, with foreknowledge of Honor's inhuman-like abilities Burdette may have chosen the low guard position, instead of the high guard . . . opening himself up to be sliced from asshole to appetite. On present day Earth, one may have a right to know if one is going up against what is essentially a mutant. Clark Kent's parents, to Clark's chagrin, told him he didn't have any business on the gridiron. This is the entire crux of the war on present day Earth of those who object to letting mutants live amongst them. And they have a point. Are mutants going to be fair, honest and forthright in all exchanges and interactions with their fellow man? If there is a disagreement between two humans, does not he who may end up in a quarrel have a right to know who, or what, he may be angering? Do they have a right on the gridiron, unfairly running up tremendous points possibly hurting and killing people in the process? Grayson is a religious planet completely devoid of Genies. Well, until Honor. IINM, Honor and Beth are the only Genies who have ever set foot on Grayson. It would be highly irresponsible, unfair and dangerous—arguably murderous—to mix the two without knowledge. Grayson's past time of baseball would be destroyed by the influx of genies. Heck, steroids has damn near destroyed it now. Genies, Scrags and San Martinos would kill people and the sport. Perhaps that is why there isn't many planets where contact sports has survived. Benjamin's decision never to lie to reporters . . .
Pandora's box originally opened. Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings | |
---|---|
by Vince » Sat Nov 10, 2018 10:23 pm | |
Vince
Posts: 1574
|
Cthia, I advise you to surrender to your friends and family on this issue. If you don't, you are going to lose, and not gracefully.
In your arguments are you saying that the end justifies the means? That Burdette and Mueller were justified in conspiring in secret to murder innocent civilians that they were sworn to protect, including children, in order to discredit the Protector and Honor? That Burdette was justified in his actions that caused Reverend Hanks' death? That Honor should have been deliberately and willfully murdered at the direction of Burdette? And that because that Honor as Protector's Champion was a genie should excuse Burdette from the justice that he, and he alone, chose and demanded to face and receive? Even when Burdette knew that Honor had been injured , and that gave him another potential advantage (beyond that of holding the rank of Master Second in the sword) in setting out to deliberately and willfully kill her in single combat? Even though every Grayson alive, including Burdette, is a genie with the heavy metals tolerance that Honor lacks? Italics are the author's, boldface is my emphasis. (That genetically engineered heavy metals tolerance is probably the primary reason why Graysons were alive by the time of The Honor of the Queen.) Because in your aguments, of the questions that I have asked above, you are answering yes to each of them. And your friends and family realize it. As far as I can tell, the people of the Honorverse, including both Manticorans and Graysons, accept that God gave man free will to make choices, and accept responsibility for the results of those choices. Are you saying that Honor should not have the right to choose to face her Test that she had trained for in her duty as Protector's Champion? God works his will in the world through the choices that his followers make, no matter who they might be or what gifts he has given them. Remember that Justice is depicted as a blindfolded woman holding both a balance scale and a SWORD. Would you excuse Burdette, a murderer, from facing true Justice and Judgement? Again, that is what you are saying. And your friends and family realize it.
-------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes. |
Top |