Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests

Honorverse ramblings and musings

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by cthia   » Thu Sep 10, 2015 8:12 pm

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

munroburton wrote:
cthia wrote:Here's the thing. I admit to having preconceived notions about the Andermani. Yet the only few instances that they had to alleviate that notion they failed miserably. During Honor Harrington's Task Group's sailing into the Andermani capital system, I found Andermani behaviour deplorable -- and very much in character to what I expected of subjects of an Empire. Their hatred for all things Manticoran puzzled me and bordered on outright unhealthy obsession. IMO, Graf von Sternhafen was a prime example of what to expect from an Empire. The needling of Jessica Epps was childish and was a result of obsessive hatred. Thank God for Rabenstrange. If they were so interested in the suppression of piracy then why was war almost kicked off over a Manticoran ship attacking a pirate. They should have helped, instead of antagonized!


Honor herself makes the point that the RMN has had some truly appalling examples of commanding officers. Hellbarde's captain wasn't any worse than Young and Sternhafen seems similar to Harold Styles or even Edward Janacek.

Whether they were jackasses or not, the Andermani officer corps had a genuine reason to be irritated by Manticorans. From the IAN's point of view, they(a mere single system kingdom!) blocked expansion into Silesia for a long time, annexed Basilisk, got basing rights in Gregor, intervened with Midgard/Asgard and they got to fight a real war rather than being limited to essentially policing duties. And when the alliance was signed, the bloody Manties more or less officially got into the business of expanding!

All things considered, I think the Andies have been very tolerant and patient. Particularly during the first Haven war - they could have grabbed all of Silesia and there would be little Manticore could do about it.

My bold.

You really believe that to be true? Interesting. I often thought myself what would have happened if war would have broken out with the Andies at the point of the Jessica Epps incident? Would Pritchart still have been compassionate or tried to take advantage? If the former, would they have helped take on the Andies as well?

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by kzt   » Thu Sep 10, 2015 8:42 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

cthia wrote:I keep reading disturbing posts akin to something like 'The Silesians should be happy to get the Andermani compared to who they have now. '

That's truly disturbing and just plain old... wrong.

Life, she is hard. The world does not have the two modes you seem to imagine. Things range from really awful to really nice. But all the not nice places are not Cambodia circa 1975, nor are all the not awful places Zurich circa 2015. And not all the people in the nice places get to live the life of a billionaire in London.
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Jonathan_S   » Thu Sep 10, 2015 9:09 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 9092
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

cthia wrote:IMO, Graf von Sternhafen was a prime example of what to expect from an Empire. The needling of Jessica Epps was childish and was a result of obsessive hatred. Thank God for Rabenstrange. If they were so interested in the suppression of piracy then why was war almost kicked off over a Manticoran ship attacking a pirate. They should have helped, instead of antagonized!

The Andermani failed again, IMO, when it appeared they were going to have to work with the Manties. What an angry group of people. I always thought Elizabeth should send out flyers that said something like 'Manticore: don't hate us because we're rich.'
Whereas I took Honor's view; that incident was more their version of Paval Young, or maybe Santino, shooting first and not bothering to ask questions. Captain Gortz appears to let the harrassing of Jessica Epps become personal; to the point he (apparently) didn't check their claims that the "Sittich" was only impersonating an Andie merchant. Gortz apparently felt he was in the right and was defending his countries merchantman from high handed Manticoran interference.

He was wrong, but that's not the same as knowingly interfering with the interception of a pirate.


Think how the USN would react if a Chinese patrol boat was pulling over an (apparently) US flagged freighter in international waters. (Though in that case the existance of a US flagged freighter might be a hint something wasn't right ;))



But see how Rabenstrange and the Emperor gave covert assistance to Honor when the Wayfairer-class was first deployed to Silesia. I feel that's more representative of how the Andies normally interact with Maniticore. They may have some resentment for not having had free reign to offer their assistance and assimilation to especially troubled planets in Silesia, but until the miscalculation against High Ridge's government they weren't pushing for a war. And even then it was mostly that High Ridge was sending conflicting signals and refusing to talk to them.

The Emperor was looking for some quid pro-quo for being neutral in Manticore's favor and not jiggling their elbow during the war with Haven and High Ridge was being high handed while simultaneously drawing down not just the forces deployed around Silesia but the entire RMN. The provocations were supposed to be a basically diplomatic ploy to force High Ridge to either put up or shut up (deploy heavy forces and a clear diplomatic message, or make concessions) High Ridge typically waffled and did neither, putting Honor in the hot seat with orders to refuse to yield an inch without the forces to actually convince the Andies that the High Ridge government was serious about their refusal to talk. (And the admiral who got the assignment on the Andies side wasn't the best choice; stupid politics)
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by SWM   » Thu Sep 10, 2015 10:54 pm

SWM
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5928
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: U.S. east coast

I think the underlying difference in opinion, cthia, is that you tend to have a very black-and-white view of things. It shows in many of our previous discussions. And there is not always a problem with having a black-and-white perspective. It is sometimes good to have that kind of clarity. Sometimes portraying things as shades of gray is merely an excuse for not setting boundaries.

Many of the rest of us, on the other hand, tend to think in shades of gray. I think this difference drives many of our discussions. It makes things interesting. :)

David Weber almost never writes stories with black-and-white divisions. The characters, organizations, and nations may tend strongly to one side or another, but there are always elements that soften the edges, and often deep ambiguities.

As for empires, David has a certain fondness for monarchies. Most of the monarchies in his books are portrayed in a very positive light, while the supposed democracies often come off poorly in contrast. Some of us remember David's past discussions about monarchies. That is probably affecting our perspective on the Anderman Empire.
--------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by munroburton   » Fri Sep 11, 2015 2:36 am

munroburton
Admiral

Posts: 2379
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:16 am
Location: Scotland

cthia wrote:My bold.

You really believe that to be true? Interesting. I often thought myself what would have happened if war would have broken out with the Andies at the point of the Jessica Epps incident? Would Pritchart still have been compassionate or tried to take advantage? If the former, would they have helped take on the Andies as well?


Sure. At one point all Manticore could shake loose to send to Silesia were less than a half dozen Q-ships. Not exactly enough to slow down the IAN, never mind stop it. A couple of battle squadrons sent to seize and blockade the Gregor wormhole would have cut off any attempts to use Home Fleet to attack the heart of Andermani space.

If war broke out, forget about an alliance between Haven and Manticore. The alliance would be between Haven and Anderman - there's no way Pritchart could pull the Republic into a military alliance with Manticore, not without evidence of MAlign interference.

Pritchart would have been sympathetic, but only to an extent. High Ridge's policies were so fatuous he almost landed himself with four or five foreign crises. War with Anderman, war with Haven, losing Erewhon, stumbling into the Talbott Cluster(ok, that last isn't entirely HR's fault), where it all kicked off with the Sollies.
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Theemile   » Fri Sep 11, 2015 7:13 am

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5378
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

munroburton wrote:
cthia wrote:My bold.

You really believe that to be true? Interesting. I often thought myself what would have happened if war would have broken out with the Andies at the point of the Jessica Epps incident? Would Pritchart still have been compassionate or tried to take advantage? If the former, would they have helped take on the Andies as well?


Sure. At one point all Manticore could shake loose to send to Silesia were less than a half dozen Q-ships. Not exactly enough to slow down the IAN, never mind stop it. A couple of battle squadrons sent to seize and blockade the Gregor wormhole would have cut off any attempts to use Home Fleet to attack the heart of Andermani space.

If war broke out, forget about an alliance between Haven and Manticore. The alliance would be between Haven and Anderman - there's no way Pritchart could pull the Republic into a military alliance with Manticore, not without evidence of MAlign interference.

Pritchart would have been sympathetic, but only to an extent. High Ridge's policies were so fatuous he almost landed himself with four or five foreign crises. War with Anderman, war with Haven, losing Erewhon, stumbling into the Talbott Cluster(ok, that last isn't entirely HR's fault), where it all kicked off with the Sollies.


As for allies in that case, High Ridge (and Cromarty to a degree) had already burned the relationship with Talbot (one of just 3 of Manticore's allies in the first war to supply Wallers to the war cause). Grayson, (the 3rd ally to supply wallers to the cause) had already been approached by Haven and asked to sit out any conflict with Manticore and was only a few members of the keys away from cutting military ties with Manticore.

Had that happened, Manticore would have had no allies with significant navies to support them.
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by JeffEngel   » Fri Sep 11, 2015 7:54 am

JeffEngel
Admiral

Posts: 2074
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:06 pm

cthia wrote:I keep reading disturbing posts akin to something like 'The Silesians should be happy to get the Andermani compared to who they have now. '

That's truly disturbing and just plain old... wrong.
The Silesian Confederacy could not protect its citizens from piracy, slaver raids, constant rebellions, or system governors that worked with, even for those pirates and slavers. It appointed plenty of those system governors, who sold their "own" people out to that. Its Navy at best was ineffectual and at worst was part of the problem. The only law and order the Confederacy could count on for centuries was what the IAN and RMN provided as a side-effect of protecting their own concerns and whatever amount of sheer human charity the officers and crews involved felt and could spare from their duties otherwise. I suppose it's worth mentioning that some Silesian local governments sometimes tried to be better, but with that kind of background, they did not have the means.

So yes - if foreign partition and occupation means a whole lot less likelihood of getting robbed, raped, enslaved, or killed, for you and your family, then yes, you really should be cheering on the invader. Doing otherwise would go out the far end of disturbing and safely into just plain wrong.

States exist for the benefit of their people, not the other way around. The Confederacy hadn't benefited its people for a long, long time.

The Anderman Empire certainly does benefit its people. It's a bit more eager to make the people of other planets its people than suits 21st century A.D. (or maybe even 20th century P.D.) sensibilities, and that's a perfectly fine thing to count against them - within reason. And it's a centralized system without generous provisions for people making up their minds about the direction of the state on a popular basis - another thing to count against them, within reason. But it does take care of its people, and it will often make a point of making other people its people specifically when it can do it so much better than the existing government can. They deserve the credit for that at least as much as the blame for expansionism and political centralization.

The Andermani - and now, finally, Manticore - are fully on the side against the pirates, slavers, and terrorists. The Confederacy's governnment and elite never were. Which side do you think the Silesian people should be on? Which side would you want to be on?
It makes me want to go and find Helga Boltitz and give her a big huge heaping helping of love and understanding. IMO, she basically issued this same concern to Gwen Archer regarding Manticore's help with Dresden. In a nutshell, why can't a polity just plain be good for us, not just better than what we have. That statement is denigrating and doesn't show much promise.

Silesia's not Talbott. I'm not saying Helga didn't have a point, but she was selling Manticore short still and was worrying about a political arrangement that would nullify Dresden's accomplishments and identity, an arrangement not like what came to pass there.

The Silesian Confederacy was not "just plain good for" Silesians. It wasn't a quaint burg with problems. It was a place where the wolves roamed free and the shepherds worked for them more often than their herd.
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Rincewind   » Fri Sep 11, 2015 11:24 am

Rincewind
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 277
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 1:22 pm

cthia wrote:
I alluded to my own prejudices regarding Empires in a previous post. Can you name an Empire that didn't foster some sort of resentment and ill will? A type of government associated with the brewing of a Genghis Khan?

Let's see. There was:

10) The Akkadian Empire (2334 BC to 2083 BC) was an empire centered in the city of Akkad and its surrounding region (in Ancient Iraq). The Akkadian state was the predecessor of the ethnic Akkadian states of Babylonia and Assyria; formed following centuries of Akkadian cultural synergy with others, it reached the height of its power between the 24th and 22nd centuries BC following the conquests of king Sargon of Akkad, and is sometimes regarded as the first manifestation of an empire in history.

9) The Achaemenid Empire (ca. 550–330 BC), also known as the Persian Empire , was the successor state of the Median Empire, ruling over significant portions of what would become Greater Iran.

8) The Roman Empire.

7) Umayyad Caliphate (661–750) A caliphate is the Islamic form of government representing the political unity and leadership of the Muslim world. The Caliph’s position is based on the notion of a successor to Muhammad’s political authority. According to Sunnis, a Caliph can be any pious Muslim who is elected by the Muslims or their representatives; and according to Shia Islam, an Imam descended in a line from the Ahl al-Bayt.

6) Qing Dynasty (1890–1912), The Qing Dynasty was the last ruling dynasty of China, ruling from 1644 to 1912 (with a brief, abortive restoration in 1917). It was preceded by the Ming Dynasty and followed by the Republic of China. The dynasty was founded by the Manchu clan Aisin Gioro in what is today northeast China, (also known as Manchuria). Starting in 1644 it expanded into China proper and its surrounding territories, establishing the Empire of the Great Qing. Complete pacification of China was accomplished around 1683.The Qing Dynasty was overthrown following the Xinhai Revolution, when the Empress Dowager Longyu abdicated on behalf of the last emperor, Puyi, on February 12, 1912.

5) Russian Empire (1721–1917), The Russian Empire was a state that existed from 1721 until the Russian Revolution of 1917. It was the successor to the Tsardom of Russia, and the predecessor of the Soviet Union. At one point in 1866, it stretched from eastern Europe, across Asia, and into North America. At the beginning of the 19th century, Russia was the largest country in the world, extending from the Arctic Ocean to the north to the Black Sea on the south, from the Baltic Sea on the west to the Pacific Ocean on the east.
⦁ It was the second largest contiguous empire the world has ever seen, surpassed only by the Mongol Empire, and the third largest empire the world has ever seen, surpassed only by the British Empire and the Mongol Empire .
⦁ The household servants or dependents attached to the personal service were merely set free, while the landed peasants received their houses and orchards, and allotments of arable land.

4) Mongol Empire (1206–1368), The Mongol Empire was an empire from the 13th and 14th century spanning from Eastern Europe across Asia. It emerged from the unification of Mongol and Turkic tribes in modern day Mongolia, and grew through invasions, after Genghis Khan had been proclaimed ruler of all Mongols in 1206.

3) Mughal Empire (1526–1858) The Mughal Empire was an Islamic imperial power that ruled a large portion of Indian subcontinent which began in 1526, invaded and ruled most of South Asia by the late 17th and early 18th centuries, and ended in the mid-19th century.The Mughal Emperors were descendants of the Timurids of Turkistan, and at the height of their power around 1700, they controlled most of the Indian Subcontinent—extending from Bengal in the east to Balochistan in the west, Kashmir in the north to the Kaveri basin in the south. Its population at that time has been estimated as between 110 and 130 million, over a territory of over 4 million sq. km (1.5 million sq. mi.).The “classic period” of the Empire started in 1556 with the accession of Jalaluddin Mohammad Akbar, better known as Akbar the Great. It ended with the death of Emperor Aurangzeb in 1707, although the Empire continued for another 150 years.

2) British Empire, The British Empire comprised the dominions, colonies, protectorates, mandates, and other territories ruled or administered by the United Kingdom, that had originated with the overseas colonies and trading posts established by England in the late 16th and early 17th centuries. At its height it was the largest empire in history and, for over a century, was the foremost global power. By 1922, the British Empire held sway over a population of about 458 million people, one-quarter of the world’s population at the time, and covered more than 13,000,000 square miles (33,670,000 km2): approximately a quarter of the Earth’s total land area. As a result, its political, linguistic and cultural legacy is widespread. At the peak of its power, it was often said that “the sun never sets on the British Empire” because its span across the globe ensured that the sun was always shining on at least one of its numerous territories.

1) Ottoman Empire (1299–1923), The Ottoman Empire also known by its contemporaries as the Turkish Empire. was an Islamic empire that lasted from 1299 to November 1, July 24, 1923 It was succeeded by the Republic of Turkey, which was officially proclaimed on October 29, 1923. At the height of its power (16th–17th centuries), the empire spanned three continents, controlling much of Western Asia, Eastern and Southeastern Europe, the Caucasus, and North Africa. The Ottoman Empire contained 29 provinces and numerous vassal states, some of which were later absorbed into the empire, while others gained various types of autonomy during the course of centuries.

Any questions?

:shrugs and scratches head&arse:

Don't even get me started on Imperial Japan!

Throughout the series, word of mouth had carried throughout sectors of the forthrightness of Manticore. Her exalted ideals... morals, scruples and values had preceded her. Every down-trodden polity had heard of her -- of Manticore. I never heard any of the same regarding the Andies. In fact, I got the impression that the Andies were as expansionist as Haven. And, as another poster has focused my thoughts, just as ruthless.


Yes, let's go on about your prejudices. I notice in your posts you forgot to mention the AMERICAN Empire. America's not an empire, you say? Let's see.

First of all there is its ruthless expansion westward at the expense of the indigenous people's already living in those lands. In this it followed the example of the Russian Empire's expansion both southwards & westwards. There is also the example of the wars that it fought, such as the Mexican American War & the southern territories it gained at the expense of Mexico, its southern neighbour.

But perhaps an empire is only truly an empire if it has overseas colonies you may say? Well, let's see about that example.

You have the acquisition of Hawaii, an independent kingdom in the Pacific in 1898 following the overthrow of the native government in 1893 by American plantation owners with the assistance of US Naval officers & Marines. In 1998, President Clinton publically acknowledged that this was a crime... but they have not given the lands back to their original peoples, now have they? Then there is the Spanish American War of 1898, a war fought on a trumped up cassus belli. In that America gained possession of Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Guam & control of Cuba. When the native philippinos revolted against the American occupation they were suppressed in a very bloody manner in what was, for many years not even described as a war, being referred to instead as the Philippine Insurgency.

Another example would be the FRENCH Empire. The French colonial empire attained its greatest height during the Third Republic, it was their attempt to hang onto a Indochina that eventually lead to the downfall of the Fourth Republic & it was the loss of another major part of it, Algeria that led to a putsch & a bloody terrorist campaign during the Fifth Republic.

Do you want me to go on? I was making the point that there are many polities that are, or act as, empires in fact if not in name. That they are capable of at least EQUAL crimes as many so called empires whom you automatically equate with oppressors... & that the action of the Solarian League & the People's Republic of Haven were every bit as oppressive if not more so than the Andermani empire. I cited the example of the United States which has practised forcible relocation, ethnic cleansing even whilst proclaiming its own nobility of purposes EXACTLY as the Solarian League does in the Honorverse novels. At least Empires are being honest about it rather than cloaking their actions in a hypocritical veil of 'Good intentions.'

And this post is coming from someone descended from native Briton stock. We have had to endure invasions by the Normans, the Vikings, the Irish, the Anglo Saxons AND the Romans... yet you don't hear us banging on about it, do you?
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by cthia   » Fri Sep 11, 2015 11:32 am

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

SWM wrote:I think the underlying difference in opinion, cthia, is that you tend to have a very black-and-white view of things. It shows in many of our previous discussions. And there is not always a problem with having a black-and-white perspective. It is sometimes good to have that kind of clarity. Sometimes portraying things as shades of gray is merely an excuse for not setting boundaries.

Many of the rest of us, on the other hand, tend to think in shades of gray. I think this difference drives many of our discussions. It makes things interesting. :)

David Weber almost never writes stories with black-and-white divisions. The characters, organizations, and nations may tend strongly to one side or another, but there are always elements that soften the edges, and often deep ambiguities.

As for empires, David has a certain fondness for monarchies. Most of the monarchies in his books are portrayed in a very positive light, while the supposed democracies often come off poorly in contrast. Some of us remember David's past discussions about monarchies. That is probably affecting our perspective on the Anderman Empire.

Your analysis of me mirrors that of most of my friends. "The world is black and white to you even when it isn't." The women of my life tend to think that aspect about me is refreshing. The men are a bit put off. Mostly. From men I usually get "why do you have your head stuck up your ass!" I was asked that once at a party with my friends and I answered "because the world isn't as dark up there. And that's a shitty proposition." Loads of laughter from that one. Haven't heard the remark or the question since. 'Til now, though you're gentlemanly about it. For that, methanks you. :D

I tend to agree that it does make for interesting conversation. I thank you for acknowledging that as well. I do enjoy everyone's flavor and take on things. I often benefit from all the many interesting perspectives and I am more often enough swayed -- which is the point of intelligent give and take.

I don't truly think the world is all black and white. Sometimes it's just a matter of my being color blind -- says my wife. That's why she's so good for me. She provides balance. Gray area abounds and oftentimes its a matter of perspective and importance -- no right or wrong answer except to the heart of the subjective player.

Perhaps you are right that you all may be swayed by David's previous discussion regarding Monarchies but it can no more be blamed than my own preconceived prejudices against them.

Discussion sheds a little light directly overhead on things which oftentimes makes the gray areas disappear -- which were just long cast shadows of truths anyways.

I appreciate and very much enjoy this post.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by cthia   » Fri Sep 11, 2015 3:16 pm

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

Rincewind wrote:
cthia wrote:I alluded to my own prejudices regarding Empires in a previous post. Can you name an Empire that didn't foster some sort of resentment and ill will? A type of government associated with the brewing of a Genghis Khan?

Let's see. There was:

10) The Akkadian Empire (2334 BC to 2083 BC) was an empire centered in the city of Akkad and its surrounding region (in Ancient Iraq). The Akkadian state was the predecessor of the ethnic Akkadian states of Babylonia and Assyria; formed following centuries of Akkadian cultural synergy with others, it reached the height of its power between the 24th and 22nd centuries BC following the conquests of king Sargon of Akkad, and is sometimes regarded as the first manifestation of an empire in history.

9) The Achaemenid Empire (ca. 550–330 BC), also known as the Persian Empire , was the successor state of the Median Empire, ruling over significant portions of what would become Greater Iran.

8) The Roman Empire.

7) Umayyad Caliphate (661–750) A caliphate is the Islamic form of government representing the political unity and leadership of the Muslim world. The Caliph’s position is based on the notion of a successor to Muhammad’s political authority. According to Sunnis, a Caliph can be any pious Muslim who is elected by the Muslims or their representatives; and according to Shia Islam, an Imam descended in a line from the Ahl al-Bayt.

6) Qing Dynasty (1890–1912), The Qing Dynasty was the last ruling dynasty of China, ruling from 1644 to 1912 (with a brief, abortive restoration in 1917). It was preceded by the Ming Dynasty and followed by the Republic of China. The dynasty was founded by the Manchu clan Aisin Gioro in what is today northeast China, (also known as Manchuria). Starting in 1644 it expanded into China proper and its surrounding territories, establishing the Empire of the Great Qing. Complete pacification of China was accomplished around 1683.The Qing Dynasty was overthrown following the Xinhai Revolution, when the Empress Dowager Longyu abdicated on behalf of the last emperor, Puyi, on February 12, 1912.

5) Russian Empire (1721–1917), The Russian Empire was a state that existed from 1721 until the Russian Revolution of 1917. It was the successor to the Tsardom of Russia, and the predecessor of the Soviet Union. At one point in 1866, it stretched from eastern Europe, across Asia, and into North America. At the beginning of the 19th century, Russia was the largest country in the world, extending from the Arctic Ocean to the north to the Black Sea on the south, from the Baltic Sea on the west to the Pacific Ocean on the east.
⦁ It was the second largest contiguous empire the world has ever seen, surpassed only by the Mongol Empire, and the third largest empire the world has ever seen, surpassed only by the British Empire and the Mongol Empire .
⦁ The household servants or dependents attached to the personal service were merely set free, while the landed peasants received their houses and orchards, and allotments of arable land.

4) Mongol Empire (1206–1368), The Mongol Empire was an empire from the 13th and 14th century spanning from Eastern Europe across Asia. It emerged from the unification of Mongol and Turkic tribes in modern day Mongolia, and grew through invasions, after Genghis Khan had been proclaimed ruler of all Mongols in 1206.

3) Mughal Empire (1526–1858) The Mughal Empire was an Islamic imperial power that ruled a large portion of Indian subcontinent which began in 1526, invaded and ruled most of South Asia by the late 17th and early 18th centuries, and ended in the mid-19th century.The Mughal Emperors were descendants of the Timurids of Turkistan, and at the height of their power around 1700, they controlled most of the Indian Subcontinent—extending from Bengal in the east to Balochistan in the west, Kashmir in the north to the Kaveri basin in the south. Its population at that time has been estimated as between 110 and 130 million, over a territory of over 4 million sq. km (1.5 million sq. mi.).The “classic period” of the Empire started in 1556 with the accession of Jalaluddin Mohammad Akbar, better known as Akbar the Great. It ended with the death of Emperor Aurangzeb in 1707, although the Empire continued for another 150 years.

2) British Empire, The British Empire comprised the dominions, colonies, protectorates, mandates, and other territories ruled or administered by the United Kingdom, that had originated with the overseas colonies and trading posts established by England in the late 16th and early 17th centuries. At its height it was the largest empire in history and, for over a century, was the foremost global power. By 1922, the British Empire held sway over a population of about 458 million people, one-quarter of the world’s population at the time, and covered more than 13,000,000 square miles (33,670,000 km2): approximately a quarter of the Earth’s total land area. As a result, its political, linguistic and cultural legacy is widespread. At the peak of its power, it was often said that “the sun never sets on the British Empire” because its span across the globe ensured that the sun was always shining on at least one of its numerous territories.

1) Ottoman Empire (1299–1923), The Ottoman Empire also known by its contemporaries as the Turkish Empire. was an Islamic empire that lasted from 1299 to November 1, July 24, 1923 It was succeeded by the Republic of Turkey, which was officially proclaimed on October 29, 1923. At the height of its power (16th–17th centuries), the empire spanned three continents, controlling much of Western Asia, Eastern and Southeastern Europe, the Caucasus, and North Africa. The Ottoman Empire contained 29 provinces and numerous vassal states, some of which were later absorbed into the empire, while others gained various types of autonomy during the course of centuries.

Any questions?

:shrugs and scratches head&arse:

Don't even get me started on Imperial Japan!

Throughout the series, word of mouth had carried throughout sectors of the forthrightness of Manticore. Her exalted ideals... morals, scruples and values had preceded her. Every down-trodden polity had heard of her -- of Manticore. I never heard any of the same regarding the Andies. In fact, I got the impression that the Andies were as expansionist as Haven. And, as another poster has focused my thoughts, just as ruthless.


Yes, let's go on about your prejudices. I notice in your posts you forgot to mention the AMERICAN Empire. America's not an empire, you say? Let's see.

First of all there is its ruthless expansion westward at the expense of the indigenous people's already living in those lands. In this it followed the example of the Russian Empire's expansion both southwards & westwards. There is also the example of the wars that it fought, such as the Mexican American War & the southern territories it gained at the expense of Mexico, its southern neighbour.

But perhaps an empire is only truly an empire if it has overseas colonies you may say? Well, let's see about that example.

You have the acquisition of Hawaii, an independent kingdom in the Pacific in 1898 following the overthrow of the native government in 1893 by American plantation owners with the assistance of US Naval officers & Marines. In 1998, President Clinton publically acknowledged that this was a crime... but they have not given the lands back to their original peoples, now have they? Then there is the Spanish American War of 1898, a war fought on a trumped up cassus belli. In that America gained possession of Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Guam & control of Cuba. When the native philippinos revolted against the American occupation they were suppressed in a very bloody manner in what was, for many years not even described as a war, being referred to instead as the Philippine Insurgency.

Another example would be the FRENCH Empire. The French colonial empire attained its greatest height during the Third Republic, it was their attempt to hang onto a Indochina that eventually lead to the downfall of the Fourth Republic & it was the loss of another major part of it, Algeria that led to a putsch & a bloody terrorist campaign during the Fifth Republic.

Do you want me to go on? I was making the point that there are many polities that are, or act as, empires in fact if not in name. That they are capable of at least EQUAL crimes as many so called empires whom you automatically equate with oppressors... & that the action of the Solarian League & the People's Republic of Haven were every bit as oppressive if not more so than the Andermani empire. I cited the example of the United States which has practised forcible relocation, ethnic cleansing even whilst proclaiming its own nobility of purposes EXACTLY as the Solarian League does in the Honorverse novels. At least Empires are being honest about it rather than cloaking their actions in a hypocritical veil of 'Good intentions.'

And this post is coming from someone descended from native Briton stock. We have had to endure invasions by the Normans, the Vikings, the Irish, the Anglo Saxons AND the Romans... yet you don't hear us banging on about it, do you?

You missed the point. America is not named an Empire. The name "Empire" gives me cause to pause because it speaks to my prejudices. And then the Andermani went and confirmed those prejudices, IMO.

At any rate, I'm going to have to employ Ali's tactic and rope-a-dope your punches being that my response would be wayyyyy too political spurned on by American pride. I escaped my father's noose but members of this forum have an ever ready rope awaiting political discussions outside of the political forum -- and my stitches haven't quite healed from my last political surgery.

And this post is coming from someone descended from native Briton stock. We have had to endure invasions by the Normans, the Vikings, the Irish, the Anglo Saxons AND the Romans... yet you don't hear us banging on about it, do you?

Yet I so hear you banging now. Which is fine -- situations give us all cause to pause. As this discussion gave me cause, to pause to my own... prejudices -- with concession.

P.S.

I'm married to a Briton, just recently. And she bangs all the time. lol

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top

Return to Honorverse