ChronicRder wrote:Honor Harrington
Thomas Carapelli
Thomas Theismas
Hamish Alexander
Esther McQueen
Lester Tourville
Aivars Terekhov
Mark Sarnow
Javier Giscard
Amos Parnell
Honorable Mentions to: Michelle Henke, Wesley Matthews, Alfredo Yu, and Alistair McKeon.
My only thing about all this series, and by extension their strategists, is his emphasis on R&D. Its a common thing in Weber's series. He likes to take a lot of experimental designs and techs and throw them from the drawing board into massive operations. Worse, he glosses over their acceptance trials and development difficulties to the point where his first real test is a massive operation. And of course, they have a 90-95% solution. My point is: it briefs great, but, as a serving soldier, I'm hesitant to put my life and the lives of my subordinates in the hands of some new experimental tech as the linchpin of my entire plan. That's just daring Murphy to screw you anally--without lube.
I completely agree about the . . . undesirability of issuing invitations to Murphy.

I think, however, that you are overlooking a few things. Like the fact that the "new weapons" deployed by Hamish Alexander and 8th Fleet were the product of a fifty-year R&D program and that they were all tested out using actual hardware in places like Silesia (HAE) and Manticore B (EoH). In other words, very little of the hardware the Manties are deploying against the Peeps is untested and unknown. In many cases, the degree to which it turned out to surpass their opponents' hardware was actually greater than they had assumed in any of their sims or field tests because they deliberately used pessimistic assumptions (even when their field tests suggested the opposite) until they'd actually seen them in action and evaluated them against "live" opposition. There's also the fact that Caparelli held them back until he was prepared to use them decisively rather than rushing them into service in a white heat. With Apollo he found himself in a rather different situation, because Manticore's back was against the wall and he had to get every weapon he had into service as quickly as he could. Even then, however, the system had been thoroughly tested before the first live rounds were issued to Honor's ships. Moreover, Apollo and Keyhole are both the result of very lengthy, ongoing R&D programs, and each stage of the hardware was thoroughly tested in simulations and training exercises before it was committed to action. I don't spend a lot of time writing about acceptance trails and field testing because I get enough complaints about info dumps away from the action as it is, but I have given actual examples of the process in the test and I promise it's going on in the background even when you don't see it.
Honest!
