tlb wrote:I view Honor somewhat differently than you, because the Harrington line was "lost" more than four hundred years previously. So if Honor is still equivalent to the best that the Onion has, then there has been NO real progress in developing intellect in those years. There is NO sign that the current Alphas are savants and the only case mentioned of where they tried to develop one has failed miserably: Francesca Simões.
penny wrote:First off, we do not know that Honor is the equivalent to the best the Alignment has to offer.
What makes you think they need Alphas who are more intelligent than Honor? She already has no equal in the GA.
We’ve had this discussion before as well. It is illogical to keep harping on there being a lack of progress in the Alpha line as far as intelligence since Honor. There is only so much tinkering one can do to a limited brain and Honor is probably the limit before unwanted side effects take over.
It is also unfair/untrue that there have been no improvements since Honor. How do you know that? The Malign already stated that the improvements they are working on has to do with “accessories” and not intelligence.
Accessories, like, and I’m just guessing to use as an example, hardening against radiation exposure. Natural resistance to the elements, etc .
I am quite willing to agree that the Malign has been working on “accessories” and not intelligence. So there have been improvements on things other than intellect (for example, they have longer lives, even before using prolong).
But that calls into question all your statements about superior thinkers needing superior computers. There is no evidence that they have thinkers better than what can be found in the Honorverse at large (even excluding Honor). The prime evidence for this lack is the failed performance of their six century plan so far. The remaining Detweilers admit there have to be a lot of adjustments.
PS: Where is your evidence that Honor is smarter than anyone else in the Grand Alliance? The way that she is above the rest is in her empathetic abilities, not necessarily her intelligence.